is a cunt.
The modern way of life sees many things held dear being irrevocably destroyed. A previous cunting branched in to the language side of things with cunters listing words they felt had lost any of their traditional meaning. My 2 go-to’s there would be ‘celebrity’ and ‘hilarious’. Bastardized to death by sensationalist click-bait stories about fuck-all.
And you might say ‘that’s fine, use alternate words if you want’ (There are contrarian fucking apologists for everything).
But 2 weeks ago some boats that were part of a ragtag flotilla were intercepted … we all knew they’d be stopped and they were. Taken to land and deported soon after. It has been done before, the IDF not as enamoured by our Greta as headline writers would appear to be. Big yawn.
But if you believe online news, the interception in question caused ‘Global outrage’. I don’t know how they’re defining that, personally.
In da movies, if a planet-killer asteroid is identified as heading for earth, there is global panic. That seems apt in the situation. But besides the cunts that are always going apeshit about the other thing *anyways*, it was business as usual the next day for ‘the world’.
Anyways. They must mean a few individuals in far flung spots to justify ‘global’. One in Greenland, say, .. one in Italy, one in Australia. All 3 outraged by the same something that only matters to them. DOES that count as global outrage, though?
It MUST, because the incident that has me cunting here, is the following :
Not very nice. Bullies are cunts. A *little* bit funny in a gallows humour sort of way. (kids using the word ‘Pussy’ 😄).
But still. ‘Global outrage’? I think not.
So what will we call it going forward if something of significant happenstance in the negative column were to occur?
As a tangent, the likes of the link get awarded the moniker ‘global outrage’, but .. other somewhat more outrageous events seem to not qualify. I don’t recall much global outrage being reported in the tabloids re: Southport et al.
I see in the time it took to nom this, this particular case was edited to ‘outrage worldwide’ in the article which is still hyperbolic hyper-bollocks but lexically a tad more defendable in an argument about it, I suppose .. but the cunting endures ‘cos the next so-called global outrage is surely only days away as I type.
Maybe Trump will misgender some cunt or something.
Nominated by Cuntemall.




