(Seems that Olaf did a Biden, and fell over while jogging, although how he bruised his eye isn’t made clear, ha! – Day Admin)

This slap head kraut creep is the German Chancellor, leader of the most powerful country in the EU.

The EU appeaser in chief, his principal platform is not to displease the Rooskies at any cost. Even his fellow Germans are getting agitated at his lack of backbone and regular capitulation to Putin.

His game plan is to keep the supplies of cheap Rooskie oil and gas flowing into Germany for the benefit of German industry and the economy and bugger Ukraine in its present difficulties.

Where does Putin get a major part of the funding for his war against Ukraine? By selling oil and gas. You see the difficulty.

Have kept my eye on Scholtz as he has ascended the greasy pole of European power over the years not least because he looks in my eyes like the poster boy for a particular brand of German paedo/pervert tourist that is well known to police across the world.

You get them on the Costas, the Algarve, Thailand and other camping sites, anywhere where young children may be found. They end up getting named and shamed as the Official Suspect and their names protected by law as in the case of Madeleine McCann. Due to legal reasons we can only refer to that gentleman as Christian B. For the avoidance of doubt I make no sexual allegations against Schultz other than to me he looks like a wrong’un.

So our shifty little European Ally and fellow member of NATO finds himself in a spot of hot water domestically with questions asked about why he is not authorising military aid as promised to Ukraine.

Worth reminding Cunters about Scholtz’s last promise which he backpaddled on in the same breath, namely the promise of Panzer Tanks which would be built by our old kraut friends Rheinmetal in Ukraine. How would that work? Precisely.

How does Scholtz play the press on that one? He grasses up his allies of course and reveals that French and specifically Blighty special forces have been playing their traditional role of target location and vectoring against the Rooskies. SAS? You did not read it here.

As expected when the Rooskies were being blown to shite by UK Storm Shadow missiles and other ordnance some little men from Hereford with broken noses and very short hair were in there holding hands. Scholtz confirms this to the press FFS!

Double FFS, I would caution Scholtz to steer well clear of certain pubs in Hereford. Fair play Krauts, its traditional that it’s the Yanks who grass up their British allies (Desert Storm etc ect.)

This from The Independent:-

“This is a flagrant abuse of intelligence deliberately designed to distract from Germany’s reluctance to arm Ukraine with its own long-range missile system,” said Tobias Ellwood, the former chairman of the Commons defence committee.

The Independent

BBC News

Nominated by: Sir Limply Stoke

I am convinced my fellow cunters will enjoy getting their teeth into this nom.

My local online rag comments section usually brings out the simpering, cat loving, weedy sort who aspire to be on a parish council as some sort of social status. However on this occasion I find myself agreeing with them.

This is a story (I really wish it was a work of fiction, but sadly not) about a school in my area who’s headmaster has decided to allow (well…I’m not going to say, as it is so piss boiling I will let cunters read the link) Anyhow…….unsurprisingly the comments section has gone ballistic, and with good reason. Cunters….this is what happens when woke kids grow up and become woke headmasters.

Ladies and gentlemen….we are going backwards with any evolution we may have had. We know that, otherwise why do we need security guards in fast food restaurants?

Why are smart clothes going out of fashion and the likes of sports direct clothing people for ‘Sunday best’?

Why are the police and hospitals just now another branch of social services to provide counselling at the expense of preventing crimes and healing genuinely ill patients?

Why are those that correct peoples spelling and grammar chastised online for being pedants, rather than being respected for trying to keep hold of higher standards? (You missed out a question mark, ffs!!! – Day Admin)

Why is there no shame anymore in the way people look, talk and express themselves?

Criticism is met with new laws to prevent alternative opinions being aired.

This is the society we are being allowed to happen….and we are fucked.

KentOnLine

Nominated by: Chuff Chugger

And while we’re on the subject of mental health – genuine or otherwise, here’s this rather brief nom from Sam Beau

Young People

I would have thought that this would already have been cunted, but if not, …

BBC News

Sorry, I have no more words – however, if you let this short nom through, Admin, I`m sure its brevity will be swamped by voracious responses (if I`m reading the audience right).

Apparently, “white gaze” (yet another pernicious import from America) is the assumption that the default reader or observer is coming from a perspective of someone who identifies as white, or that people of colour sometimes feel need to take into account the white reader or observer’s reaction.

Various authors of colour describe it as a voice in their heads that reminds them that their writing, characters, and plot choices are going to be judged by white readers, and that the reader or viewer, by default, is white.

Err… if you say so…. In other words, black racism.

Or, in the context of this nomination, the banning of white people from attending a theatre in the West End of London on certain nights. Apartheid anyone?

Daily Mail

From the article:

Playwright Jeremy O Harris told BBC Sounds yesterday he was ‘so excited’ to put on nights in the West End where tickets were only sold to people who identified as black.

