Ann Francke (No, not the little Dutch girl with a diary, it’s some other cunt)

‘Listen guys, d’you want to talk about the game? See you in the gent’s at coffee time…’

Would you believe it? Chat about football, cricket and other sports should be ‘actively curtailed’ in the workplace according to dingbat Ann Francke, Director of the Chartered Management Institute. According to Mizzz Francke, sports chat can exclude women, and can be (wait for it) ‘a gateway to more laddish behaviour’, and if unchecked, ‘is a signal of a more laddish culture’, such as boorish sexual banter.

Christ on a bike, where do they find the fuckwits who come up with this nonsense? In a stupid factory somewhere? For a start, these comments are actually sexist. Millions of women up and down the country follow, and indeed participate, in sport of all kinds. To suggest that they are poor little dears who might feel left out and unable to take part in a sport-related conversation is ludicrous. At the same time Francke suggests,rather oddly, that ‘talking about technical aspects of football, such as video assisted refereeing,could disproportionately exclude women’. She seems to be implying that in fact, women are too thick to appreciate such things, which doesn’t strike me as being a very consistent line of argument. Or indeed very sisterly.

What happens then, when the conversation turns to films, or kids, or the weather, or holidays? Is everyone who isn’t interested in these things presumed to be left feeling excluded? Taking Francke’s line of thinking to its logical conclusion, talk about anything other than work-related matters would have to be ‘curtailed’. And as for her assertion that sports chat can lead to a more uninhibited type of conversation, I can only respond by stating that in any of my places of work over the years, women have never been backward in coming forward as far as sexual banter is concerned. There’s a bit of a ‘ladette’ culture about as well, if my experience is anything to go by. No mention of that though by Francke.

I do find it odd then to think that all these strong, empowered women we keep hearing so much about are simultaneously in need of measures to protect against any bruising of their delicate sensibilities. I don’t know, maybe I’m just being a bit paranoid; maybe Francke’s comments are nothing more than another banal bit of SJW-type posturing, making what she thinks are the right noises. Yet these comments do seem to me to be indicative of the kind of thought police mentality we get so much of these days, putting men in the sights of the identity politics warriors again. Moreover they smack of hypocrisy. If some bloke suggested that women should be ‘curtailed’ from talking about make-up, handbags, clothes or whatever, this banshee would no doubt be wailing ‘misogyny!’ and ‘sexism!’, and ranting on about men wanting to control women. I conclude that this self-styled ‘expert on gender balance in the workplace’ only believes in free speech when people like her get to define what it actually is. Methinks that here’s another one who’d like to control the narrative to suit her own agenda.

I’m with Piers Morgan on this, who responded by saying ‘we’ve got to stop these virtue-signalling cretins sucking all the fun out of life’. No doubt many of you out there in IsACland will go further, and demand that this gobshite should get back in the kitchen and put her old man’s tea on.

Management potential, then? I’d say it’s more a case of sacked in the morning, you’re getting sacked in the morning…

Nominated by Ron Knee

Starting a sentence with ‘So’

Answering every question starting with ‘So’….

It’s taken a while, but fuck a rubber duck, this trend, if you can call it that, is really getting on my tits now.

There was a time when beginning a sentence with the word ‘so’ was appropriate, such as asking certain questions e.g. “So what’s all this about then?” and “So when are we going to go?”, but now everyone from little runt school kids to university professor’s are using ‘so’ as the default start to most replies. Sooo irritating, and if it’s irritating then it’s cuntish, just like this shitty spelling checker that changes cunt to count, the useless cunt (sorry going off piste a bit there, ISACers)

After a little research on the net, it seems that this misuse of the little conjunction was the favourite of geek programmers and techies, then it went viral when Mr Million dollars-an-hour and master life manipulator “Cuntbook” CEO Mark Fuckerberg was starting every reply with ‘So’ in interviews. The guy makes me sick. He has so much fucking clout, the expressionless faced cunt. Looks like a character from Star Trek; I just wish someone would beam him up.

Now I don’t pretend to be word perfect, but the feeling I get when everyone and his wife now uses this sentence initial when being questioned is that they are trying to avoid answering properly, because they either don’t know how to, or can’t be bothered, the lazy fucktards. ‘So’ is the new ‘basically’, as far as I’m concerned and if it doesn’t bother anybody else fine, or should I say cool.

Fuck me, I’m turning into a trendy slang cunt.

Nominated by Dai O’Rhea

No Platforming

“No platforming”….The deliberate, nasty and premeditated practice of not allowing a different opinion or viewpoint to be debated, or discussed by preventing the speaker FROM SPEAKING!

This abhorrent practice is becoming more and more widespread, accepted and promoted and it’s just plain wrong.

The loony, laughable left and their official wokesman, Owen “rusks and milk” Jones, are ceaseless champions of this abomination and are actually allowed to get away with it, claiming they do so in the name of “democracy”. A quick heads up kids – one of the fundamental underpinning principles of democracy is FREE SPEECH and if somebody has a different opinion to you, that does not make them automatically wrong and it is not acceptable to demonise them.

People are waking up to this, and some are now calling it out for what it is – Racism, Fascism, bigotry and Hate speech, because:

“No platforming” IS A CUNT!

Nominated by Vernon Fox

Chidera Eggerue

CAN’T THINK WHY SHE IS SO DEFENSIVE ABOUT SAGGY TITS. IT’S A COMPLETE MYSTERY…

A nomination please for Chidera Eggerue.

Like most, if not all posters to ISAC, I’d never heard of this non-entity until I saw, in the current television guide, a programme hosted by this imbecile called, ‘Bring back the bush: Where did our pubic hair go?’ This will be shown by Channel 4, naturally. This is where the above mentioned nominee ‘explores our relationship with pubic hair, challenging herself and her peers to grow it out and reveal their naked, natural bodies to the world at an exhibition’.

Further evidence of her cuntitude is shown by the fact that she started #SaggyBoobsMatter, challenging the convention that women with large breasts must wear a bra if their breasts sag. She also says that she has been inspired by, amongst others, Munroe Bergdorf, that arch race baiter, formerly nominated to ISAC some time ago. She also describes herself as an ‘influencer’ AKA a self-important, self- aggrandising cunt, who makes money from the cunts who follow her bullshit.

Nominated by Mystic Maven

Communism

Right, this is going to be brief as if I start, I’ll never fucking stop.

Picture the scene. I’m walking along the main thoroughfare in a major city in this country when what do I see across the street, but two dudes and a pole twenty-feet high with a CCCP flag waving in the breeze. You know, the red flag of old Soviet Russia with the hammer and sickle. Instantly I stare in disbelief. These dozy cunts cannot be promoting this crap surely!?

I cross the road and the table they are standing behind is covered in Communist , Marxist literature. Yip, you guessed it. They are promoting communism. I proceed to inform them that during the twentieth century over one hundred million people died under this system of government. Indeed, it killed more than fascism ever did. They looked ahead blankly with vague patronising smirks on their faces and didn’t react.

FFS, when will this madness end? When will people finally get rid of this deluded idea that Marxism, Communism and Socialism are kind, caring, benevolent systems? They starved, froze, beat and tortured to death millions. These creatures are complicit in trying to resurrect a murderous system that ruined the lives of millions.

Cunts.

Nominated by Mac McCunt