Claims that ‘Whiteness” was responsible for the baby murders at Countess of Chester hospital.

Professional race baiter Dr (mickey mouse dept.) Shola Mos-Shogbamim claimed doctors’ suspicions about lucy Letby would’ve been taken more seriously if she wasn’t white. Dr Shola blacksplained:

“Lucy Letby exemplifies how [the] ideology of Whiteness keeps Britain in a chokehold. They believed her tears/denials even though evidence said otherwise, for no other reason than she’s white. A Black or Brown nurse would’ve been reported to the police immediately & sacked for suspicion.”

“Dr” Shola was backed up by Royal College of Nursing president Sheila Sobrany who said:

“If we are going to learn anything from this case we need to stop denying that racism is a serious issue in the NHS, this doctor (Dr Ravi Jayaram) would have been listened to if he was white and Lucy Letby would have been stopped sooner if she wasn’t white.”

Fuck me.

Spiked Online concluded:

“It’s hard to know where to begin with all this bullshit. First up, the notion that Jayaram wasn’t listened to because Letby is white and he is not is a grotesque mangling of the facts. Several consultants and clinicians, many of them white, raised the alarm about Letby. Dr Stephen Brearey, head consultant at the neonatal unit where Letby worked, was the first to alert hospital executives to the fact that babies were dying and Letby was the common denominator. His alleged abundance of white privilege clearly held no sway with hospital managers.”

Express

inews

Nominated by Minge Juice Bottler.

More on this topic by Cuntybollocks below.

Lucy Letby’s ‘white privilege’

Fuck me, even I didn’t expect the race grifting, anti white cunts to blame Lucy Letby’s murderous spree on her ‘white privilege’.

Like the author of the article linked in ‘Spiked’, I fucking should’ve known better.

Yes, it seems there are cunts out there who think that had Letby been black, she’d have been suspended much earlier.

What a load of fucking shit. Most employers I know, particularly fucking government ones like the NHS, are terrified of even criticising non whites, for fear of the old race card getting whipped out and the ensuing tribunals and inevitable (underserved) pay outs.

But I digress somewhat.

How fucking sick are these utter cunts, to be using dead babies to push more of their race baiting and grifting?

I’d happily see these cunts drowned in a bucket of piss.

Fuck off.

spiked

For decades now, our telephone network has been using analogue communications, which was fine its day but BT has decided it’s old hat and needs to be replaced by something called Digital Voice.

Basically, BT will be switching off the analogue network (Public Switched Telephone Network – PSTN) by the end of 2025 and moving everyone across to their new digital network – Digital Voice.

The rollout has been ongoing for the last 2 or 3 years beginning with the big cities and towns, followed by the carrot crunchers out in the sticks. This project has been backed by the government, who want to see the telecoms network up to date and in-line with other EU countries by 2026.

Essentially, Digital Voice (DV), will mean plugging your landline phone into your broadband router rather than your telephone socket. And from that point on you will be phoning people via what is known as Voice over IP (or Voip, for short).

This voip technology is not new as it is already in use via computer apps such as Skype and WhatsApp. However, if you have an old landline phone or router, it may not be compatible with Digital Voice, which may mean you having to buy a new phone and/or router!

BT is contacting its customers informing them that they will be moved over to DV in the next few months, and that they don’t have to do anything. However, you can refuse to be migrated across, although the downside is that come 2026 your landline phone will no longer work as the PSTN will be switched off by then.

Another problem with DV is that if there’s a power outage and there’s no electric to your home, you won’t be able to use your landline phone, especially for 999 emergencies.

Moreover, just because your landline phone will be integrated with your broadband, you will still have to pay a line rental bill, even though there is no line rental!

It also assumes that people actually have broadband, and that they have a mobile phone in case they need to make a 999 call should there be a power outage as mentioned earlier.

BT do offer online support for these issues, but if there’s a power outage and no internet, how the fuck can you get in contact with them, especially if you have no 4G signal!

Digital Voice, is basically a nice idea on paper, but a bag of bollocks in reality. But there’s sod all you can do to ignore it come 2026.

Which Link.

Nominated by : Technocunt

When some black-clad edgelord says we live in a simulation. I ask ‘of what?’

Is it COVID that has prompted this denial of reality? I don’t think it helped.

I think the simulation theorists are suffering the same malaise as what has lead to wokeness. They’ve been sitting comfortably for far too long.

As soon as things start going ‘wrong’ in society, such as the recession of 2008, or Brexit, or Trump, and recently COVID, you see the comments; We’re in a simulation.

Why was this sentiment never expressed before the Matrix films? When did the simulation begin? How do we know we’re in one? How much computng power is required? Who is running it?

if you believe in this, why not believe in God? After all, you can’t look outside the simulation to find the answers, why not just chalk it up as God did it? If the natural world is all in a simulation, the creator of that simulation is by our definition, supernatural.

