Geoffrey Cox (2)

The former Attorney General appears to have forgotten what he said last year and joined the turkeys.

He will be voting against the Internal Market Bill, as it stands, on the grounds that it will do “unconscionable” damage to Britain’s international reputation.

Isn’t that laughable when you see how the EU have acted over the last 4 years?! Or is he just moaning because he was sacked from the Cabinet in February’s reshuffle??!!

Boris Johnson really has made himself look pathetic and he needs to get his arse in gear otherwise we all better get ready for civil war…

Nominated by: Cunt me in

(for clarity https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54142845 – DA)

Q Anonymous

Imagine.

You stroll down the local with a mate, sit down with a pint and discuss how well Boris is doing and what a fine chap that Sir Kreme Kracker is. Normal stuff.

Then your friend turns to you and casually exclaims that Michelle Obama allegedly has a penis. How would you react? Ask if he’s had a bang on the head recently? She has children. “Fakes” he says.

But he goes on: the Clintons allegedly run a paedophile ring which centres around the basement of a city pizza parlour. And that many leading citizens of the world drink the blood of babies. And Trump was the saviour voted in to rid the planet of this scourge.

By this time you might be recommending that your chum visits a good doctor. Yet he is implacable. Where does this inside information come from?

Q Anonymous!

An online movement with millions of members. Not just youngsters but people of all ages. There is almost certainly somebody in your circle who believes this garbage as there is in mine. He assured me it is all true and I have been too brainwashed by mainstream media to accept it. He also thinks Covid is a scam, designed to control the population. (That’s working to plan then!)

Now I understand why many many folk no longer believe what the BBC churns out. Nor do most of us on this site. But Q-A makes David Icke and his lizard creatures look feasible and quite charming.

With so many falling prey to conspiracy theories, are we witnessing a modern form of mass hysteria?

Nominated by: Lord Helpuss 

…and seconded by: General Cuntster (Deceased)

I call this “Cunt…Counter Cunt”:

Imagine sitting down with a friend and he tells you that a mysterious Jewish financier named Jeffery Epstein was part of an international ring of pedophiles.

Imagine he told you that President Bill Clinton allegedly flew multiple times on Epstein’s private jet, the “Lolita express” to his private “Pedo Island.”

Imagine further that your friend said that the Duke of York was a friend of Jeffery Epstein and had visited and indeed stayed at his New York Town House. He then puts forth the notion that there are/were pictures of the Duke with an under aged victim.

And try to imagine further he said, that Epstein counted many powerful and influential friends like Microsoft founder, Bill Gates or prominent attorney Alan Dershowitz or film maker Woody Allen or former Senator George Mitchell or a whole host of other powerful people world wide.

Your friend goes on to have you imagine that when arrested, Epstein cut a deal with the prosecutors that granted immunity to all these people. But then somehow, he managed to get arrested again. And isolated and depressed he kills himself in prison.

Nobody would believe any of that. Right?

But your friend isn’t done:

Imagine that your friend goes on to tell you that British socialite Ghislane Maxwell…daughter of British media mogul Robert Maxwell…(who himself died in mysterious circumstances)…(she) is a friend of Prince Andrew…and was Epstein’s closest associate. And that she was arrested…hiding in plain sight…in a multi million dollar estate in New Hampshire, and is now being held in the same prison Epstein offed himself in.

As your friend goes on, he explains that there is a conspiracy of sexual degenerates who are producing television programs that normalize tran-sexual girls and are producing movies that sexualize little “cuties”.

These movies, he says are to be shown on television and on the world’s largest subscription service in furtherance of their degenerate schemes.

As your friend dives further into the “conspiracy” theory, he details how a bunch of “deep state” operatives conspired to remove the President of the US by fabricating evidence and making up stories of his involvement with foreign interests to rig the US election. And when they couldn’t remove him legally, he opines that they have openly fomented insurrection and revolution in the streets.

