Oh dear, how sad. It looks as though journalist and ‘commentator’ little Benjamin Butterworth has wet his bed again.
So who’s upset the wee leftie lamb this time? Why it’s poor old JK Rowling, who’s had the unbelievable temerity to include a character in her new ‘Strike’ novel who assumes the persona of a woman in order to commit murder.
Appearing on ‘Good Morning Britain’, the whey-faced wanker bleated ‘a lot of people, myself included, are incredibly worried about how this smears transexual people’. When host Susanna Reid pointed out to Blabbermouth (who, naturally, hadn’t read the book) that the character in question isn’t actually transexual, he mithered on about how there could be ‘confusion in people’s minds’, and how this will still be seen ‘as a way to debase (transexuals)’.
Christ on a bike, you little prick. Anyone would think that such a plot device has never been used in fiction before. Have you never seen ‘Psycho’? Or perhaps you think that the mere idea is bigoted, on the grounds that a transexual couldn’t possibly also be a criminal?
Anyway, the notion that this could somehow be used a means to ‘debase’ transexuals is really stretching things to the extreme; it’s yet more ‘woke’ whining by a paid-up member of the perpetually offended brigade. The reality is likely to be that the vast majority of people, if they even bother to consider the matter, simply won’t give a flying fuck.
You’re as limp as a week old lettuce. Stop simpering and let people enjoy a good read without getting on their case. And get a fucking life while you’re about it, you twat.
Nominated by: Ron Knee
