‘Hate Crimes” and how they’re recorded

”Hate crimes recorded in England and Wales hit record high”

And

”Record rise in hate crimes may not be ‘genuine’, says Home Office”

”This has prompted claims that police are under pressure to log more crimes as having a racial, religious, sexual or transgender element and are “pandering” to special interest groups.”

Does any fucker know what a hate crime is?
Taking the piss out of a ridiculous tranny or mincing shirtlifter? Is that hate or good old British humour. Is calling somefucker a Packi a hate crime? A Jock? A Paddy? A Taffy?

What we have is ‘special interest groups’ who seek to divide by pushing a woke and generally incompetent police force into looking for a particular angle for any interaction. This saves them having to investigate real crime, which suits them fine.

We are going down the shitter because of these ‘special interest groups’ and their allies in the cops.

MSN News Link 1

And the counter report:

MSN News Link 2

Nominated by: Cuntstable Cuntbubble

Amazon [11] and Their Drivers


Amazon and their drivers are cunts, why you may ask, I was unlucky enough to have one of their drug and alcahol test centres move onto the same compound as my garage and I can say with compete honesty, I have never seen so many scrotes, crimes, immigrant and general fuckmuppery in one place over the space of a year or two in my life, it really was like a massive cunt magnet.
Amazon exploit the fucking rems beyond belief, but a part of me see, s a story like above and I think fuck em all, the driver runs someone’s puppy over, fucks off without saying a word about killing the families beloved pet.

Daily Fail Link 1.

Lukily the woman has cctv and caught the cunt, Amazon the cunts offered her a £250 voucher and wouldn’t release the drivers name.
What a bunch of cunts Amazon are and what a cunt the driver was, probably some immigrant cunt who shouldn’t even be in the country, boils my piss to nuclear fusion levels….

Daily Fail Link 2. (Found this and thought it was funny – NA)

Nominated by: Fuglyucker

“Negative Effects of Online Content”

Molly Russell, a 14 year old schoolgirl from London, killed herself through self harm due to depression and what the coroner concluded to be “negative effects of online content”.

It was found she had been viewing thousands of disturbing images on various social media sites, including Instagram, Facebook and Pinterest. These distressing images, including photos and descriptions of suicides, only compounded her mental health to the point of committing suicide in 2017.

At the time both social media sites had little or no moderation with regards adult content, which may have explained how Molly was able to access such imagery.

Meta, the owners of Facebook and Instagram, admitted that a lot of images uploaded back then violated its own content policies and they have apologised to the Russell family.

Moderation on these sites has improved over the years, but no site is absolutely fool-proof and a lot of responsibility needs to be with the parents to make web browsing safe for their children.

Molly’s death is of course sad and very unfortunate given her known mental health problems, but the new buzz term “Negative Effects of Online Content” is going to an overused idiom for any future scenarios where people suffer similar bouts of depression through viewing disturbing content on the internet as a whole and not just social media sites.

There are measures in place with most web browsers where parents can moderate what their children are able to see. But it means having to access all of their children’s devices and put those options in place. However, kids will always find workarounds by going on Google or YouTube to find out how.

What is even more concerning is that this might promote even more censorship from the controllers of web browsers such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Microsoft Edge/Bing. We have already seen them take action against racist and homophobic comments and imagery; the next step will be micro-aggressions, and other “offensive” content that could be construed as “negative”

Both online websites and parents themselves need to be more responsible in order to protect what children can access. But this shouldn’t mean introducing a form of censorship that will affect the majority of people through no fault of their own.

However, as we have seen in other current affairs news, the minority always seem to be able to get what they want at the expense of the majority.

Guardian News Link

Headspace News Link

Nominated by: Technocunt

Dahmer Netflix Series


I don’t have Netflix, but I have seen their recent drama series about the infamous ‘Milwaukee Cannibal’.

First of all, it’s pretty good and the actor playing him does a great job. Why cunt it then?

It’s because about half way through (around episode 6) it becomes yet another wokefest, in which all whities are bad or thick as fuck and all non whites are lovely and clever. It’s around the point Jesse Jackson sticks his oar in. I’m just not buying this is how every cunt involved was.

Now many (not all by any stretch) of Dahmer’s victims were indeed non white. There is a definite insinuation he did this deliberately. I don’t think this is true. He just killed whatever was available. He lived in an area with a small white population.

Dahmer wanted (and should’ve got) the chair and was very open and honest about his crimes when caught. I think his confessions were true. And so do pretty much all cunts involved in the case, including shrinks and writers who spoke to the mad cunt.

He said he just targeted men he liked the look of in gay bars that would talk to him, whatever the colour.

Even the fella that killed Dahmer in prison was portrayed as a nice bloke, sent ‘mental’ when a stupid white librarian lets him look at stuff about Dahmer in the newspapers.

The cops were all homophobic racists. The woman reporting the bad smell was a genius. Her white boss at work was a thick cunt (‘Did you get to see the zombies? What were they like?’) Jesse Jackson was not a race baiter. He comes across as a cross between Jesus Christ and Einstein.

It seems the cops did monumentally fuck up, when they returned a 14 year old Laotian boy to Dahmer after he’d been drugged. Despite this, it was all about the police being racist to ‘black and brown’ people (you keep hearing this). I’m not sure people from Lao call themselves brown?

There has also been whining from the gays. It portrays them in a bad light they say.

Yes, there are quite a few gay serial killers and rapists who drug victims, sorry. People should be warned. The current climate forbids that, so a drama like this acts as a public information film in many ways. I wager had all of Gacy’s and Dahmer’s victims received such warnings, some of them might still be around. Or anyone at certain celebrity’s pool parties. Stephen Port, anyone? Fucking loads of the cunts.

Good series, spoiled by race baiting and moaning puffs.

Get to fuck.

https://time.com/6218411/jeffrey-dahmer-netflix-controvesy/

Nominated by: Cuntybollocks

The Party Conferences

Honestly, does anyone, other than the MSM take this shit seriously? A load of cunts talking bollocks and , occasionally, making complete knobs of themselves. (ie Mavis May dancing on to the stage, having a coughing fit and the bullshit sign falling down behind her) You really couldn’t make this annual display of cuntery up.

The other day I listened to the speech from our new Home Secretary. A load of tough talk about cracking down on the sc*m bags and stopping the invasion of the dinghy raiders, met with rapturous applause at the end of every sentence.

Yeah, just fuck off, heard it all before. Heard it from the cunts who are now coining it from their “directorships” at corporations they helped out in the past, speaking tours and sucking the BBC cock.

Fuck every cunt in the Palace of Westminster!

Lying bullshitting cunts every one of them. (Not a fan then, Freddie? – Day Admin)

Nominated by: Freddie the Frog