Yesterday (09/07/20), they announced they would carry out their threat of terminating free TV licences for the over 75s. One reason being that they are suffering severe financial pressure due to the Dink pandemic (which is bollocks, because this threat was first mooted long before Covid-19 came along).

But it is nice to know they can find the money for the new Eastenders set, that has gone way over-budget, to a princely sum of almost £100m

It is also reassuring that some of their “star” presenters (including Linekunt) recently received generous pay rises, with the BBC explaining “you have to pay the best if you want to keep the best!”

Moreover, the BBC will no doubt spend a small fortune sending hundreds of cunts over to Tokyo for the Olympics next year. I doubt any of these cunts will be slumming it in B&Bs or 2 star flea-pit hotels either. “If you want the best you have to provide the best!”

Most companies that are suffering “severe financial pressures”, have had to make drastic job cuts, or have closed completely. Not the BBC of course. I have yet to read any major job cuts from them (for example with Match of the Day, is there really any need to have 3 or 4 pundits lined up spouting the bleedin’ obvious, while they all “earn” anything up to £500k per year?)

And now they’re going to penalise the over 75s. These people have probably paid the Licence Tax for perhaps 40 or 50 years. But what is their reward? “Fuck you, we don’t care. Give us your money or face prison!”

Is there no end to their fucking bullshit!

Come on Boris, grow some balls, and fuck these arrogant cunts over once and for all. I want the fuckers to sink in their own shit, the cunts!

Nominated by: Technocunt

 

15th anniversary of the London Bomb Outrage.

On 7th July 2005 52 innocent people were killed by ISIS terrorists in central London. Back then there was broad media coverage of the atrocities as well as highlighting who the terrorists were and where they came from.

Fast forward 15 years, and the BBC mentions it rather begrudgingly on their news-site. However, its doesn’t appear on their home page alongside other important news items such as the government handing out £2bn to some households to improve loft insulation, or news about some Hollywood cunt allegedly beating up his ex-wife, or more BLM shite.

No. Instead, you’ll find in buried in the “London” page. And when you do find it, its not even the main news item. Instead its sidelined by some shite about the Grenfell fire being racially motivated!

When you read the bombings article itself, there’s lots of praise from Suckdick towards the emergency services and the community, but absolutely fuck all about who did the crime!

It’s as if the BBC is suffering from selective amnesia, conveniently forgetting it was fucking ISIS that did the crime purely because a) there was plenty of evidence, and b) ISIS bragged about it 9/11 style over the web!

And yet the BBC chose not to mention any of that because it might be seeing as offensive and racist.

#52livesdontmatter!

Nominated by: Technocunt

Hold the front page please as we give a special ultra polite Islington drawing room cunting for this sanctimonious 52 year old BBC correspondent, Mr Bryant a recent father was holding forth on the last third on Wireless 4’s “From Our Own Correspondent” this morning. (1130-1200) The recording starts at 18′ 13”:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000kftf

Mr B was obviously trying to outdo Fergal Keene – his meek and mild, but firm outrage at BLM and the typical anti Donald rhetoric went even further than usual and it sounded like a very polite anti-American rant, such as Radio Albania might have done on Radio Albania in the 60s. Venom-lite you might say Friends wanted him to call his daughter “Hope” by the way, but the Reverend Bryant decided on “Honour” – or should that be “Honor”?

At one point he even laments the fact that little Honour will be able to hold an American passport, such is his disgust with his host country. I suggest if it hurts him that much he either stops taking our money via the BBC or gets a transfer to North Korea. What a motherfucker this creep is.

I suspect he was just boasting he could still get it up and father a kid at 52, and isn’t a typical BBC pansy.

Nominated by: W. C. Boggs 

 

Yet another cunting for the BBC

“In the monologue An Ordinary Woman Gwen tells how she’s struggling to get to get to grips with her incestuous feelings towards her 15-year-old boy Michael.

At one point in the dark monologue, now available to view on BBC iPlayer, she tells how her son suspects her of having an affair, not realising that her new hairdo, lipstick and slimmer figure are meant to get his attention.“

Alan Bennett is a total cunt.
Lancashire is a cunt for taking the role.

The BBC is a cunt for being true to form. No wonder Jimmy Savile was so at home at the BBC. Pushing the barriers again, how long until mincing is shown as a loving normality in our screens. Not only has she got the hots for her own son, he’s only 15.

Drip drip drip tonight on the BBC. Keep it in the family, followed by, Peter and Chelsea, an old mans love for a school girl. Puts a new spin on Children in need.

Cunts, deviant filthy satanic cunts.

Nominated by: Sixdog Vomit

The BBC has dozens of correspondents who presumably “analyze” situations and enlighten us with their insight. Many organizations and industries, particularly the financial industry, use analysts and one of their main jobs is to foresee what might happen in the future based on factual and statistical information. Get it wrong too often and they are out of a job.

However, the BBC´s idea of an analysis is to quote an unnamed “source” or just do a Google search and a quick copy and paste job. One in particular pisses me off – Frank Gardner who is the “Security Correspondent” and pops up every time there is a terrorist incident. In the latest “dispatch”, presumably written from his dining room table as I imagine he is “working” from home, Frank gives us his “analysis” of the killing of the Al-Qaeda leader in North Africa which occurred in Mali at the hands of French forces.

His analysis amounts to four paragraphs which contain nothing original. No quotes from French security officials or Al-Quaeda contacts which any real journalist should have. Instead he refers to an ancient UN security report. This is followed by four paragraphs on the French presence in Mali taken from the archives.

Presumably Frank earns a huge salary in keeping with his expertise and no doubt will retire on a generous pension. Of course, taxpayers will not begrudge him his due. After all, it must be hard work pounding away at a computer and trying to analyze what it happening in Mali one day, Iraq the next and Yemen the day after.

Nominated by Mr Polly