Based on a 1957 book, and made into a very good film in the early 60’s with the great, suave George Sanders in the leading role, it’s now being remade, updated for a modern audience. How original eh?

In this version, the lead character is a woman, who’d have thought it? Her daughter has mental health and substance abuse issues, half of the weird children are effnick. Just what you’d see in a quaint English village, I think there’s still a few of those left.
Keeley Hawes, who plays the new lead, says ‘it’s apt that the part is written for a woman, as it’s a story about women and their bodies, but it’s telling that in 1957 the person at the centre of this female story was a man’

Not really darling, as in the original story, the man’s wife got mysteriously pregnant, so maybe he had a right to be the lead character and to wipe out those creepy little kids at the end. In this version, they’ll probably get therapy and diversity training.

Sky TV

Nominated by: mystic maven

Imagine, if you will, that Britain never conquered most of the world some 2-300 years ago. Imagine if Africa, India, Australia, Canada, the Caribbean and most other countries currently (and formerly) under the banner of the British Commonwealth, had not been invaded for good intentions (trade) or bad (slavery)

Focus in particular on the Caribbean and parts of Africa (South Africa, Uganda, Kenya, Nigeria and Ghana etc.). Had the UK not invaded these countries, would the UK itself not have been quite so racist as it appears to be today by the woke and the usual race baiters?

The likes of David Lammy, Abbott, Butler, Lenny Henry, Gina Miller et al, may not have been around had their parents and grandparents stayed in their indigenous countries.

In such a scenario it would be extremely unlikely none of them would be in the positions as they are today, thanks chiefly to the enterprising and forward thinking UK, despite all its faults.

The problem is, you ask this question to any libtard or baiter and they will just ignore you, resorting to their default reply to any difficult question that has any resonance of a truthful answer. “You’re a racist!”

Had the UK not resorted to empire building, where would they be now?

Nominated by: Technocunt

Cyclists are cunts, this is what happens when you give these fuckers to much leeway, like with the fruits, you tolerate it, eventually accept it, then they have a law change and the cunts take that as an opportunity to take a monumental backward step and start acting like total cunts all the time.

So now its not good enough that cyclists can ride all over the road without a care in the world about the danger they are putting themselves in, now they are trying to ram their choices down our [ as motorists] throats, they are now moaning about things like bin lorries parked in cycle lanes, imagine if the bins didn’t get collected because of these whinging fucks.

They say less cars should be on the road to create more space for these cunts to cycle on.

I for one are now more determined than ever to keep my aging 5 litre v8 Merc going for as long as is humanly possible, the more these cunts make cunts of themselves the more driving im going to do………fuck em

News Link

Nominated by: Fuglyucker

A cunting for the Guardian and yet more fucking racism.

Apparently there is a report by an unnamed Historian that shows government legislation was designed to reduce the number of black people in the UK.

Yes and they have linked it to Windrush (sick of hearing about fucking Windrush), this was all blown out of proportion because when the home office had a push to deport illegals many of the Windrush generation were classified as illegal because they didn’t have the required proof that they were legal.

The home office drive wasn’t aimed at Windrush, it was any cunt who was illegal, but you can be sure that all the Blicks will always be the victims.

The government have refused to make the report public and the usual suspects (Abbott) are shouting racist, well nothing new there.

The bullshit never ends.

Guardian News Link

Nominated by: Sick of it

Our next King really is an out-of-touch moron. I expect if you are surrounded by security guards,you probably can afford to be a bleeding-heart Gobshite….you and your parasitical family won’t ever get to experience the joys of multiculturalism which so many of these illegal immigrants bring with them…perhaps he can invite a few hundred of them to move into his Palaces with him.

Really, the thought of this silly, dim man having any influence on Govt. policy now or in the future is ridiculous….what on Earth can he know about “normal” life?…and what the fuck gives some unremarkable arsehole like him the right to try and influence an ELECTED Govt?….Off with his head…and make sure to get the rest of the rat’s nest too.

Daily Mail News Link

Nominated by: Dick Foxchaser-Fiddler

(Gawd blimey, Dick! A man of your status not a royalist! Heavens to Bettsy – Admin)

And another, this time from Geordie Twatt

PRINCE CHARLES

France24 News Link

He just doesn’t get it, does he? The deal is, you thick cunt, in return for the obscene wealth and privilege you keep your opinions to yourself. Like Mummy does. It’s that simple. Stick to opening Parliament and launching ships and leave it at that.

But no, he’s too full of his own self importance. ‘Private conversations’ my arse, this him meddling in politics yet again. I’ll tell you what, Jugears, you fuck off to Rwanda with your gruesome bird and we’ll put the Channel invaders up in Highgrove House. Then when Mummy croaks we can house the rest of them in Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, Sandringham and Balmoral. They must have hundreds if not thousands of empty rooms between them. Sorted.

Sorry mate, you’re just an ornament, a constitutional bauble. Suck it up and shut the fuck up, you tree-hugging wanker.

And here’s one from Cuntybollocks

Prince Charles

Camilla’s tampon has been flapping his gums again, this time over the ‘appalling’ scheme to send dinghy chancers to Rwanda.

If he’s so concerned, as the UK’s biggest landowner with countless properties on his portfolio, surely there is a simple solution to this ‘appalling’ state of affairs?

That’s right. Old big ears can house them all himself!

Oh, what’s that? Not on my land or in my properties. It’s for the ‘little people’ to pay for and then put up with the scrounging, moaning, chippy, entitled, backwards, rapey criminal cunts, isn’t it?

Sit on your throne, wave at the ‘plebs’ once a month or so and try not to have too many expensive marriages at our expense for no reason, eh old chap?

And keep your hypocritical trap shut on matters you know nothing about.

One needs to get to fuck. And get a fucking proper job, you scrounging cunt.

BBC News Link