To Bigot or Not To Bigot


The definition of a bigot is lost on this one:

A recent story:

Kent Online Story.

A village has reacted with anger over a poster in a church noticeboard stating: “We don’t celebrate Pride, we preach Christ crucified.”

OK you would think- that is the churches opinion and everybody should surely be allowed an opinion- after all there’s always two sides isn’t there?

No so apparently- one of the locals in particular got their already brain-washed 4 year old son to make his own ‘pride associated’ poster that now conforms to how those with the opposite opinion think the church should think. In a statement of totally irony, the mother of the 4 year old stated:

‘I was shocked and disgusted to have a bigoted message being publicly shown,” she said. “I decided to have a chat with my kids about it and my eldest Alfred said he wanted to colour a rainbow with ‘Be Kind’ on it’

Hmmmm….so the church has an opposite view to this mother, and this mother is so intolerant of that opposing view, she decides to censor it as she doesn’t agree with it. In my book, that’s being a very big bigot Mrs, so go and fuck yourself you stupid cunt….and take that brain washed soppy cunt of a son with you

Nominated by: Chuff Chugger

Nasa (3) – Wokeing on the Moon

A Final Frontier cunting for those galactic wankers at NASA.

I’ve been following the Artemis mission on their website for a while & noticed the other day that one of the stated aims is the first woman on the moon and you’ve guessed it, the first person of colour on the moon (presumably closely followed by the first stabbing on the moon.)

Now I’m not against either aim, per se, but surely the astronaut selection criteria must be the best person for the job, not whether or not you’ve got a minge or eat mainly at KFC. If it happens to be a female and/or a POC, great go for it.

Actually it strikes me they could kill two birds with one stone here and send that fat bitch shitting in the phone box (in the Notting Hill Carnival nom); she looked like she already had enough sustenance on board to not need food and they could save weight by not fitting a shithouse, then drop her off on the darkside of the moon and forget about her. Though I bet the cunts wouldn’t headline it ‘The First Spoon On The Moon’.

Apparently the aim in all this is to show that space exploration is open to everyone. So does that mean the new lunar buggy has to be a spaz-chariot? Will the first Peaceful mission to the moon be launched on a winged horse and tie in with the first underage girl mission to the moon?

As a kid, I watched Armstrong walk on the moon, the main aim was to just do it and it was a fucking awesome success. Those astronauts all the way through the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo programs were fucking heroes in my eyes and now NASA has to shit all over their legacy with this diverse, woke bag of bollocks. Cunts!

BBC News Link

Nominated by: The Stained Gusset


And how about this from The Wizard’s Sleeve

A very straightforward one, this. The USA’s newest attempt to send a rocket to the moon.

Whether you are on the side of the so-called conspiracy theorists and believe that the original 1969 moon landing was falsified, due to many factors including the Van Allen Belt, flag movement, no stars etc. (check out this link: https://matrixdisclosure.com/van-allen-belt-moon/) or whether you believe that man reached the moon whilst sitting in a tin-can (this is ground control to Major Tom!) with computers a myriad of times more basic than our mobile phones; regardless of which “side” you are on – the question I would like answered is: Why even bother in the first place?

If you do believe that human beings reached the moon all those years ago, all it showed us is that there is bugger-all there of any interest – It is just a cold lump of rock covered in dust. It’s not made of cheese and there isn’t a man that lives there either. So why return? What’s the point? It costs shitloads of money to do these missions, so why not forget the whole waste of time and use the money to try and sort out some of the many problems we already face down here on planet Earth: surely that would be money better spent?

They can’t even launch a sodding rocket unless the weather is exactly right or the temperature of the equipment is exact (check out:BBC News Link for more info) so watching all that cool sci-fi star-trek stuff with high ideas such as warp speed, teleportation and shagging aliens who want to understand our human emotion of “love”, makes our efforts to go into space look like a laughing stock anyway, as I really get the feeling we will never reach the point where real life matches sci-fi anyway – and certainly not in our lifetimes.

The human race will end up making itself extinct due to stupid wars or scientific cock-ups way before we achieve anything useful in space. It will be too late when the cockroaches have taken over, or Earth resembles something out of Planet of the Apes (those damn filthy apes!).

LGBTQ March Becomes a GBTQ March


A cunting for the dubious LGBTQ movement and ‘Pride’ events.

This time, the ‘L’ being told by daft rozzers at Cardiff pride they can’t take part because they might make the trans-folk feel unsafe.

Express Link.

What a load of divisive, exclusive and petty cack LGBTQ and ‘pride’ have become.

Weird, stupid and – in the words of my generation – gaaayyy.

Nominated by: Cuntamus Prime

(The woke will eventually eat itself – Day Admin)

Donald Trump [9]


Among the many accusations made against former president Donald Trump since he left office are that he fraudulently inflated the value of business assets to obtain favourable loans, he deflated the value of other assets to reduce taxes, he attempted to coerce officials to alter election results in his favour and incited the attack on the Capitol Building to prevent the transfer of power following his election defeat.

As if all that wasn’t enough, he is now accused of stealing sensitive documents from the national archives and hiding them at his home in Florida.

The former president has a perfectly credible explanation for this. First of all, he didn’t take any documents. And if he did, he gave them back, and if he didn’t give them back it was because they belonged to him, and if they didn’t belong to him it was alright because they were declassified, and if they weren’t declassified they were planted by the FBI.

As a former president who had the election stolen from him he should be given the benefit of the doubt. Anyone who won’t accept his explanation has to be an unamerican child-molesting devil-worshipping democrat.

True patriots who wish to help fund his legal team to fight the various false allegations made against him, and make America great again, can donate by cash, card or cheque. Thank you.

What actually happened was, multiple requests were made for the return of the missing documents. Some were handed over but despite further requests, Trump’s lawyers insisted that was all he had. After months of prevarication a judge signed a search warrant and the FBI retrieved the remaining documents from Trump’s home.

The fact that he took the documents, and shouldn’t have, is inescapable. The question is, why did he take them in the first place? Not even Donald Trump could seriously imagine that they had somehow become his own personal property. Apart from their monetary value, the obvious reason is leverage – ‘you see your way to dropping any criminal charges against me and I’ll see these things don’t fall into the wrong hands’.

Is there anyone who still thinks Trump puts his country first? One way of making America great again would be to have the Orange Man measured for an orange suit.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/donald-trump-criminal-case.html

Nominated by: Allan

Airport Passenger Drop Off Fees

This may be old news to some, but I’ve literally just seen a ‘news’ story on the Sly News website. It’s one of those stories that you (well, me at least) immediately assume it’s made up because it’s so preposterous that it can’t possibly be true.

It is. I can barely fucking believe it. UK airports charging to drop passengers off. I’m not making this up:

Sky News Link

Something which has been perfectly normal for decades, dropping friends and family off at the airport, now incurs a charge for doing so. This is insane! What’s next? Charging you for entering the terminal building? Season ticket for using the moving walkway? Checking in fee? Maybe we should apply this insanity further afield. Perhaps the local council charging passengers for waiting at a bus stop?

The air transportation business is out of control. Remember the massive hike in oil prices a few years ago and all the airlines were whining about fuel costs. Ticket prices were jacked up and stayed there. Then they started charging for carrying your luggage. I mean, how dare you go on holiday with a suitcase? Some cunt Chancellor introduced an airport tax too. For the audacity of leaving the country, you’re effectively fined. How is any of this shit legal?

Nominated by: Imitation Yank