Wot, again? Is there no end to the perfidy of these cunts? Apparently not. Auntie’s had her drawers pulled down again in another ‘cover-up’ scandal.

Cunters will recall the furore over Martin Bashir’s now infamous ‘three in the bed’ interview with Princess Diana. After rumblings about Bazza using nefarious methods to set things up, the Dyson Report concluded in 2021 that faked documents had indeed been used to persuade Doe Eyes to take part in the interview, and that the Beeb had tried to cover this up. The report could not specify who had ordered the cover-up, only concluding that it must have been someone in ‘senior management’.

In an attempt to get to the bottom of matters, investigator Andrew Webb has been pursuing Auntie to release information which could shed some light into this sleazy saga. After having its arm twisted by the courts, thousands of documents were finally released, only for Webb to find that in its arrogance, the Beeb had heavily redacted much of the material on the grounds of ‘irrelevance’. Back to court then, by the look of it.

Do these arseholes never learn? The BBC is a public funded institution, once the pride of the nation, which likes to boast of its transparency and accountability. Yet when push comes to shove, it’s ‘Savile’s Travels’ again; more obfuscation and dissembling. Sooner or later all the shit on this is going to hit the fan. Ducking and diving and back-covering only prolongs matters and ultimately makes the damage worse. When you’re in a hole the first rule is to stop digging. Just ‘fess up and be done with it.

In 2024 a state funded broadcaster is an anachronism. The Tories were supposed to be going to ‘do something’ about Auntie’s funding, but then the Tories were going to ‘do something’ about a lot of things. Looks like we’re stuck with this bloated, soiled, discredited beast for the foreseeable.

The BBC; Big Bunch of Cunts.

Daily Mail

Nominated by: Ron Knee

What planet is the Guardian on?

”Thatcher was right: Tory moderates have no power over the party’s ruthless right-wing extremists”

MSN News

Does anyone know who these all powerful fuckers are? And where their policies are implemented?

And further more:–

” Despite all the lurches to the right by Rishi Sunak’s government, there are still supposed moderates in the cabinet, ”

Lurches to the right? These cunts dispense more benefits than previous governments of any stripe. They put the scum of the earth in hotels and fail to remove the cunts with any sort of due process. They are more akin to wet LibDems that anything ‘far right’.

Ruthless extremists? You are having a giraffe.

The Guardian, fantasy rag for middle class tossers.

Nominated by: Cuntstable Cuntbubble

This cunting here is for parasites who feel hard done by because the government attempted to put limits on how much you can milk the system.

BBC News

I know not everyone on benefits wants to be in that position and I’m all for helping people through hard times. It’s another piece of fair and balanced reporting by the BBC but we don’t expect anything more from those cunts!

Anyway, having read about these poor women who all had multiple children without the means of supporting them I’m very upset.

What kind of country are we if we don’t throw ever more of other peoples money at irresponsible cunts who think they are doing society a favour by pumping out more chav brats?

I’ve got four kids but the fucking nazi government are only taking money off everyone else to pay for two of them.

The welfare state has normalised this sort of entitlement, millions of cunts sucking money away from things this country needs like baby cuckoos.

If you get a dog you can’t afford to look after you’re a cunt, make babies you can’t afford and you’re a victim.

These cunts are still getting lump sums towards their utilities and most of their rent and council tax paid for them.

Up to 26 k a year salary for being a spunk receptacle isn’t enough apparently.

Fuck off with the lot of you. It’s s lifestyle choice now. Being a single mother is difficult but surely you know that after the first child? Why is personal responsibility such an evil concept?

Most of these cunts couldn’t earn 25k a year if they tried. But because of their irresponsible choices they are given a better income than people who are working full time. Isn’t that insanity?

This is socialism and we live in a socialist state. Socialism is hard coded into our way of life now. No one has the balls to openly call these people out.

