The wholy impartial BBC [14]

Can you believe that the BBC need cunting AGAIN?!
Well yes you probably do. Because they’re colossal cunts of the worst kind!

Their cuntitude is well documented amongst these great annals and I’m sure they’ll be many more displays of pure, unadulterated, lefty cuntishness to add to the pool in the future, but today it’s the defamation and slander of Trump that they’re on the block for…
I’m not a huge fan of Trump, but credit where credit’s due, and he’s doing a good job.
Better than killary could’ve managed anyway.
But this pisses off the lefties SO FUCKING MUCH that they now have to blatantly lie and unashamedly fraud the public, knowing full well that the vast majority will find out.
They’re so desperate to find something bad on trump that they’re willing to blatantly LIE to push their debunked narrative…

This is what trump said:

“We have people coming into the country, or trying to come in — and we’re stopping a lot of them — but we’re taking people out of the country. You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people. These are animals. And we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before.”

The BBC cunt (I don’t want to know the dumb cunts name) turned to Jordan Peterson and said:
“Just to explain, this is Donald Trump talking about illegal immigrants”.

So you have the answer.

You have the BBC’s interpretation of the answer.

But what was the question that he was answering?

Sheriff mimms:
“There may be MS-13 gang members that I know about, but if they don’t reach a certain criteria, I can’t tell ICE about them.” (Roughly).
( ICE is: Institute of Civil Engineers.
Oh sorry,
Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

So where do his remarks elude to immigration?

HE’S TALKING ABOUT MS-13 YOU CUNTS!

MS-13 ARE FUCKING ANIMALS AND EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM SHOULD BE …. well …. aherm …. suggestions below …

It’s not just the BBC (though they top the tables in cunt-ridden, lefty, bollocks peddlers).
EVERY fucking lefty in the western hemisphere has latched onto this and made the same accusation …

Fake news, fake news, fake news ….

Cunt news more like….

Nominated by deploythesausage

 

Posted in BBC

Tribute acts

Tribute acts. What a pile of wank.
What is the point? They are not the real thing so who are they fooling? Why not just be a covers band. Nothing wrong with that, but no we have to have tributes. And a lot of the cunts are tributes to what was utter shite in the first place – Spice Girls, Take That, Robbie fucking Williams. Just when you think popular music has reached rock bottom you see a Little Mix tribute ‘band’, where ‘band’ means karaoke singers.
And best of all there is a bunch of cunts called Definitely Maybe or something who are a tribute to the Beatles tribute act, Oasis. A tribute to a tribute.
Cunts one and all.

Nominated by Cuntstable Cuntbubble

Here in Suffolk we’ve got a festival called “The Nearly Festival” which is totally tribute bands There’s even an Ed Sheeran tribute act FFS!

Regrettably they didn’t call it “The Nearly Music Festival”. Probably too near the truth?

Nominated by Dioclese

Richard North

I crave the indulgence of the administrators while I get this off my chest, but I need to vent my spleen about Dr Richard North.

What? You never heard of him! North is a very important man who runs a blog called EU Referendum. I know he’s important because he told me so. “My site exceeds 100K daily hits – my comments sometimes reach 1000 in one day” he said. He was a little less charitable about mine however : “As for your blogroll, It is just as well you told me, otherwise I would not have noticed. Your traffic is so low that I can hardly recall getting a link from your site.” He’s no longer on my blogroll.

The problem arose when he wrote an article about Brexit. I felt the tone was such that he sounded like a Remainer, which surprised me as he is a long standing Leaver. So I said so and got savaged by several other readers, one of whom called me a ‘twat’. Result? The good Doctor banned me from commenting. So I asked him, very politely, why.

Personal comments about me and my motives, the author, are off limits.” Oh. Right. So I dared to disagree? Apparently, I “clearly set out to breach the most basic rules of the site“. Curious as to what the rules were, I looked for them and when I couldn’t find them anywhere I pointed this out to him. “Rules are for lawyers and small minds.” So that’s me told, then!

Such personal comments are considered ‘ad hominem‘ and not tolerated. So he banned me. I pointed out that he doesn’t seem to have the same problem when writing about other people. Well, that’s simple. “Of course the “ad hominem” rule doesn’t apply to me. I am the owner and moderator of the site and it falls to me to herd the cats and maintain some sort of discipline. Tu quoque is a pathetic, playground defence.” Dr North likes latin words although he doesn’t seem to know that the plural of ‘forum’ is ‘fora’ not ‘forums’.

All this is in a string of emails so if you’re thinking of suing me, Dr North, everything in italics is cut and paste from your replies which I have kept.

Also, since banning me, he has published a not entirely accurate comment on his site (click to read) calling me an “ignorant fool” and alluding to my being “blinded by prejudice”. Of course, I have no right of reply to this because he’s banned me. So this nomination is my reply.

I hope he’s truly happy spending “more than 12 hours a day” in front of his screen running his echo chamber, enjoying “immunity from having his motives questioned” and pretending that he is writing his blog “as an investment in our future” rather than a vanity project.

So to sum up: an arrogant, self important, pompous, rude hypocrite. Eche homo. (That’s Latin too!).

Nominated by Dioclese

UN Human Rights Council

A cunting for the United Nations Human Rights Council.

Below are some of the members:
Afghanistan
Angola
China
Cuba
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Egypt
Iraq
Kenya
Pakistan
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)

There are also some actual democracies on the council including the UK but no longer the USA. Trump sees it for what it is. How can any of the countries listed above decide on Human Rights? Shitholes of repression one and all.

Israel is often criticised by this lot. Fair enough you might say, Israel does have a lot to answer for. But compared to this lot it is a beacon of fairness and good practise.
I cannot understand the hypocrisy and pretence that the UK or any other democracy demonstrates by rubbing shoulders with this lot regarding human rights.

Cunts.

Nominated by Cuntstable Cuntbubble

Ken Livingstone [7]

Ken Livingstone deserves another cunting.

So, Red Ken has finally quit the Labour party. This, nasal voiced, squinty eyed, newt shagging piece of shit has been on suspension from the Labour party for the past few months, over yet another anti-Semitic outburst. His resignation letter contained this gem, and I quote;

“I do not accept the allegation that I have brought the Labour Party into disrepute – nor that I am in any way guilty of anti-Semitism. I abhor antisemitism, I have fought it all my life and will continue to do so”.

This guy is the poster boy for self delusion. Abhor anti-Semitism? Fuck off Ken, you have a long, sad, public history of making anti-Semitic remarks. And you have NOT fought it all your life, you lying cunt. The shiniest gem though, came today (Tuesday 22nd May), when he claimed that Seumas Milne wrote his tweets, and didn’t tell him NOT to talk about Hitler. What…the actual…fuck? Ken, you’re 72 years old for fucks sake. You shouldn’t NEED to be told not to talk about Hitler. We all know that the left are retarded, but Livingstone is taking the piss here. He clearly thinks we’re all as thick as he is.

The only thing more disgusting than Livingstone himself, is Corbyn’s response to his old friend’s anti-Semitism. He’s spent months doing absolutely fuck all about Livingstone, probably in the hope it would all dye down and go away.

“Ken Livingstone’s resignation is sad after such a long and vital contribution to London and progressive politics, but was the right thing to do.”

That’s all Corbyn has to say about the resignation of his old mate. Livingstone is the epitome of everything that is wrong with Labour, a liar, a bigot, a vile, nasty and generally unpleasant excuse for a human being. And under his mate, Comrade Corbyn, his ilk have not only thrived, they are increasing, both in number and unpleasantness. Livingstone and his clones in momentum and the Labour party, are humanoid filth.

Nominated by QDM