The simulation theory begets more questions than it answers. Is the simulation one of many nested in a recurring sequence, like seeing yourself in a corridor of mirrors, but unable to tell if you are the real one. In the sequence of historical events, was it activated from a particular one, say 9/11? If so, why?

Just like with New Age beliefs, the simulation advocates mangle physics to support their theory. With the New Agers it’s quantum mechanics and exploiting quantum phenomena to justify the near-impossible (or as Nobel-prize winner Murray Gell-Man called their interpretation, quantum flapdoodle).
With the sims it’s the Holographic principle. Unfortunately, they refer to it without having any idea what it means; It relates to spatial dimensions within physics, and has nothing to do with The Matrix. Pointing to a possible multiverse isn’t helpful either. Why does a multiverse or multiple universes occupying time and space prove we live in a computer?

Returning to Sars-Cov 2, the upheaval it caused was not unprecedented in history, as the second world war happened, as did the Cold War. You can look at the influenza pandemic of 1918-1921 to see real upheaval.
As a child I lived under a far greater danger than Covid or the one Putin presents. In the early eighties, the Soviet Union had an estimated 3 gigatons-worth of nuclear firepower aimed at Britain alone. Had that kicked off, would the simulation reset, or continue into simulating a dull post-apocalyptic wasteland?

Buzzwords like the ‘new normal’ have helped fuel this paranoia though, and the general mistrust created by governments and denial of evidence around the lab leak theory, as well as poor trial methodology in labs testing vaccine efficacy (published by the BMJ and then denied or fact check by the BBC and Facebook) have shaken some people out of their endless consumerist sleepwalking.

History hasn’t finished. We are still in the world where stuff happens. Liberal democracy is evidently not the last word. This rippling across the fabric of society used to happen all the time throughout human history. The difference now is technology has allowed a much more heightened sensitivity.

This is not the new normal. Upheaval is normal. The last 30 years is abnormal, but only in the West. Strife has continued and wars waged throughout the nineties, and in Europe. Isn’t it telling how useless our media have become when they wring their hands and say the conflict in Ukraine is the first war on European soil since 1945.
What happened in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s?

Again, failings of institutions and their corruption have not exactly bred trust in the ‘reality’ presented to us. Conspiracies are rampant (some are useful), but we are not in the Matrix.

If we were, and a few people noticed, wouldn’t the programmer/s simply reset our memories? The media may try to do this with convenient omissions and forgetfulness, but a lot is down to incompetence, although during COVID, there was a lot of malice in the form of arrogance and hypocrisy, that sort of behaviour by the ruling class – politicians, media and academics – has sometimes led to revolution in the past.

If a revolution did occur in one of the Anglophone nations with strict regulations on COVID and Carbon emissions, would the sim advocates say it is programmed, or join in?

Given their complacency and disbelief in the ongoing upheavals of history, my guess is that they’d hide under the bed and say there’s no place like home.

futurism.com

Nominated by Cuntamus Prime

 
I am constantly being told that it was much cheaper in relative terms to buy a first property in my youth than it is today. I refute this. I had no silver spoon, no money from parents, nothing.

My first flat cost £16K in 1981. 4 times my salary with 10% deposit. As I write this, the cheapest 1-bed flat in my area today is £130K with 10% deposit. That remains about 4 times the average wage. So what has changed?

I’m not saying it is easy for them but I was prepared to scrimp and save enough for a deposit. I don’t think this generation is. They refuse to go without holidays abroad, designer clothes, flash cars and socialising. The phase cake and eat it springs to mind.

The article I have linked to insists that property prices have gone up in proportion to salaries. My example above suggests otherwise but even if this is true living costs have gone down, especially food. Also, interest rates were much higher in the 80s. And the problem of jumping on the housing market is not recent, it goes back beyond the pandemic when they were virtually zero. They were moaning then.

A young couple I know tell me I had it easy back in the day, houses were virtually given away. They are surprised to learn I had to move 30+ miles away to get a start as the cheapest property in the area in which I was born and bred was 8 times my wage and unaffordable. The first mistake they make is to look at prices back then and think “that’s nothing” not realising we were earning a pittance. Their 2nd mistake is to scorn any notion of saving. Putting away even £100 a week would amount to a deposit on my above example within a few years, especially now with prices dropping. Give up Just Eat deliveries, costa coffees and the odd night out, buy good quality 2nd-hand clothes from charity shops and take staycations. Make just a few sacrifices and you’d be surprised at what you can achieve.

However, the MSM encourages people to wallow in self-pity, to create victims whilst upholding the myth that previous generations never had it so good. And this generation laps it all up.

Or do ISACers think I’m being too harsh? What do you think?

Sky news

Nominated by Lord Helpus.