Max Verstappen (2)

What a spiteful whining greedy Cunt he is!

In fact I now think he is worse than the other winging misogynistic cunt Jos his Dad… Cunts the pair of them.

So lets see what is going on a Ree Bull F1 not that anyone really gives a fuck about it or Christian Horner (apart from the washed up singer Geri) but cant anyone see what is happening in the Sexting issue.

So the arrogant Twat Max is on a petty £50 million per year salary and wants more, his contract takes him to 2028 and fuck me no pay rise built in the poor little Cunt.

So Jos and Maxi baby leak a load of bollocks made up WhatsApp’s Texts (Thought they were encrypted by the way) as his employers and a highly rated specialist barrister were not able to find any wrong doing so little bot Max can invokes a break cause in his contract … move to Merc with Toto and get a fucking pay rise.

Absolute genius if if wasn’t so transparent form the pair of wanking little rich arrogant CUNTS!

MSN

Nominated by: Maximus Cuntus

(As of today we are reducing the number of published nominations down from 3 to 2 per day (7am and 1pm). This is only a temporary thing. Thanks – The Admin Team)

Protecting our Borders (6)

 


The link below relates to a lovely little story I happened across the other day.

It loosely connects with an earlier nom about renewing passports/driving licences on-line, using a photo that could, potentially, be 20 years old, in which I hinted that younger relatives could be using an older person’s passport to illegally enter the UK.

Surely not, you might say. Who would do such a thing?

Well, here we have an unidentified male, who has been “waving through” people arriving from India, mainly, so they can fly to Canada ( what, all of them? ) where they claim asylum.
All for a fee, of course.

He was arrested, but presumably granted bail, because he has fled the country, to India! Wonder who waved him through, and whose passport he used?

Protecting our Borders?

The Standard

Nominated by Jeezum Priest.

The “Impartial” US Supreme Court

ATTORNEY FOR DONALD TRUMP: Your Honors, our constitution bars anyone who has engaged in insurrection from holding any office under the United States. On behalf of Mr Trump I ask you to pretend this isn’t so.

JUSTICE 1: I’m not averse to a game of ‘let’s pretend’. Used to play it when I was a child.

JUSTICE 2: What about the television coverage of his speech before the riot at the Capitol? We all saw what happened.

ATTORNEY: Mr Trump is asking you to pretend you didn’t see it. And to remember he personally appointed three of your Honors to your present position.

JUSTICE 3: Ah yes, I see. Interesting.

JUSTICE 4: But some people might accuse us of a lack of impartiality.

ATTORNEY: No-one you need to worry about. What are they going to do, sue you?

JUSTICE 5: Point well taken.

JUSTICE 6: I’m convinced. Who cares what the constitution says anyway?

ATTORNEY: Mr Trump would like you to find in his favor and pretend it’s for the good of the country.

CHIEF JUSTICE: Sounds good to me. We’re all agreed then? And in a few weeks we get to decide whether he’s immune from criminal prosecution. If the constitution says anything about it, we can pretend that it doesn’t.

JUSTICE 7; I like this game.

The Hill News

Nominated by: Allan

Fast Cut Editing In Films

It’s not novel for me to be on here moaning about the limitations of modern-day film making, particularly with regard to the efforts of our American cousins. There’s a lot to dislike; cliché ridden dialogue and scenes, an obsession with superheroes, prequels, sequels and ‘re-imaginings’, and worst all, incessant wokery.

To this list I’ll add the penchant for that incredibly annoying technique referred to as ‘fast cut’ editing, where many shots of short duration are piled one on top of another in rapid succession, presumably in an attempt to inject pace or excitement into the film at a given point.

I was confronted by the perfect example of this infuriating trope when the wife and I sat down a couple of nights ago to watch ‘Jason Bourne’. We came to the inevitable car chase sequence (a cliché in itself these days), with the inevitable attempt by the production team to try to outdo all such previous ‘smash ’em up’ efforts.

So what did we actually get? You guessed it. Hundreds of short little takes rammed jarringly together, throwing the viewer around the action in dizzying fashion. Chuck in the inevitable shaky camera and CGI for good effect, and you’re left with a confusing, disorientating, frustrating mess;

As a further evidence to support my case, I offer the undernoted classic by way of contrast. Look at how the director starts things off slowly, with the protagonists prowling around each other like a couple of sparring Siamese fighting fish. Then, aided by a some superb scoring, he shifts through the gears, gradually building the pace and tension to a superb denouement. No fast edit (and no shaky camera or CGI), just superb film-making technique;

M’luds, the prosecution contends that ‘fast edit’ is shit, and rests its case .

Nominated by: Ron Knee

This is Rigged


We head North of the Border where the jocks are strapping and the women toothless, to a group of leftie loonies called “This Is Rigged” complain about the cost of living, and rising prices, by wasting food, by pouring it on a bust of Queen Victoria, before scrawling an obscenity on the bust:

No doubt the stupid fuckers will be voting for Labour, even though Kweer is really Tory Lite.

We are not amused.

Daily Express

Nominated by W.C.Boggs.