Sounds noble, eh? A pint of blood every six months, maybe? Organ donation when y’die? …

Ideally, in an ideal world, .. commendable. But this world is far from ideal. It’s overflowing with bad types. From all out just absolutely worthless cunts, to top of the line criminal offenders, with multiple multiple violent and sexual crimes everywhere daily. Not rare any more. Rife.

It was nutter criminal ‘Charles Bronson’ who put this in my mind when he declared HIS organs would be up for transplant but he specified not for cops, bumderers, nor non-caucasian. And the U.K. transplant board used that to grandstand and say ‘no, thanks, … no differentiating here, no sir!

And I there and then thought ‘what about (other) predatory perverts?’

And since that day, my answer would be ‘no’. Am waiting for presumed consent (passed in 2024 without referendum ask, the paddy usual) but not snuck into actuality yet … so I can immediately lodge my no-way, josé (or m’tumbo, or joe fucking bloggs) to the list. I guess the powers that be thinking behind the scheme is increased organs via a cross between mass indifference and lazy apathy across the population.

But what the fuck? Murderers, rapists, wifebeaters, animal neglectors, … nobody that anyone would actively try to keep around if you knew outright about them, so why oh so very why would it be worth risking?

It’s not. The counter arguments, such as they are, can wait for the cunting if,as & when ..

The main one will be, of course, ‘what about the good folk?’. Well I’ll go statistics. I USED to think(probably naively) that the societal decency arm of the Pareto Principal (an 80/20 ratio in various fields) was 20% ‘bad’ 80% ‘good’… but even if that ever was true, its fucking flipped by now, 20% decent, 80 … ‘questionable’.

You *might* save a good ‘un.

Or. You might save someone awful. Keep an unrumbled ‘minors attracted’ at it’s perverted criminal habit for 10, 20 extra years thanks to YOUR replacement-supplied ticker???

Not worth the gamble.

Anyways, fuck it. There’s enough cunts on the planet anyways.

‘Bet if you needed an organ you’d be in line for one, though, hypocrite’, you might be thinking, reader ..

I’d recommend you bet otherwise. Hypocrites are cunts too! 🙂

newstalk

Nominated by Shit Cake Baker.

Having a look around today and I spy my Calor gas hoses are looking past their best. While I’m at it cop a look at my trusty blowlamp. Fuck me that does look grim.

After an online search I saw a local avert for hoses. Ideal only a couple of miles away. Go over and ask. I can sell you two metres of hose. Me that’s no good I want five metres.

Well if you show me your Gas safe card I can sell you as much as you need.

Don’t be silly say I, I’m retired now. Sorry I can’t sell you it. Fine stick it where the sun don’t shine then.

Fucking jobsworth cunts.

Nominated by : CuntyMort

OK…For the record I don’t watch this kind of brainless Saturday evening tv fodder for the hard of thinking but I was at my PC coming up to 1am just finishing another bottle of decent red before logging off (not a euphemism in this scenario) and had one last check on the days news on the BBC website and came across this announcement:

bbcnews

Now, I don’t know what the odds are for the 4 finalists to fill the BBC box ticking categories, but if it were a ‘genuine’ result then they are pretty long odds. However, by complete skill, luck, or deliberate internal manipulation (you decide) we have ended up with the 4 finalists who consist of a Blick male, a butch tattooed lesbian, a female raggy, and a white male. (I cannot suggest one or more of these 4 have a disability either, but cynical me, suggests there’s enough boxes ticked there already)

For me, this is the issue with media, and in particular tv today. I have zero confidence that any results like this nom are genuine because it is simply too coincidental that you would randomly have such a spread of what we have that the BBC (and others) are so desperate to promote to the UK tv viewing public.

I took one look at that pic in my nom and thought… it’s all a fix. Not that I’m worried as I don’t watch it, but I am more worried about this social engineering and brainwashing of gullible cunts who do.

Nominated by Chuff Chugger.

Now back in the day and automatic rifle gave you the edge.

Then frag vests then ballistic vests. Fuck, we used to work on satellite info, pictures of sandpaper.

Not so much now.

Fuck it’s real time now. No longer “we expect ‘ but ‘ just round the corner,’ A very different war….,.

Gone are my days of the gun knife and shovel. Trust me they are the ultimate battle axe, but you don’t want to go there.

So I nominate someone cunt flying an EOD at me on a child’s toy.

Nominated by : Lord benny

Are the police going too far, or are they simply out of control and making it up as they go along?

Honest to Dog you really can’t make this shit up. Poor lass, took her daughters iPads off them, so they could do their homework without distraction. Fair enough.

Vanessa went to visit her mum, an elderly woman.
Next thing, police are at mums door, arresting Vanessa for theft and treating the old mum like she’s a modern day Fagin!

Vanessa is then held in custody for several hours, until the officer who had custody of the shared braincell that day decided there was no case to answer!

Now, reading between the lines, it looks like kids phoned Dad to moan about Mum confiscating their iPads, and Dad, being a total cunt, reported them as stolen. This has not been checked by BBC Verify, BTW.

So far, Surrey Police have failed to either

Apologise to Vanessa, or
Arrest the cunt for making a false report and wasting police time.

Shabby wedding, Surrey Police, very shabby.

lbc.co.uk

Nominated by Jeezum Priest.