Cunt that is the BBC. Why? Because this evening, on BBC National News ( 12/07 ) the BBC have taken it upon themselves to investigate the SAS for their undoubted atrocities in battle.

Since when was the BBC able to commission themselves as ” Police ” and in particular, to broadcast footage that is claimed to be evidential and without bias.

I will not go into chapter and verse, but I strongly object to ( once again ) our forces are attacked by a bunch of London Centric scumbags funded by us the taxpayer. We have been promised the BBC will be axed. It hasn’t. It is way overdue that the institution is burned to the fucking ground and its cunts of staff tarred, feathered and then beheaded in the customary way of REAL criminal scum who they protect, nurture and actively promote.

If Putin is listening, a Nuke on the BBC would be greatly appreciated. And of our forces? If we cannot and will not stand up for them, then we deserve the great shit slide to our ultimate oblivion.

BBC News Link

Nominated by: ferrars hall

Below is an extract of a timed article.

‘Providers of sex education in schools are teaching children that prostitution is a “rewarding job” and failed to advise a 14-year-old girl having sex with a 16-year-old boy

that it was illegal.
Outside organisations teaching children about sex also promote “kinks” such as being locked in a cage, flogged, caned, beaten and slapped in the face, The Times has found.
One organisation encouraged pupils to demonstrate where they like to touch themselves sexually, in a practise criticised as “sex abuse” by campaigners.
Another provider, an LGBT+ youth charity called the Proud Trust, produces resources asking children aged seven to 11 whether they are “planet boy, planet girl, planet non-binary”.

Times News Link

I don’t know if the link will work for everyone, but you should be able to find the article with a quick search.

I don’t think I need to add much, though I would like to say deviants have no place talking to kids about sex and local authorities allowing this are guilty of failing to safeguard children.

Cunts

Nominated by: Sixdog Vomit

The following are insincere phrases that are either spoken, written down or presented on media displays and are all too commonly seen these days. All of them, to quote Peter Griffin from Family Guy, really grind my gears:

CLAIM #1: “We value your privacy”

No you don’t. If my privacy meant as much as you claim, you wouldn’t be trying to steal my personal details or my web browsing history etc. so fuck right off. Plus in the case of web browsing you only ask now anyway because you have been forced to by law – before that you just helped yourselves.

CLAIM #2: “We apologise for the wait/inconvenience”

Nope. If you cared for customer convenience or time spent on a call, you would increase the amount of telephone operators so that we are not forced to wait in an excessively long queue, only to have our call dropped right before we reach a human being. Making the call centre/staff based in the country/region of the caller’s origin helps a lot with awkward-to-understand accents too.

CLAIM #3: “Your call is important to us”

You may think twice about making that spurious claim when I eventually do talk to a human being and complain about how shit you are as a business/service/bank. If my tirade of expletives is being “recorded for training purposes” then all the better!

Those are the main three which I can think of right now, but I am sure there are many that are equally annoying that I have missed on this list. I am looking forward to seeing what you lovely fellow cunters can come up with.

I turned 50 years old two weeks ago and I have noticed that my patience for corporate bullshit and unnecessary bureaucracy is eroding for each year that I get older.

Nominated by: The Wizard’s Sleeve

Your chips just got more expensive!
Quick, those of you with freezer space, rush out immediately to buy frozen chips!
You don’t have to worry about the scarcity of hash browns, for example, because they are apparently not affected by a poor potato harvest, presumably because they are made of onions and recycled egg cartons!

BBC News Link

Anyway, I thought that those amongst us, who have a bunker full of Fray Bentos pies, should be warned that there might be NO CHIPS!!
The horror, the humanity!

Nominated by: Jeezum Priest

One of the very few events left untouched by wokeism was this one. It’s one of the very few events left that I could watch as a form of escapism.

I don’t care if the dark keys win most events. I’m comfortable that there are differences between the races, I just like watching the fastest and strongest competing against each other.

It seems this event has had its day too. At least the coverage has.

The BBC coverage was naff on day 1 (where we’re up to at the time of writing) and it was an all dark key/gay/wimmins panel. The main presenter (a fat dark key ‘innit’ woman) was not the best of presenters. Indeed, I think Joey Deacon uttered more coherent sentences on the BBC than she ever has.

Obvious gay, (he ‘came out’ recently – about as convincing a straight bloke as Liberace) Colin Jackson was there with his gay voice. Jessica Ennis (yes, every which way and thrice on Sundays) was the other diverse panel member.

At least they’re all former athletes I suppose. They know their onions. It was just the presenter who was naff (I think she too was an athlete, albeit not as well known or successful as Ennis and Jackson).

And no honkies? Bit racist, innit?

Therefore, I switched over to the live coverage via the IAAF on YouTube. Two commentators. Both wimmins.

So far, we’ve had great insights such as ‘That was a good jump.’ and ‘A season’s best. He’ll be happy with that.’ One of them has been rattling on about how great the diversity is in the hammer throw just now.

I just love those inane, shrieking voices when I’m watching sport.

Fuck off.

Wiki News Link

Nominated by: Cuntybollocks