The Attraction of Islam

Just been reading Belloc and the ‘Mohammadan Heresy’. He details how swiftly it spread.

But not only because it won battles (which it did) but also because of its simple teaching.

The geographic spread is astonishing though. Within the a lifetime after the death of the Prophet it had conquered Syria and a great swaith of North Africa. Not long after that it had a foothold in Europe. All of Spain went Muslim in a short time. The Balkans and Mesopotamia.

It really was astonishingly quick.
But Belloc argues and I agree with him that it was the simple teaching of a ‘One God’ that was attractive to people.

The law was simplified as well. Simple ‘debt forgiveness’ if you became a Muslim.

It had actually a reasonably ‘light tough’ on people’s lives as well. it wasn’t at the beginning as Authoritarian and rigid as it’s now.

Learning was high and encouraged.

What we must always remember about Islam (and the danger of it) is that it is a Christian Heresy.

The only heresy that has sprung from outside the Church.

As aways with heresies Islam is a simplification of the Christan message. That is why in part it is popular.

See you live a good life and you die and on Judgement Day (specific Christian teaching) you will be judged.

All the old Testament is taken as read. All the stories of and Personages are just lifted from the Bible into into the Quran as it were. Abraham, Moses

And so with the Gospels. Jesus is given the highest possible reverence. And so is Miriam (Mary).

But he changed things.
See link below.

Yes very similar to Calvinistic Heresy. John Calvin was obsessed with the idea of the Providence of God. Same with Mohammad.

Said it before-that emphasis on the sovereignty of God can be very dangerous.

Can be summed up there’s no room for Man in it. There is no ‘relationship’ with Allah.

That can make for very unhappy and dissatisfied people.

Sometimes they can explode.

EWTN News Link

Nominated by: Miles Plastic

COP27 (2) and Climate Reparations

After listening to the grand finale of Cunt 27, I thought how much is the UK paying out in total

Our government is a cunt, we need a tally (keep Diane Abbott away from the sums) of how much we are actually spending on not the UK.

We can start with COP27, there has been an agreement to set up a loss and damage fund so richer nations can shell out for climate related issues, how much are we paying
This is in addition to our funding to the developing nations to help them not to burn carbon
Then onto the channel invaders, 2 billion and counting, that is just room and board, what about the costs of picking up, processing and medical expenses and how much are the legal costs.
The Afghan refugees, no idea but it can’t be cheap to house the 15000 or so who were evacuated
The Ukrainian refugees, 150,000? brought in an their accommodation with anyone who would house them at £350 per month
The costs of supporting Ukraine in the war effort
Last but not least the Overseas Aid, 0.5% of GDP, is that on top of all the above, who knows, there really needs to be a grand total so the British people can see how our tax is being spent when it comes to anything not the UK.

My guess, it must be in the region of 20 billion, nice to know that we have some spare cash to give away

Sky News Link

Nominated by: Sick of it

And supported by: Guzziguy

Admin, perhaps I might be allowed to add to this cunting.

It would appear that whitey has agreed to cough up yet more money to those who have allegedly suffered due to climate change which may or may not be due to industrialisation.

Any balance sheet should include benefits those ‘damaged’ nations gained from the efforts of the nasty ,hard working white people who provided the entire world with the steam turbine, penicillin, computers, the internet and thousands of other inventions which allowed them to extend their dismal life expectancies.

Whitey is still working on cures for the gifts of the third world to humans namely Aids, Ebola and monkey pox.

Peter Tatchell (4)- Up his Own Arse!

I’m sick of this sword swallower!

I get it.
Your gay.
I don’t give a fuck!!
Quit your fuckin whining.

Always making a big song and dance about his sexuality,
People say he’s brave.
I don’t.
I say he’s a shit stirrer,
A trouble causer,
And a boring little cunt.

He’s moaning about Quatar and it’s record on LGBTQ rights (zzzzzz?)
Just don’t go,
Stop telling others how to live,
Thought you’d like them?
They wear nighties.

And I think he’s a wrong un .
Not my first choice as babysitter.

GBNews News Link

Nominated by: Miserable northern cunt

The Living Wage

For some reason I always think of those two other words “Affordable Housing,” every time I hear this mentioned.

Anyway, soon to rise to £10.40/hour. It’s been so exciting, getting those little payments in gradual increments, over the past few years, that my employer, like so many others, has had no control over. So for all those others on the bottom rung of the pay scale, who have actually bothered to get off their arses, like me, and go and do an honest days work, then good show!

Back in 2008, after being made redundant a number of times, I made a career change from engineering. There was a “Living Wage,” back then, but my money had always been, well above. In my area however, Work was drying up. So I made the move to security, which turned out to be a different ballgame.

Security companies, as I soon found out are a notorious bunch of tight fisted cunts, and some even seem to begrudge paying out this so called “Living Wage” to it’s employees, when it is a legal requirement. Mine is no exception. I take all the risks, and if I ‘fuck up,’ like some of the poor chaps I have worked with, could end up being hospitalised. It’s a dangerous world out there, and for all my efforts, I get a pretty dismal pay cheque, each month in return.

My head honcho, so I have learnt, pays himself a “Living Wage” of some £400/hour, for running his ‘family business.’ A greedy cunt by all accounts, and the word greedy just happens to rhyme with his surname.

The company is all ‘Money Money Money,’ that doesn’t give a toss about it’s ‘Bread Winning Workforce.’ I don’t care any more, now that I am getting ever closer to retirement. As long as those cunts at the D.W.P. don’t at the last minute, get the bright idea of chucking another year on top of that last one, something that still really pisses me off. It’s also a bit late now, for any more career changes.

So having worked for 50 years, it will be ‘Gardening Leave,’ and ‘Light Duties’ for me.

That final working day, just can’t come quick enough! The “Living Wage? Get to fuck!

Nominated by: Lord Scunthorpe

Menopausal “Women” in the NHS (23)


Health Chief, Amanda Pritchard has announced that middle-aged women working for the NHS will be allowed to work from home, flexible-working hours and/or be offered light duties as they cope through the menopause.

A report also suggests that the menopause costs the British economy something like £10bn a year in sick leave.

Rather than focus on reforming the NHS in order to reduce the massive cost burden to the taxpayer, as well as trying to improve waiting times, operations and bed availability, this stupid cunt chooses to ruffle feathers by declaring that middle aged women should be prioritised.

Of course this will piss off younger women in the NHS who will be left to pick up any extra workload the middle-aged brigade can no longer cope with. It also means male colleagues might get a bit annoyed because we too go through some form of equivalent menopause at that age, although its never really taken very seriously to a wider public.

Then of course there’s the matter of transwomen – you know, the men identifying as wimminz. Will they seek the same offer even though technically they don’t have a cervix?

The NHS is already struggling in lots of areas, not least staff shortages. But dear old Amanda doesn’t want to be troubled by that complication. And does she not realise that menopause can last anything up to 8 or 9 years! Does that mean affected women will be able to work from home on full pay for almost a decade without fear of losing their job?

As per usual with the NHS top brass, they get their priorates all wrong, but still demand more cash from the government.

Telegraph Link.

Nominated by : Technocunt