‘One of the things we have to remember is that people have to be radically invited into a space to know that they belong there and in most places in the west, poor people and black people have been told that they do not belong inside the theatre. For me, as someone who wants and yearns for black and brown people to be in the theatre, who comes from a working class environment, who wants people who do not make six figures to feel like theatre is a place for them, it is a necessity to radically invite them in with initiatives that say “you’re invited”. Specifically you.”’

Asked if it didn’t make him uncomfortable that in turn it was telling white people they weren’t allowed in the space, he responded: ‘There are a litany of places in our country that are generally only inhabited by white people, and nobody is questioning that, and nobody is saying that by inviting black audiences here you are uninvited.’

(Bollocks. There are no places in the UK where black people are banned. More’s the pity some would say.)

One senior Tory MP, who did not want to be named, raised questions over the decision to bar white people from the show, telling MailOnline: ‘I understand the subject matter of the show may have particular resonance for some but I would simply question the legality of this? In other circles it would be illegal and racial discrimination. I don’t understand why this isn’t.’

Precisely.

Nominated by: Shit Cake Baker

And on a similar note, there’s this from Balsamic Dave

I don’t know if this one has already been nom’d, but the producers of race-baiting theatre production “Slave Play” have declared their intention to hold two performances for black-only audiences so that those assembled can enjoy the production “free from the white gaze”.

Now let’s indulge a brief thought experiment. Let’s reverse the scenario and have a play devoted to the theme of being white; shall we call it “Hard Working Play”. Let’s have two evenings where we have white-only audiences, this initiative devised to allow an all white audience to enjoy the spectacle “free from the black gaze”. That’d go down just fine, wouldn’t it everyone?

This preposterous “blacks only” restriction also demands the question who does and does not qualify as “black”? Will one half of a mixed race couple have to stay at home? Will someone born of one white and one black parent only be allowed to stay until half time? Can Gary Lineker tag along? Would Michael Jackson be shown the door?

I’d say this lot more than deserve to take a bow for being the bunch of cunts they so clearly are.

ITV News

It is Sunday afternoon. A portly old fucker, in late middle age can be seen ripping off Kim Leadbetter’s jockstrap after this weeks walking football match for old fogies and with much huffing, puffing and farting he dashe off to the meeja and gives one of his outraged diatribes about one of his favourite topics.Not tranny rights (or lefts) this time, no this is MUCH more serious. VERY serious indeed. It’s Dame Kweer and he is talking about Islamophobia:

Keir Starmer accuses ‘weak’ Rishi Sunak of harbouring ‘extremists’ in his party

Keir Starmer accuses ‘weak’ Rishi Sunak of harbouring ‘extremists’ in hi…
The Labour leader spoke out after the Tory party suspended Lee Anderson over comments he made about the mayor of…

You have to grant it to the old wankstain – he has chutzpah!. Extremists in the Conservative Party (well, one anyway. allegedl) , when he has any number of antiSemites, Islam worshipping lesbos and fags, whom he seems to be deaf and dumb to, due his innate cowardice.

Kweer Starmer was jumping on the “Islamaphobia” bandwagon yesterday, but he might overplay his hand. He clearly doesn’t realise that it is traditional Labour voters who have to put up with the Islamification of places like East London and though they might be too scared to say so, agree with Lee Anderson, and if Labour bring in their “anti Islam” laws they might well lose a large number of voters. I still don’t think he will get the landslide he is expecting, which is just as well. I think people see him for the mouth and trousers fake he is.

Of course, things might change, and if, by next week, the public have the balls to realise what Mr Anderson was saying is demonstrably true, Auntie Kweer might well change his mind again. I won’t gold my breath though. Islam is Labour’s latest “victim”

Sky news

Nominated by W C Boggs.

Bonds are an Australian underwear giant which include brands like Jockey and Champion in their mix. Yeah, never heard of Bonds until the other day. Having looked at their website, some of their underwear is horrible and wearing it would make me feel like Nora Batty.

Why is this company of interest you ask? Well, apart from being another company in a long line of companies banging on about sustainability and inclusivity, Bonds’ inclusivity schtick includes a ‘gender free’ underwear section on their website which showcases males and females wearing the same garments.

This does not offend me, in fact the models sporting their gender free garments verge on the amusing. I don’t think I’m supposed to laugh though. Bonds only came to my attention because of their latest underwear for Pride campaign which caused a backlash which was reported in the media, so I thought I’d do some reading about them. (Below is a link from The Metro, who couldn’t understand why there was a backlash.)

MSN News

Here’s the thing, at last. Bonds support a transgender charity for children called ‘minus 18′. Yes a multi-million dollar business just have to support this particular thing, thereby completing their woke marketing trifecta of sustainability, inclusivity and trans. Helping the homeless or giving to cancer is so yesterday.

If you want to bag yourself some ugly underwear and think this charity is brilliant, fear not, you can make a donation to the charity on Bonds’ check out, how convenient!

Minus 18

Nominated by: Cuntologist