The “moderators” of MSM online comments are cunts, especially the Daily Mail and Express. Most of the comments contribute fuck-all or are factually wrong and get waved thru. If you go to the trouble of adding a reply/correction –
short intermission whilst I cunt that fat opera singer cunt for Go Compare who’s just appeared on the shit-box
– end of intermission –
and go to the trouble of including some links to show the facts you invariably get a “thanks for your comment – it is under review” and you never see the comment again. The Mail and Express did this to me earlier so I posted DM/DE ISAC and they appeared straight away – obviously the cunts have no sense of irony.
Nominated by: Mary Hinge-Frottom
Try including more than two YouTube links on here… 😉
0
Just make 2 individual posts with the links rather then 3 in 1. Just read this morning charles bronson inadvertinally made you commit suicide by driving him insane with guilt. http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/466375/Charles-Bronson-Fred-West-dead-insane-suicide
0
It’s a shame Bronson got the suicide vibes I’ve been sending out = they were aimed at Spivey.
0
That’s not moderation, that’s a spam filter. Spam regularly contains more than two links so it’s one of the criteria that is used by the filter.
You can post a comment with two links, then another with two links, and so on – so it’s not moderated because you know this. I’ve posted this explanation before…
However I do ban people like our friend with the disabled toilet who can’t post at all. That’s not moderation – we just don’t allow known trolls to post. “Our blog, our rules”
(and I know you’re just having a larf Fred, but I needed to restate the policy)
0
Try commenting on BBC news, unless your comment adheres to their ultra pc code it will never get through. And we have to pay money to the sods, which I think is extortion, I choose to pay sky don’t mind paying it. Forced to pay BBC hate it, we don’t even have a say in how the money is squandered, and why is Alan Yentob still in a job. Sorry I’m rambling the BBC really get my goat.
0
BBC are asking for opinions on the future of their “service”. ….. email only of course. …. *delete*
0
Exactly, if it’s not pro-establishment, it won’t get printed.
0
Moderators? What can they do . The tech savvy will always find a work around. The are all full weight fuc███████████████████████kers, that and they most certainly show a predilection for pae███████████ especially those with gingham███████████████████. As for Yentob. Did you hear about █████████████ and the donkey? Well. apparently he██████████████ and a nun████████████████████████with a cucumber up the ██████████████████ and sideways at that. I kid you not, ask David, oh that’s right he was busy with the pig.
Nothing to worry about with moderators.
0