Rishi Sunak (1) – No Payrise for the NHS

A cunting for Rishi Sunak, who awards judges, civil servants, senior military officers, lazy teachers and knee-taking policemen with a pay rise for their ‘contributions’ during the Covid pandemic but not nurses, care workers, porters or cleaners who have been on the front line.

It’s a kick in the face and shows just how much of that clapping was empty virtue-signalling wank.

More evidence that Tory public spending is an inverted pyramid of more cash to the top and least useful.

Glad I never voted for the cunts.

Nominated by: Cuntamus Prime

“Professor” Jo Swinson (7)

(Couldn’t find anything appropriate for this nom, so here’s a pic of her tits instead – admin)

An incredulous mega CUNTING for mentally, dentally, challenged, mammary gifted, delusional former leader of the Limp Dems: Jo Swinson, who has be appointed Professor at “top” business management school, Cranfield School of Management, based at Cranfield University, Beds (no doubt formerly known as Bedford Technical College).

It amply demonstrates the calibre of the “academic” institution when an insane failure of a CUNT can be deemed worthy of a Professorship!!!

Nominated by: Sir Cuntalot 

Naming Names of the Innocent Until Proven

.

When the police arrest someone and they’re due to appear in court, the media will sometimes publish the defendant’s name before they’ve even been convicted.

Admittedly, a judge or the police themselves can withhold names. And for particular types of crime (rape allegations being the key one), the victim’s name is also withheld.

However, it still means that until found guilty, the accused could face having his/her name published across all forms of media, including his own Facebook page. This will no doubt arouse surprise, shock, anger etc. even though he still hasn’t been found guilty.

I mention this because I read in the local paper of some guy in Whitehaven who has been arrested and is due to appear in court accused of making 10,000 indecent images involving children. The article also mentions his full name, age and his general address.

If he is found not guilty, he is going to have to carry the stigma of being a “pee-do” around with him even though he’s innocent. His family, friends and possible workmates will always be suspicious.This could even lead to his own suicide!

My point being: should all names be withheld until the court has returned a verdict? If he is found guilty, then fuck him – throw him to the wolves. But if found innocent, then he should have the right of anonymity.

Nominated by: Technocunt

HS2 – No Thanks! (3)

Just a drive-by Cunting for HS2

Why bother? Most large companies have said that the days of people commuting to City jobs are largely over….more and more office-types will be working from home. Add in the massive predicted cost overruns and it seems even more bizarre to continue with a project that was questionable from the outset.

Nominated by: Dick Foxchaser-Fiddler

Petrol Station Shoppers

I want to nominate people who do their weekly shopping at the petrol station. They don’t buy fuel, but go up to the cashier with a basket full of overpriced crap and then stand there for a further ten minutes deciding how much money to waste on lottery tickets.

What happened to the good old fashioned petrol stations? Fill up, go to the small kiosk, pay the wizened old geezer in there, get your green shield stamps and fuck off. Those were the days…..

Nominated by: Mystic Maven