Early on thursday morning (04.55am) they’re showing the film ‘Flash Gordon’ on the Sky Villains channel. The Sky Guide description reads:

“This film has outdated attitudes, language and cultural depictions which may cause offence today. Hero Flash Gordon races to save Earth from the Emperor Ming.”

Are they serious? This is a PG film. It’s ‘Flash Gordon’ (1980), not ‘Flesh Gordon’ (1974).

You could say that every film made before 1970 has outdated attitudes. Why would the idiots at Sky think we need this warning?

I find their description offensive. Fuck off, Sky.

Nominated by: Allan 

Hold tight to your corsets, Dame Keir Starmer, it seems, bright eyed an bushy tailed one of the old waxworks of the past is after your job. I refer of course, to the great “charity” worker, defender of South Shields, and gutless back-stabber David Miliband.

Old Dave has appeared for two consecutive weeks in that bastion of New Labour newspeak, The London Standard free newspaper. Last week, he was wittering on about dining in America in social distancing days (made it harder for hi to lick the arsehole of his host), now, having been in the States for years, the bumptious one has denied the shenanigans of 2017 (doubtess he has a crystal ball):

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/david-miliband-jeremy-corbyn-labour-party-2017-election-a4520941.html

How would the little motherfucker know?. I am no fan of Corbyn but it was undeniable that there were certain “ultra Bairites” in the Labour party who put the boot in every day from 2015 onwards, including Wes Streeting, Neil Coyle, Bendover Brdshaw, Yvette Sugartits Cooper, and every one of the cunts who dissed him were right-wingers. Blair himself was forever mincing about laying down the poison.

I suspect the truth is Mili is fed up with his “charity” work and realises that by becoming a shadow minister, and the extras he can cream off as “expenses” he would be better off with the movers and shakers (on in the Starmer case, the mincers and benders) in the I-can-be-whatever-you-want-me-to-be-duckie Labour party.

Just as Starmer hung on for grim death in a shadow cabinet he had nothing in common with, till he got the chance to replace old Steptoe if he is daft enough (oh yes he is!) to have mincing Mili back he will go the same way when Starmer loses in 2024. I am sure Jimmy Purnell head of BBC news and “education” would bend over backwards to help his little friend. After all, he was his co-conspirator in 2009.

Nominated by: W. C. Boggs 

Ben and Jerry’s – my first ever CUNTING!

After years of regular viewing/laughing on this great site, I’ve decided to break my cherry on Ben and Jerry! ?

B&J are cunts aren’t they?

According to the MSM Sky cunts (link below) BJs stated that the government is showing “a lack of humanity” whilst dealing with all the illegal immigrants whom are pitching up on the shores of the south in little rubber boats. They are bringing plague and all sorts of other vile shit back into our country which has long since been eradicated in the UK with them too – just what we fucking need at this time.

There are a host of reasons why this situation boils my piss but one reason I don’t see articulated often is what would happen if a boat load of peacefuls pitch up in a dingy armed to the teeth having brought ‘A Kays’ with them in their little boat, and go on a “spree”. You can buy A Kay’s in street markets in some of the shitholes these “migrants” spawn from for Christs sake. I bet the good folks in Em eye five are SHITTING THEIR DACKS over this prospect.

Are we only catching a small proportion of these cheesedicks? How many are getting through undetected? I shudder to think. Anyway, Ben and Jerry’s should stick to making fucking ice cream and pull its nose out of all the woke bullshit they are spouting – the ice cream making CUNTS.

https://news.sky.com/story/ben-jerrys-tackle-home-secretary-over-migrant-crossings-and-get-a-chilly-response-12047420

Nominated by: Napoleon Boner

…and seconded by Family Farter 

Ben and Jerry’s ice cream co.

A raspberry ripple cunt nom please, not for the sickly teeth destroying indulgence, although I am partial to bit of Haagen Dazs, but for yet another preposterous virtue signalling shit show via Twitter titter shitter shatter.
This time the honourable Priti Patel is the target by this company over her policy to bring to an end the endless flow of migrant boats in the English Channel, and too fucking right she is as well.

https://metro.co.uk/2020/08/12/priti-patel-attacks-ben-jerrys-ice-cream-row-migrant-crossings-13117320/

More than 4,000 migrants have reached the UK this year by crossing the English Channel in small boats, with almost 600 of the cunts arriving between Thursday and Sunday. Wow, with that level of success, we can probably expect another 4000 before 2020 is done and dusted, unless the home secretary’s plans to make our borders stronger works.

