Quote from the 1st link story ‘Mr Lester, who is white, allegedly shot Ralph Yarl, 16, who is black’
Then we come to this story: see link number 2.
You will note, no mention of colour of the girl that was shot, but you can see the gunman that shot her was a Black man….but again, no mention of colour at all in the article.
So is this a Black on Black shooting, or a Black on White? But in that story colour isn’t apparently important. However referring back to the first article, because this is a White guy shooting a Black kid, then this is important in the world of the MSM to continually stoke the flames of racism where it doesn’t exist.
Here’s another story reported widely this week: see link number 3
This is about a Black cheerleader who accidently got into the wrong car owned by Pedro Tello Rodriguez (a non White Hispanic) and was promptly shot by him. Again, the article has no mention of colour of either people.
Where are the BLM lot- surely they should be out on the streets like they do when it happens to be Whites who kill Blacks?
Why hasn’t the BBC mentioned the colour of those involved in the second two stories? If you consider it not important or relevant, then WHY do they think the opposite in the first story where a White guy is involved?
This is a super super cunting for the BBC and other MSM who are causing so much damage to race relations now, despite the fact most people if not everyone I know accept people ‘of colour’ and genuinely have no issue with them…..even with new laws everyday telling us what we are allowed to say and do- but for the MSM it’s not enough….racism to the BBC is like a pot of shitty gold to these cunts.
Nominated by Chuff Chugger.