Yet again, we have mad fuckers blowing themselves up on the streets of a European city in the name of their fanatical interpretation of the mindless cult of Islam. But, almost before the blood on those streets is dry, cunts like Simon Jenkins in the Guardian are writing crap about how the real problem is the West and its attitude towards the Middle East and the so-called Muslim community in Europe. Check out Comment is Free on the Guardian’s website and Voices at the Independent; they are both full of articles that basically blame “racism” or “Islamophobia” or Western foreign policy for the events in Brussels.

These attacks seem to be coming along with increasing frequency at the moment. But as soon as they do, “progressive” twats are out in force with the standard narrative – Islam is a religion of peace, not all Muslims are terrorists, it’s the West’s fault, blah, blah, fucking blah, ad bloody nauseum. Do these cocksuckers have a template that they cut-and-paste every time some micro-cocked Islamist blows himself up in the name of his imaginary friend?

I do not need to be told over and over again by “progressive” faggots that most Muslims are not terrorists. I fucking know that, I’m not a fucking retard. However, whilst it is clear that most Muslims are not terrorists, it is also clear that most terrorists (at the moment) are Muslims. This is a fact, it is not “racist” or “Islamophobic” to say so.

The problem all the apologists make is to confuse “Islam” (or even “Islamism”) with “Muslims” and they use these two words interchangeably. How many times must it be said that Islam is an IDEA and Muslims are PEOPLE, they are not the same thing. I have read the Koran from cover to cover and it is anything but a peaceful book. It is totally incoherent, repetitive and dull; with the constant theme being that you will go to Hell if you don’t slavishly follow Allah’s petty (and often arbitrary) rules. I simply could not find the parts of this mad book that “progressive” twats insist make Islam a “religion of peace.”

But “Islam” is not the same thing as “Muslim.” Muslims are people with the same strengths and weaknesses that non-Muslims have; they are not robots who have downloaded some software called Islam that controls and dictates their every action. Some Muslims are clearly violent and want to impose their childish ideas on the rest of us. Most Muslims, I’m sure, want to be left alone to look after their own families and live their own lives. Neither of these types of people means Islam is a peaceful religion; it just means that some people take Mo the kiddie-fiddler’s violent rantings more seriously than others.

What is racist is the way people are labelled as “Muslims” because of their ethnicity, particularly by “progressive” twats. Perhaps folks from MENA or parts of South Asia are mostly Muslim, but is that really their free choice? Or is it because of the oppressive nature of those societies, where not being Muslim (at least outwardly) can be a death sentence? Perhaps because people from certain ethnic minorities have been abandoned (by “progressive” twats) to the tender mercies of greasy-bearded paedophiles in the cause of identity politics that they have the “Muslim” identity forced on them? Or they have no way of escaping this oppressive ideology?

One way I do agree with the “progressive” twats is when they say that the majority of victims of ISIS et al are Muslims. Only I would broaden this idea to say that the majority of the victims of Islam itself are Muslims – women forced into abusive marriages and into wearing tents; young girls who have their genitals brutally mutilated; gaylords who are murdered; schoolchildren who are beaten for not banging their heads on the ground often enough or for forgetting some of Mo the kiddie-fiddler’s ravings. These are exactly the people we should be HELPING to escape from the mindless cult of Islam. But any ex-Muslim who dares raise any of these issues is immediately denounced as an “Islamophobe” or (hilariously) as a “racist” by – you guessed it – “progressive” twats.

I ask who the real racist is – the knuckle-dragging BNP skinhead who hates all “Pakis” and can’t tell the difference between a Muslim and a Sikh? Or the “progressive” twat in his zillion pound house in an all-white enclave of Islington who refuses to hold those funny brown people in their colourful clothes and their exotic religion to the same ethical standards as the rest of us?

I’m going to sign off now but I’m sure I’ll rant about the next apologist of Jihad I read after the next Islamist terrorist attack. See you next Friday probably…

Nominated by: Cunt’s Mate Cunt