But of course this is downright inhumane according to Ben and Jerry’s
sanctimonious Twatter spokesperson who seems to believe that we should grant asylum to every cunt that manages to get here. Are all these dinghy locusts known for their love of ice cream I wonder? No? Then fuck off Ben and Jerry’s unless you’re prepared to fund the building of hundreds of thousands of new homes on brown field sites for your beloved newcomers that have travelled through several countries and crossed twenty odd miles of sea to ‘seek refuge’. Yeah, my arse they have! Dirty Opportunist Cunts.

I have been watching and thoroughly enjoying Simon Schama’s 17 episode “A History of Britain”, first broadcast in 2000-2002 and produced in part by our wonderfully impartial BBC.

Although every episode is quite fascinating, and Schama’s conversational style certainly has a gripping quality that pisses all over the tedious history lessons I had back in the day at school, there does appear to be a common thread running though each episode – class conflict!

Kings, queens and emperors have ruled this country over the last 2000 years. Most of them coming from rich and powerful dynasties, and therefore use the instruments of money, influence and obedience through fear to keep the Little People in their place.

All through the centuries the poor have always been poor, have never had a voice, were treated like scum, forced to fight wars with little reward, and were exploited and abused for the sake of social standing and monetary profit by their so-called betters.

Men, women and children suffered horrendous and inhuman treatment during their miserable existence. Moreover, the landowners, the gentry, the politicians and the factory bosses were more concerned about maximising profits rather than worrying about the appalling treatment & living conditions of the lower orders.

But another key aspect of this history lesson in class division, which still exists today, is that 99% of the poor were white!

And as for the British Empire – well that was just a repeat of what was going on in Britain but further away! Travel to India or the West Indies, exploit the poor, force them to work for peanuts, treat them like shit but make sure you make enough profit out of them before they die! And in that scenario 99% of the poor were non-white!

In summary, therefore, it was the poor of all colours that suffered the most under centuries of British monarchical rule, and not just a carefully selected period of time when the rich exploited Africa, the West Indies and India. Which is something modern teaching methods is trying to revise into a far more shameful episode in our history rather than looking at the bigger picture!

White people suffered
Black people suffered

The common factor being that both ethnicities were gut-wrenchingly poor!

And yet this would appear to be pretty low on the list of priorities for the “caring/sharing” Woke Generation, who seem to think poverty, slavery and hardship have always been the exclusive domain of the BAMEs

Nominated by: Technocunt

This is my first nom so, if it passes muster, be gentle.

Although I do mean packaging in general, I am mainly targeting retail packaging and although I am no packaging Nazi there are two specific examples which have incensed me, one a couple of years ago and one this week.

As an example of what I deem to be good packaging, I recently bought a new brush motor for a vacuum cleaner. This was sent from the manufacturers, an engineering company, and was in a box that was only just big enough to contain the motor and the folded-up invoice/receipt. This seems to be fairly par for the course, they waste as little as possible. It was also free delivery.

Then you have the two examples of retail and it’s a shame you can’t post pictures on this site. (You can but it’s a bit of a faff sometimes – Day Admin)

One was from Amazon. They’re not exactly known for appropriate packaging but this was in another league. It was a saw blade. 21”x1.5” and obviously flat. It came in a box. This box was 24”x15”x8” and contained the blade along with a mile of brown paper filler. What was wrong with wrapping it in cardboard tape and then just shoving it through the letterbox? I wrote to them but, of course, they ignored me.

The second was this week. I bought a face mask online because I liked the design and received it yesterday. This is a face mask, the size of a folded handkerchief but thinner. It came in an opaque polythene bag. This bag was in a 9”x7”x6” box with fucking BUBBLEWRAP!

I emailed the company concerned saying as follows:

I’d like to register my utter disgust at being forced to pay £4.99 for delivery.
For a face mask.
Which was packed in an opaque polythene bag.
Which was in a large box.
Which was basically full of BUBBLE WRAP.
I have a degree in Textile and Knitwear Technology and I can assure you that cotton fabric doesn’t break, explode, crush or otherwise get damaged by being sent through the post.
It could have been sent in the polythene bag.
With an address label and a 2nd class stamp on it.
For 65p.
NOT £4.99!

I wonder if they’ll reply and how they will try to justify ripping me off for P&P.

Nominated by moggie63