(This nom started-out as a post in the kaba-scumbag trial thread).
I hate the thought of ever being called to jury duty… for several reasons, but in the kaba case, specifically, as in many before (ian Cuntley, particularly) … due to the sheer amount of earlier cuntitude by an individual that is kept hidden from a jury being beyond the pale.
Their opinion of a scumbag should not be tainted by ‘unrelated actions’ is the party line….but .. come on! It’s call a spade a spade time, .. I’ve had plenty of friends throughout the different stages of my life.. and not ONE of them, … not one … has ever been in jail or court for anything.
The day huntley was found guilty, it emerged the filthy cunt had been inappropriate with underagers in double-figures previous to the murders of the two girls that he was on trial for. Not a *single* instance, no, ..which COULD be a false accuser, or two cases, but ten complaints logged with cops and five more with social services .. all for ‘relationships’ with minors.
So ; I knew dozens of folk, not one accusation between them … but this one individual cunt has 15+… whether previously prosecuted or not, .. where is the line, ‘justice’ system? There is no (15) smokes without fire.
There was correlation between that kind of behaviour, and the day the previously unpunished cunt lured two 10 y.o.’s into his house …
Imagine being on a jury that finds a cunt like that not guilty ‘playing it safe’, in a facts-lite prosecution, only to find out after the case that it’s a serial predator or gang cunt(i.e. kaba, floyd etc.)with a SERIOUS history of similar behaviour?
‘Prejudicial’ indeed. Hiding prior bad acts is prejudicial too. The wrong fucking way around though. As always. Scumbags have more rights than the people they prey on.
insider croydon
I have other things against being pressganged to jury duty … but shall keep some powder dry ’til when/if this nom goes live
Nominated by CuntemAll.