Here is a piece of blue ribbon hypocrisy that makes Starmer look like a saint. The 21 year old supplier of filth to the disgraced newsreader, identified only as “Williams” is outraged about the lenient sentence and hwo he feels “sick” and all the faux sympathy for the victims, in a typical low rent Daily Mirror interview, his little face turned away from the camera – as well it might be.
It is really similar to the debate about prostitution, some would say the girls shouldn’t do it, others say that if there were not dirty old men ready to buy the working girls services, the service wouldn’t exist.
Is Williams quite the paragon he makes out?. He claims he met Edwardes (his mum had prevented an earlier meeting) and that he agrees while she was right, he is estranged from her, and might go and live abroad (fuck off now, you little schmuk).
Let’s be clear about this: when he was providing this “service” in his late teens he knew the difference between right and wrong. It wasn’t a one off, it appears to have been an arrangement in perpetuity and until found out and exposed. For this “homeless” lad to pretend victimhood is pure sophistry. He provided a very dubious service which he knew was illegal. In my view he is equally as guilty, and – far from wishing Edwardes was in prison, I feel he deserves the same fate. He was a willing accomplice. He is just a self-pitying little gold-digger,nothing more, nothing less:
Nominated by W C Boggs.