New York City (Painting)


“New York City.”

The famous painting that has apparently been hanging upside down in the Kuntz Museum, in the Hague, for the past seventy seven years, & no one noticed. It was an example of ‘abstract art.’ Painted by Piet Mondrian, so maybe a difficult one for many to determine. “It should have been put up the correct way in the first place,” an expert said. Due to it’s age & size though, if it was rotated througth 180 degrees, after all these years, chances are it would just fall apart. From a distance, it does somehow remind me of a Betterware catalogue picture of one of my granny’s tea cloths. Kuntz just says it all!

It had apparently been inadvertantly inverted. “New York City I” (Painted in 1942)

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-63423811
(Link kindly provided by Liberal Liquidator)

Nominated by: Lord Scunthorpe

Rochdale Groomers and the Legal System


This pair are finally going to be deported, apparently, but I don’t think I’ll be holding my breath waiting.

Grauniad Link.

As if their crimes weren’t despicable enough, they have now spent 7 years and £500,000+ of taxpayers money fighting deportation, aided and abetted by our legal system.

Khan said he needed to stay in the UK to provide a role model for his son and he couldn’t have groomed anyone because he didn’t speak English. Both excellent reasons why his extended family should join him on the flight back.

I don’t know which disgusts me most, the groomers or the lawyers, so a cunting for them both seems in order.

Nominated by: Jeezum Priest

Rishi Sunak [7] and the Woke Backlash


Our first British-Asian PM and What will the Woke Say Now?

Rishi is our new PM, born in Southampton and is therefore British despite his Asian background. I didn’t particularly rate him when he was Chancellor, especially throwing billions of magic pounds at all and sundry during the pandemic. And there was also the matter of trust, especially after resigning from his position after disagreeing with the-then PM, Boris Johnson over a number of issues.

However, I am prepared to give this bloke a chance of pulling the Conservative party together at long last even though I don’t believe it will ever be the same party of old.

What does and will interest me is how the progressive liberals will react to his policy decisions. Twitter, the BBC, the Guardian and a shedload of other “woke” standard-bearers will no doubt be far more cautious about criticising the man and his handling of the many issues that face the country.

It is well known that the woke fully endorse the concept of hate crime – in other words slagging off the usual suspects, including any hints of micro-aggressive actions. But if Sunak makes some bad decisions will the likes of the Guardian criticise him in the same robust way as they did with Johnson/Truss? Or will they just blame those around him rather than the man himself?

Labour will also find themselves in a similar situation especially during PMQT. Will the likes of Butler and Abbott take potshots at him? Will they say he is just a “superficial person of colour”? Or will they side-step the issue and blame previous administrations or other government departments managed by “whitey” ministers?

Whatever the response it is clear that the Woke will have to be far more cautious because for years they’ve been banging on about diversity and inclusion of BAMEs. Well here we are, it has finally happened, but will this please or annoy these trigger-happy cunts!

Grauniad Link.

Nominated by: Technocunt

Hygiene Bank


A “kindly adjust your dress before leaving – and wash your hands” – cunting for yet another soppy charity in search of a problem, who claim that many people are skipping work because they cannot afford to keep themselves clean and terriby embarrassed about it – indeed, they feel “shame”:-

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-63403823

I would not-so-respectfully suggest that those people who claim to avoid work because of their personal hygiene, are actually work-shy lazy bastards.

The poor devils can’t afford soap and deoderant (though I suspect most of them can afford a scratchcard and the Sun newspaper). You can buy packs of three bars of soap in Poundland for £1 (other poundshops are available) and you can buy both men and womens deoderants for 59 pence in Lidl (I buy it for the spouse to cover up her more malodorous farts, which echo round the room in the evening after a day on the chocolate peanuts). Beside if you wash properly you don’t need a deoderant. In my RN days it was a shower every morning with Lifebuoy and again in the evening if you had a strenuous day – which was most days, there were no deoderants at the time, except the fruity gentemen who would discreetly apply a little perfume.

If you are THAT poor, you could even dive into a public lavatory and use the free soap in the dispensers, but I just feel this charity, no doubt fully suppored by Dame Kweer to show what bastards the government are, have been led up the garden path by lazy indivduals who prefer to sit and watch Holly and Phil all morning (and I bet Phil smells as lovely as Katie Boyle used to with her Camay).

If you do stink like a polecat, you could always get a job working from home, where, like the spouse, you can fart the day away to your hearts content and generally look like a compost heap.

How on earth do these charities exist and still manage to keep a straight face?

Nominated by: W.C. Boggs