Care4calais (3)

 
Care4calais is a herd of traitorous cunts.

Hasn’t been cunted for three years, so well overdue a recunting.

It’s been under investigation for three years by the Charities Commission, jointly cuntable, too. I can as yet find no conclusions from the investigation, but more on that anon.

C4C sent some of its wimps and wokes to welcome the first tranche of fighting-age economic migrants aboard the Bibby Stockholm at Portland, today. With flowers, shampoo and a map of the area to better facilitate the migrants’ dispersal into the black economy. Let us hope that the shampoo is insecticidal.

Daily Fail

It appears that the same bunch of UK-hating shitstirrers are opposed to the barge. Though not to its actual location off a small town far from their leafy suburbs. That might put them on the same side as the far-right waycist locals who are for some reason scared that this is going to get completely out of hand.

Cunters will not wish to know what proportion of illegal immigrants, who have no right to be here at all, are going to be housed in a few accommodation barges, and half the hotels in the country. In conditions rather more humane than many a UK -born renter or applicant for social housing is likely to see these days. Indeed, with easy access to doctors and dentists, in relatively luxurious conditions…

And C4C claim charitable status as they pursue their insidious objective. Here, there may be a slight problem. I crave CA’s indulgence for a second link:

civil society

The Charity Commission, which is funded by the (legally resident) taxpayer has been sitting on the issue since first advised of C4C’s governance problem in 2020. While the accounts are visible on the Charity Commission website, the source of most of their funding is completely invisible. Begging the question of whether a little palm grease is not coming from Albania or India. It’s certainly not coming from me.

And this question is front and centre: should registered charities be allowed to run political campaigns?

Take home statement:
“A Commission spokesperson told Civil Society News that charities can take part in political activity that supports their purpose and is in their best interests.

“There are many examples where carrying out political activity is the best way for trustees to support their charity’s purpose. However, political activity must not become the reason for the charity’s existence,” they said.”

Slippery, that. If you hand out a few cheap freebies to illegal immigrants that nullifies your nakedly political intention to flood the country with illegals?

Cunts who need a course in citizenship, administered by waterboard and oven.

Nominated by Komodo

EV Ownership


EV ownership is a cunt.

Are they really more eco friendly? What Car doesn’t seem to think so.

https://www.whatcar.com/news/how-green-are-electric-cars-really/n24646

1. The production produces more carbon emissions than a petrol vehicle according to VW by about 25%
2. It’s more difficult to recycle. Only 10% of the rare minerals used are recovered.
3. We just push the carbon footprint uphill to the power station which we will need another dozen of to hit the demand
4. On short runs the breakeven by going electric is about 77,000 miles. It’s better on long run usage assuming you can find a charging point
5. Most of the lithium used in batteries comes from the Congo where they use child Labour to dig it out.
6. Insurance premiums are higher. Damage the battery and the car is a write off
7. They cost shed loads more to buy
8. The extra weight means that some older multi story car parks will either have to strengthened or ban them
9. Potholes will get worse and roads will wear out faster, again due to extra weight
10. Cars don’t just emit CO2. The rest of the particulate shite they emit doesn’t go away when you drive an EV – just move it upline

I could go on but as far as I can see you have to be a virtue signaling eco loon muppet with more money than sense to buy an EV…

Nominated by : Rt. Hon. Dioclese

The BBC [91]


I read this piss boiling piece in the daily fail. FFS is there NO avenue of bellendery this fucking corporation will not explore? Travelling all the way to the Canary Islands to lecture the public that WE are responsible for global warming and the rise in temperatures this year?

Surely the Spanish have local TV companies who can send them footage rather than send the lecturing apparatchick to piss the British people off?
Rishi, here’s a chance to possibly win a few votes. Defund the fucking BBC. NOW.

Daily Fail Link.

Nominated by : CuntyMort

Gemma O’Doherty and the Irish Light ‘newspaper affair

 
is a cunt.

Pretty simple really – these heartless morons had the audacity to use a photo of a woman’s deceased son, without her permission, in an article about Covid vaccine deaths (the son actually died from suicide and didn’t have the vaccine). The woman is now suing the paper. As a result, the paper and its supporters have launched a vicious campaign of abuse and harassment against her and her lawyer. Needless to say, I hope this poisonous, toxic ‘paper’ gets sued out of existence and the evil hag who runs it tarred, feathered and dragged through the streets of Dublin by an angry horse.

Regarding the link, I was initially going to link to the BBC story which was published today. However, for whatever reason it had been deleted when I tried to find it again for the nom. So I’ve used the next most recent one instead.
For what it’s worth I found this from a while back whilst researching the organisation as well. What a truly vindictive, repugnant bunch of wankers.

Irish times

Irish post

Bbc news

Nominated by opinionated cunt.

Double Standards in Recent Scandals

 

The DG of the BBC Tim Davies and yes what an apt name. Tim dim but nice. He’s got a very weak jaw and just looks soft.

Anyway he has come out that the investigation into Huw Edwards will take ‘months’ if not longer.
The one thing about this scandal is how long we had to wait throughout. We had to wait ages before we learned who he was. Now we have to wait for these other revelations come out.

Poor old Phillip Schofield was outed straight away wasn’t he? It’s taken a lot longer for Huw.
Is it something to do with Phillip in the private sector and Huw in the public?
Everyone is saying the BBC are ‘closing ranks’. Jon Sopel, Emily Maitless have condemned the coverage.

Bloody hell Phillip’s colleagues all seem to turn on him in an instant. Eamonn Holmes embarked on a character assassination of his old colleague with unseemly alacrity
Poor Phil left with not a friend in the world.

Huw has got political support as well. I was listening to Alistair Campbell. Thoroughly supportive.
Finally I think the Sun newspaper itself is going cold on the story as well.
There is something odd going on.

It feels that he is being ‘protected’.
Not a good look for the BBC who have previous on this type of thing.

itv news

Nominated by Miles plastic.