
I’d like to nominate the guardian for a cunting. Not just because they’re the guardian, although that deserves a cunting by itself, but also because they’re moral cowards.
“comment is free”, they boast. Liberal guardians of free speech. Yeah right, my arse. I’ve posted several comments recently, making sure they abide by the site’s rules. I don’t make personal attacks on individual journalists nor on individual commentators, no matter how insufferable the average guardian reader is. And yet I find most of my posts deleted simply because I have the gall to disagree with their bubble of opinion.
I only read the site because I think it’s important to get as rounded a view of current affairs as possible. Yet it seems that to the guardian, if you dare to disagree with their opinion, you’re automatically a nazi and therefore not worthy of being allowed to comment.
Far from being Liberal, the guardian seems intent on operating a rigid ideology that cannot be broken. As such, they stifle free speech and the free exchange of ideas, and are therefore cunts of the highest order.
Nominated by Le Cunt Noir
This guy is a typical charlatan preacher pretending to be a man of god and peace but only in the game for da pussy. He’d hold gangbangs with the phat ass parishioners convincing them a bit of ‘unnatural sex’ (presumably that means backdoor action) was good for their souls. He’s recorded laughing and egging on a fellow brother of fudge pastor offering advice on browntowning the bad mama jamas. (yes I did use urban thesaurus)
Ordinarily I’d be right behind the man working toward founding an ‘International Association for the Advancement of Pussy Eaters’ but using his power as a supposed man of god to further his aim of cuntism is wrong.
I wonder what the SJW reaction to Kings behaviour will be. Bet on silence. But not here fellow cunters…
nominated by MandroidZ