I’ve not mentioned the fathers involved in these stories. They are also mostly cunts, you made the kids you ought to be paying for them but fuck working when you can fuck skanks, smoke weed and play on the Xbox rather than pay for your jizz stains.

Any given life form can only sustain a certain level of parasite load before it is weakened and eventually dies.

The government isn’t destroying your child’s future, you chose to have a child with no way of providing a future apart from stealing out of other peoples incomes.

Sorry if the rambling rant, I’m sick of hearing one side of a story and I’m sick of no one asking these people difficult questions.

Nominated by: Sixdog Vomit

And Seconded by: Chuff Chugger

I second this nomination as I can to this page to post it…albeit a bit too late.

I would like to raise a point in the article that the two child benefits restriction came in, in 2017. 7 years ago……..

I quote. ‘Danielle lives in Fulham, west London, with her four children, aged 12, five, three and seven months’

So, how many of your sprogs were born when you KNEW this would be the case with benefits love???

Another quote. “The two-child limit on benefits is one of the biggest policy drivers of child poverty,” Barnardo’s chief executive Lynn Perry says.

YES, but only if you keep popping out kids, which is it is exactly designed to stop! YOU are putting your kids in poverty..get it? No, didn’t think so you feckless cunt

This is a real piss boiler.

 
Arguably, the greatest English language poet of all time, Shakespeare has been interpreted and reinterpreted thousands of times as different actors, producers and directors have all sought to put their stamp on his literary masterpieces.

Today there is a disturbing new trend that seeks to replace the genius of the Bard’s work with revisionist Wokeist dogma.

First up we have Macbeth starring Daniel Craig. Truth in advertising; I never liked Craig as 007. I’m glad his run is over. And I don’t care what he does post Bond. But I came across this load of manure and was shocked that even a talentless hack like Craig would involve himself in such revisionist, woke nonsense:

NY post

Did you all notice the lack of 11th century costumes? The modern clothing?

How about the fact that 2 of the Witches were Schvartzes and one was a man?

By the way, this wagon load of manure is from 2022 and still running.

Then of course there’s this bit of wokery; & Juliet

That’s right it’s…& Juliet

In this brilliant adaptation, it turns out that Romeo was a player! Quite the Player. Despite his dalliances with Juliet, he was hooking up with the entire assortment of alphabet soup characters.

After his death, Julie found out about his amorous adventures and rather than off herself, she embarked on a journey of self awareness, went to France and had all kinds of fun with her non-binary comrades.

The great Megyn Kelly and her excellent guest Adam Corolla:

Youtube

Despite the plethora of cuntiness that this nomination invites the IsaC Faithful to comment on, the single most important aspect was brought up by Adam Corolla.

This is about grooming.

And as Megyn’s remarks show, parents must go above and beyond in order to keep their children from being co-opted by the horde of degenerates now operating openly under the guise of artsy-fartsy, woke orthodoxy in our society.

Nominated by General Cuntster.

This could be one of those Project Fear/Conspiracy Theory-type noms, but I’ve been reading a broad spectrum of news sites of all political leanings with regards the recent revelation that the super rich (billionaires and not millionaires), are building vast underground bunkers on the premise of a “Just In Case…” scenario.

Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, Oprah Winfrey, Jeff Bezos .. are just a few names banded about, declaring their love for their new underground homes should the world decide to blow itself apart.

I suppose being prepared for any possible global disaster is a good thing, just so long as you don’t mind living like a hermit for years on end. But exactly why are they doing this, especially most recently? Is there something us mere plebs don’t know? Is this their most extreme idea of The Great Reset and Build Back Better, at the behest of the Globalists?

It also begs the question that if a global conflict is not too far off the horizon, what do national governments intend to do about looking after its citizens?

As I said at the start, conspiracy theories make for interesting stories and debate, even if they turn out to be utter bollocks! But perhaps wearing a tin foil hat and buying/living in an Anderson Shelter for 30 years might just be our best hope should the bomb finally drop!

Business insider

komando

Daily Fail

Nominated by Technocunt.