Back to 60

Now these ladies are pissed that they can not claim their pensions at 60 as promised, but they will have to wait until the same age as men to claim their pension. I can see that these people have been royally fucked over by the government but so has everyone else who have had their pensions pushed back from 65 to 66 and then 67 and for some it’s now 68 and 69. What fucking gripes me is that these cunts desperate for their share want their pensions pushed back to 60.

Meanwhile the men they have grown up with (and maybe shared marriages et al with) could not claim theirs till 65 anyway. Fuck equality when it works against you, suddenly that can go out the window. So this is what makes my piss boil. These cunts (sorry women) should be fighting for everyone’s pension male or female but no they are just fighting for their own. Selfish cunts.

Sorry ladies you wanted equality, you may have even burnt your bra to obtain it, but now you have it you realise that it’s shit. You can’t pick and choose when you want equality but you arrogant fuckers think you can.

Nominated by Cuntsince1066

The Pope [3]

An angry cunting, if I may, for Pope Francis.

This disgusting apologist for paedophiles is now blaming ‘the Devil’ for thousands of his priests preying on children, calling on people to believe that the ‘malign one’, as he puts it, is responsible for decades of the most horrific abuse, actions that ruin not only the child’s young life, but carries over into their adult life too, causing serious mental health issues, self-harm, self-loathing and suicide.

Let’s not beat about the bush; in the year (of our Lord!) 2018, he’s actually using a childish, cartoon-like representation of Lucifer as scapegoat for thousands of child rapists, warning believers not to dismiss Satan as merely a ‘myth, a representation, a symbol, a figure of speech or an idea’.

And, of course, as only self-important tossers and pathetic halfwits continue to believe in any sort of organised religion, Catholics in general will seek to indulge the continuation of the abuse by dissociative rationalisation, believing their false narrative that once a priest has confessed his guilt to god, he is therefore absolved and will ascend into heaven, leaving a trail of broken lives behind him, his legacy protected by the corrupt cunts at the top.

Bollocks to Catholics and all religions.

Nominated by Thomas the Cunt Engine

Daisy Goodwin

Sociopathic females, with the Machiavellian mentality. Akin to leeches, not letting go as they seek to draw even more blood. Quid Pro Quo does not figure in their world.

Daisy Goodwin, author & poet, in reference to the main roles in the BBC dramas, The Body Guard & Eve, both played by females. Job done you might think, women rights applauding. A tick in the box for an already overpopulated TV female employees. Not so according to Madam Goodwin.”By awarding females these two major roles, only undermines the fight for female equality.” “By pretending that sexism has gone away through gender blind eyes!!!” No!! you screwed up, retarded woman, of some intelligence, minus one iota of common sense, it does not!!! What it does show is these snowflake TV bosses, with their own ulterior motives, bending over backwards to please you. But true to form, you just move the goal posts again, like a bunny boiling, stir crazy fanatic, whose end justifies the means. Give a little, take a little, a simplistic equaliser, is not part of your curriculum. You demand the lot, and then more.

Another destructive force, too embittered to see the sorrowful downfall of your ways. Even when it’s all too late. Pleasing you, is like catching a greased eel wearing a Pair of Mitts.
Though a lot less fun.

Nominated by Lostsheep

Stupid names

Back in maaaah day (colliery band plays the theme from the old ‘Hovis’ ad), when men were men an’t lassies were pleased ’bout it, people had PROPER names, like Mary and Jane, Tom or Bill.
But as time went imperceptibly by, an air of affectation crept in. James was no longer ‘Jim’ but ‘Jamie’, Robert was no longer ‘Bob’ but ‘Robbie’. Then it seemed that every chav was naming their female progeny ‘Kylie-Anne’ or ‘Chardonnay’.
Fast forward to the present, and utter naffness is often the rule. I offer two recent examples from my own experience by way of illustration. I was eating out in Edinburgh, and at the next table were a couple of pushy ‘yahoo’ types ( a great show was made over the wine selection) and their precocious brood, who rejoiced in the names of ‘Cosmo’ and (wait for it) ‘Cascade’. On the second occasion, I was in a playpark with my granddaughter when a fat scratter bawled out to her snot-nosed brat ‘c’mere NOW, Cheyenne!’.
Naturally in such matters, you can always depend upon the world of celebrity when it comes to making a tit of yourself. Who would think to call their kid ‘Bay Atlas’? step forward Kirstie Allsopp. How about ‘Rocket Zot’ (Sam Worthington),
‘Kal-El’ (Nick Cage), ‘Pilot Inspektor’ (Jason Lee), and ‘Daisy Boo’, ‘Buddy Bear’ and ‘Petal Blossom Rainbow’ (Jamie Oliver)? Bless.
There’s a lot of this nuttiness about. In dear old Blighty, there are hapless sods condemned to go through life burdened with the names ‘Superman’, ‘Gandalf’, ‘Pochohontas’, ‘z13’ (??) and even ‘Chlomidiya’, would you believe.
Some countries have even taken to banning certain monikers. The US has banned ‘Fish’ and ‘Chips’ (for twins, natch) and ‘Sex Fruit’. New Zealand has forbidden ‘Lucifer’, ‘V8′, ’89’, and ‘Talulah Does The Hula From Hawaii’, while inexplicably allowing ‘Number 16 Bus Shelter’. Some cunts in Denmark even wanted to call their kid ‘Anus’. It takes all sorts.
Is this wankery catching? Go on you tossers, cunt your own sprog by giving it a ludicrous handle so everyone can take the piss, and show the whole world that you’re a cunt yourself while you’re at it.

Must say that ‘Muhammed’ is a pretty cool name though… Most popular boy’s name in Britain in 2017 I gather…

Nominated by Ron Knee

Wikipedia

Wikipedia are censorious cunts. They have made the decision, in partnership with Goolag (surprise fucking surprise) to ban Breitbart from being used as a source, except in ‘factual and uncontroversial articles specifically about Breitbart.’

So basically, ‘we will control the narrative and define what classes as correct thought by banning what sources are allowed to be used aside from when we’re talking about them as an example of what wrongthink is.’ Hell, I don’t even use or particularly like Breitbart but I find such blatant censorship incredibly unsettling. Fuck you, Wikipedia, fuck you – I’m now switching to Everipedia as an alternative.

Nominated by OpinionatedCunt