He then digresses briefly to explain how these same people tried to thwart the the referendum calling for Britain to leave the EU. And failing to defeat the referendum, they then tried to get the politicians to reverse the actions called for in the vote.

Your friend get back to the point; a few in the government are starting to talk. But the degenerates have allies everywhere. To discredit the the leakers and to hide their schemes, they get a corrupt and complicit media to orchestrate a cover up by starting a disinformation campaign. They (the media) exaggerate the claims made by your friend (and anyone else) and in a classic case of misdirection they put forth their own outrageous claims as the beliefs of these conspiracy nuts. Then they ridiculed any one who believes them or anyone who questions them, thus “having their cake” and “eating it too” (as the saying goes).

You don’t want to be rude but you think to yourself; My friend has lost it! A mysterious Jewish financier with powerful international friends in government, business and entertainment running an international pedophile ring? They and their partisan agents are trying to thwart the will of the people and remove a sitting President who opposes them?

That’s rich! Nobody in their right fucking mind would believe that. LOL!

(Except maybe Aleister Crowley.)

The views expressed in this rebuttal anti-cunting are not necessarily those of the author.

(But then again…)

(As a precaution I’ve had to throw in the odd “allegedly” here and there, even if the actual allegation is true. – DA)

Yesterday’s Cunts – Major & Blair

There’s an old chestnut which asserts that ‘you can’t keep a good man down’. Sadly it appears that you can’t keep a cunt down either. Somebody’s kicked a stone over and allowed those shifty chancers John ‘The Grey Man’ Major and Anthony ‘Phony Tony’ Blair to slither out into the light again.

In a joint ‘Remoaning’ attack on the government, the Gruesome Twosome maintains that the United Kingdom Internal Trading Bill overrides certain ‘key aspects’ of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement, including the protocol on Northern Ireland. Writing in ‘The Sunday Times’, they claim that ‘it is wrong in principle and dangerous in practice. It goes far beyond the impact on Ireland and negotiations for a trade deal, crucial though they are. It questions the very integrity of our nation’.

Mmm… ‘principle’? ‘Integrity’? A strange choice of words from the adulterous hypocrite ‘Mr Back to Basics’, the man who prorogued Parliament in 1997 to prevent debate on the expenses scandal, and who denied the people a say on the Maastricht Treaty. Good ol’ ‘Honest John’.

A strange choice of words from ‘Mr Dodgy Dossier’, the man who took the nation into what is widely regarded as an illegal war, and who many claim should be answering charges in front of a court in The Hague. Oh and let’s not forget those *nudge nudge* peerages in return for cash to New Labour *nudge say no morwarh*…

A strange choice of words from two weasels who’ve consistently argued against the will of the people with regard to the Brexit referendum, and who campaigned for a ‘People’s Vote’ because the referendum didn’t produce the outcome that they wanted, and indeed expected.

No, what’s irresponsible and dangerous is the persistent meddling and whining by a couple of yesterday’s men; two slippery has-beens who claim to accept that we’ve left the EU but who deep down want it to continue to hold dominion over us, because they sold their souls to Brussels long ago.

Well *cough* ‘gentlemen’, you both had your day, so now you’re left to struggle constantly with coming to terms with your utter irrelevance. I don’t think many of us will look back on your contributions with much in the way fondness or gratitude. To quote from a classic Kern and Fields song, ‘you’re as cold as yesterday’s mashed potatoes’. Just shut up and fuck off already.

Nominated by: Ron Knee

Women…

Yes those ultimate cunts…with cunts.

What is it with them? Most on here know abaaaht me and my fondness for the ladies but they are proper cunts.

They act all nice when you meet them, plenty of dick sucking, put in loads of effort in the bedroom…they even get on top and then cook you a nice breakfast in the morning and clean the house without moaning.

Then they decide you are not worthy of their duties as a woman and start trying to turn you into a weak cunt, constantly criticising, never satisfied, and generally being a cunt, and some even turn into fat cunts and still act like demanding cunts when they have no right to after letting themselves go so much. They then get annoyed and watch you when a younger, better looking model is in the vicinity. They then wonder why men cheat on them.

