Pointless Government Apologies

Wasting time and resources at the public expense.

An investigation is to be launched into forced adoptions in the 50s 60s and early 70s.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57274323

‘Hundreds of women forced into giving up their babies for adoption have called on the prime minister to issue a government apology.
Many did not go on to have more children and have said the loss caused them to lead a lifetime of grief.
They want the UK to follow Australia, which in 2013 became the first country to apologise for forced adoptions.’

I dont underestimate the trauma this caused. But.
What is the point of this breast beating? It wasnt any present day politicians responsible. What the fuck have they to apologise for?
We get more and more of this token bullshit such as the vigil for the poor woman murdered by an animal in London. But what the fuck is the point?

Nominated by: Cuntstable Cuntbubble

9 Cunts in a Skoda

A bit of a comedy cunting with attached link to a video, if it wasn’t quite serious it would be the plot of a comedy sketch.

North Yorks Police were having a crackdown on uninsured cars and pulled over a Skoda, what they didn’t bank on was the comedy value when the passengers literally spilled out of the car.

The video is hilarious, 9 people in the car, including 2 in the boot….. you can guess they are of a foreign extraction ?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9624773/Video-Police-stop-Skoda-Octavia-carrying-NINE-people.html

Nominated by: Sick of it

Amanda Holden (4)

Amanda Holden needs yet another cunting,

she is a shameless media whore as well as being pretty much the same in life, she has fucked her way to the position she,s in now, with morals of a stray cat shows no sign of slowing it down, the plastic surgery queen is knocking on a bit now, so we can only expect more racey pics in the future.

She will do anything to get her pic in the press but this time i think she has had a bit of an own goal, she has released photo,s of herself wearing money so if you didnt thing she was a money grabbing, gold digging cunt heres the proof.

There will be a similar pic of Megain Shitstain at some point in the future wearing Orangutan boys money as well….

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/15082367/amanda-holden-money-naked-heart-radio/

Nominated by: Fuglyucker 

Pornography (2)

Has anyone noticed how boring and soul destroying modern pornography is?

When I was a young teenager nothing was more exciting than illicitly acquiring a few porn magazines. Whitehouse, Lovebirds, Fiesta, Mayfair and even those crummy little black and white contact magazines were intoxicating and became treasured possessions, to be hidden under the bed or at the bottom of a draw, away from the prying eyes of my mother.

Of course the quality was appalling and many of the models looked like they were doing it for drug money. But it was great, nonetheless. Just occasionally we would come across the real deal, a Danish porn magazine like Colour Climax and I would disappear into my bedroom for hours on end.

That soon came to an end when my mother discovered my new hobby, alerted by my bleary-eyed and tired appearance, and my prized collection disappeared. She did however leave untouched a few copies of Mayfair, perhaps wisely concluding that it was fairly harmless stuff and that I should have some outlet for my sexual frustration or else a pregnant girl might appear on the doorstep.

The problem with modern pornography is that it’s too available. The average 14 year old boy must have seen it all by now. The glamour and excitement has gone. And for the most part the porn is too soulless and explicit to be enjoyable. Every perversion is catered for and once you’ve seen it all, and there’s nothing left to show, all the mystery has gone and there’s no place left for the imagination to roam.

The moral question has always dogged pornography. Is it exploitation? I don’t think the models are exploited and many are paid well. They and the producers are the ones doing the exploiting. I have no doubt that it can mentally harm models that do it for a long time.

Anyway, the whole modern pornographic industry has become a cunt. They’ve robbed our teen boys of the innocence and excitement of the Great Porn Quest, which was a right of passage.

Nominated by: Marvellous Mechanical Cunting Machine

and seconded by: Infidelgastro

I’ll second that. Those well thumbed little books were like treasure. My brother had a few and I once showed them to some older kids in our air raid shelter. They made me leave and I had to wait outside whilst they perused them. They’d arrive in droves every day until my mum cottoned on. Then my brother copped it.

Magazines with a fully clothed woman on the front and removing an item of clothing every page. Suspenders, stockings the lot. It normally became too much before the end as it is now.

Fucking hell I miss those days and those granite erections too.

Sheffield University (3)

Sheffield University and Darwin.

I know I recently cunted Sheffield “University”, but they’ve been at it again and I think it important to draw attention to their antics. Not content with dismissing Newton as a white saviour that deserves cancelling, they have turned their attention to Darwin because he held “racist views” and allegedly used his theory of natural selection to justify white male superiority. This is despite Darwin’s support for the abolition of slavery, which he called a “sacred cause” and said that it “makes one’s blood boil”.

The “university’ has also told staff and students to no longer call our greatest scientists “founding fathers”, “idols” or “geniuses” and to avoid “hero worshipping” scientific figures. Presumably because no white man can be a genius or a hero and references to patriarchy must be avoided. I presume that from now on we can only have “founding mothers”, as long as they are not white.

This “university” goes on to preach that this practice treats them as “white saviours” and erases less privileged scholars. The “whiteness and Eurocentrism of our science” must be dismantled, they declare. Who are these less privileged scholars? Darwin explained evolution and it accepted because the theory matches the observed facts. Privilege has nothing to do with it – Darwin was right and that’s that.

The “university” goes on to say that “science cannot be objective and apolitical…….the curriculum we teach must acknowledge how colonialism has shaped the field of evolutionary biology and how evolutionary biologists think today”. Unscientific garbage. Scientists teach evolution because it’s a scientific observation which has been proven to be correct.

It’s correct that evolution has been occasionally abused to justify racist doctrines. The Nazi’s famously did this. Isn’t the correct approach to say that evolution is correct as a scientific theory but it has been abused by some disreputable scientists with an ideological agenda to push? In other words, treat students as educated adults that can work out the truth for themselves. University is supposed to teach critical thinking after all.

A word of advice to any aspiring scientists. Avoid Sheffield “university “. You are likely to emerge from a course there as scientifically illiterate.

Cunts.

https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.894561!/file/Decolonise_Handbook.pdf

Nominated by: Marvellous Mechanical Cunting Machine

Seconded by..who would have thunk it..Marvellous Mechanical Cunting Machine:

If I might just add something further here.

It’s correct that the situation with Darwin is a bit more nuanced. He did regard whites to be advanced over dark-keys and men over women. But that, I’m afraid, was the accepted attitude of the day. Why draw attention to it? It’s the science that matters. A scientist is simply the conduit for a discovery. It matters not a jot what his personal beliefs are and he stands or falls on the science, nothing more.