The race of those involved in the grooming of dozens of young girls in Manchester should not be the main focus in the scandal, a leading human rights lawyer has stated. Shoaib Khan says that although race was “an issue”, it was not the main one. He said the race of those involved did not form a key part of a report into how Greater Manchester Police (GMP) handled the grooming of teenage girls in the 2000s.
Operation Augusta was set up by the police force in 2004 after the death of Victoria Agoglia, a 15-year-old girl who reported being raped, but later died from a suspected overdose in 2003. She identified at least 57 victims of suspected grooming in Manchester. Only three people were convicted of related crimes at court. Mr Khan says the debate should focus on the failure of police to properly resource the investigation into grooming gangs, which the report highlighted, and not the race of those involved.
“I don’t think it’s important. The emphasis that is placed on their race and where they come from”.
Now, I’m no Sherlock fucking Holmes, but if you’re in policing work and you’re seeking people, whatever details you can get on their background, whether they’re white, they’re black, whether they’re tall, they’re short, whether they have white hair, whether they’re blonde, or whether they’re black is pretty fucking crucial. And guess what? They were predominantly Pakistani males. Also predominantly restaurant and takeaway workers from Rusholme. Surprise fucking surprise. But do we boycott these curry miles whatever city or town they are in? No we don’t, we flock to them and keep these paedos going with our hard earned pennies.
Don’t be naive, boycott the cunts.
Nominated by Fork Hunts
PayPal, they can be cunts.
Let’s start from the top, When I separated from Mrs B mkII I changed the details on my PayPal account to credit sales to the ex as we downsized.
I don’t sell for myself on Ebay so it wasn’t a problem, the funds went through to her and that was that.
Some years later I agreed to sell on behalf of a charity, again no problem the buyer buys whatever and the funds go to PayPal and PayPal passes them to the charity, or so I thought.
I received an e-mail from PayPal saying they would hold the funds for 21 days, again no problem.
Then after 21 days PayPal took the value of the sale from my current account and sent it to the charity!
The reason is simple, an unverified PayPal account, the phone number is obsolete, we don’t live at the address and super-duper my ex-wife’s name is on the account.
For over 3 months I have been fighting with what I can only describe as the most obstructive people I have ever dealt with, call centres that do not seem to have a grasp of English, to downright rude yanks.
Latest fob me off is waiting for a call back from a manager who may never bother returning my call.
Followed by 42 min hold just to be told they will only speak to my wife.
As a financial organisation it is like a vending machine that does not give out goods.
Massive bunch of cunts to a person.
My next port of call will be to get the charity and the buyer to contact them and explain the situation in the hopes of getting my money back (£106.00)
Nominated by Lord benny