Dead Pool (185)

Congratulations to Freddie the Frog who correctly predicted legendary golf commentator Peter Alliss would be the next to pop his clogs aged 89

 

On to Deadpool 185:

 

The rules:

 

1) Pick 5 famous Cunts you think will conk out next.It is first come first serve.You can always be a cunt and steal other peoples nominations from previous pools (Like Black and White Cunt frequently does.

 

2) Anyone who nominates the World’s Oldest man or woman is a cunt who will be ignored.

 

3) It must be a famous cunt we have heard of.

 

4) If your pick has already been taken, tough tits, it’s first come first served (only because we can’t be arsed to check )

 

My Picks(GTC):

 

Larry King

Tom Smith (rugby)

Dai Davies

Slick Woods

Dick Van Dyke

Dead Pool (183)

Congratulations to Captain Magnanimous who correctly predicted that cheating cunt and (admittedly) legendary former footballer and manager Diego Maradona would be the next to cark it. He was 60 and died of heart failure.

 

On to Deadpool 183:

 

The rules:

 

1) Pick 5 famous Cunts you think will conk out next.It is first come first serve.You can always be a cunt and steal other peoples nominations from previous pools (Like Black and White Cunt frequently does.

 

2) Anyone who nominates the World’s Oldest man or woman is a cunt who will be ignored.

 

3) It must be a famous cunt we have heard of.

 

4) If your pick has already been taken, tough tits, it’s first come first served (only because we can’t be arsed to check )

 

My picks (GTC)

 

Slick Woods

George Alagiah

Tom Smith (rugby)

Dai Davies

Jake “The Snake” Roberts

Accusations of “Trolling”


It seems that whenever there is a particularly divisive subject, we get the accusation of “trolling”. I can’t see that it is “trolling” to have a viewpoint and be willing to express it.
It seems to me that sometimes people just can’t accept or even live with the fact that not everyone agrees with them…endless reams of justification of their point with the odd little dig thrown in to try and elicit a response…what comes if they still don’t brow-beat their “foe” into submission…a “Cunt’s Corner” style meltdown perhaps?

I admit that I sometimes post a reply with the intention of stirring things up a bit…and maybe occasionally getting people to consider that there maybe is another side to the argument that may be worth considering. Maybe I’m the “troll” rather than someone who just puts an alternative view without particularly looking to stir things up?

Worrying about someone getting too many “tickies” indeed…Ffs.

Nominated by Dick Fiddler

..and this follow up from our old friend Dioclese who’s an expert on trolls on this site –

From my point of view the difference is that debate is fine but baiting is trolling. You can make a point without name calling and insults…

BE MOST EXCELLENT TO ONE ANOTHER – Boss Admin