The fact that they have cunts should act as the ultimate warning to any man finding his way in this sometimes cruel world.

They always get their own way it seems in court etc, Police will always take their side, and they can get away with being psychos.

Then you get the gold digging types who some sad, fat cunt thinks loves them…I suppose they deserve to be taken for all they have.

You then get the ones who want to be the man in the relationship and control everything from the finances to the sexual activities (if they allow sex that is)…and some sad/weak cunts put up with it.

Women are one of the ultimate puzzles in this life… beautiful, sexy, can make a man feel he’s the greatest man alive, the right one can make a man exceed his ability and realise ambitions he thought he could not, and yet can also drive a poor cunt to become a shadow of himself, strip a man’s wealth and make his life hell.

I don’t aim this cunting at any of the female cunters on here as they have proven their top woman credentials.

I have been thinking abaaaaht life and I sometimes think I was born in the wrong times, I should have been born as a great General with a wife who understood my need for a few mistresses as any great man would require.

Be careful who you select cunters and go fuck yourselves!

Nominated by: Black and White Cunt 

The Turin Shroud

Those Who Say The Turin Shroud Is A Medieval Forgery.

This is one of my ‘There is no conflict between Science and Religion’ kind of Noms. Only in this case it is almost as if the skeptics are believers, believers skeptics. Let me explain;

We all remember the famous photograph of the blackboard with the dates ‘1260 -1390’ written on it. That was result of the carbon dating. It was a medieval forgery. Science has proved it. End of story. Everyone went home.

Years passed.

‘But I want to know how that medieval guy did it’ Barrie Schwortz the Chief Documenting Photographer of the group of scientists that were allowed to study the Shroud , ‘What were we looking at’.

You see gentle reader the image on the Turin Shroud is a very mysterious thing. Firstly, paradoxically the faint image on the cloth is actually a negative. When it is developed as a negative (the famous image we see) it is clearer. So it is s positive negative.

Next it is not a painting or a rubbing or a scortch. It was done not by camera obscura. Schwortz has said – Even with all our modern technology we cannot come close to replicating it’. They can actually ‘lift’ the properties of it and you get a 3d effect. This is not a mere trick. If it was a painting or a rubbing the properties would degrade not lift.

So that’s the positive for me. Now the negative. Which is really a positive. The carbon dating. It is generally agreed now by most members of STURP (Turin Shroud Research Project) that the snippets taken from the Shroud to carbon date were poorly chosen. Poorly chosen because an order of nuns (the Poor Clares) had repaired the Shroud after it was burnt in a fire. It was a reweave (it took a lay housewife in America to notice this)..

More evidence that it is much older than Medieval-they have examined the flax and because some chemical or other is missing shows that it is between 1, 500 to 3, 000 years old. A time frame that could include the burial of Jesus.

The man in the Shroud looks like Jesus doesn’t he? That’s because the iconography of Jesus goes back a very long way.

It is anatomically correct and consistent with a Jesus’s. crucifixion. Firstly there are rivulets of (real) blood at his hairline indicative of the crown of thorns. His legs aren’t broken because remember there was no need as he had died. There are the wounds in the upper part of his palms which would hold his body. The marks of the wounds on his back are consistent with scourging.

We know from the historical record that when the Shroud first came to light in the Middle Ages the Pope of the time said it was a fake and that it should not be venerated. The Archbishop of Turin at the result if the carbon dating declared it to be a hoax. This present Pope insists on calling it an icon not a relic.

And you have the scientists like Schwortz and others of STURP who have been up close and (literally) personal with are the ones championing it as the burial cloth of Christ. Its a funny old world..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/4210369.stm

https://www.raydowning.com/blog/2016/2/15/the-3d-information-on-the-shroud-of-turin

Nominated by: Miles Plastic