Silence Is Violence

Apparently


A quick nomination for the latest slogan of the woke left and BLM activists.

‘Silence is violence’.
I thought it just signalled indifference but apparently simply not speaking up against racism 24 hours a day equals a violent action.
To be a good person you must mKe sure others see your condemnations and hand-wringing online via social media and vlogs, otherwise you are a racist, a bigot, a white supremacist, and probably a misogynist and transphobe as well.
You may also harbour a secret desire to keep black slaves, or have ancestors who owned them.
In the religion of woke, whiteness, the Y chromosome and straightness are Original Sin.

A year or two ago the same febrile gimps said words were violence,, so not only wont they hear a contrary opinion, but now they wont tolerate you remaining quiet, even after also telling people to ‘stay in their lane’ and that they cant have a valid opinion if they’re straight, white men. They dont have ‘lived experience as a terminally oppressed W. O. C.

The best solution i can come up with is stamping your feet, shrieking and screaming while using actual violence against your opponents, especially if they succumb to your demands, shower you with free money from the taxpayer, including arts council grants for making films about stabbing your little brother, and take a knee.
Taking the knee means, as Larry Fox said on radio the other day, there’s now a master/servant relationship.

They are rolling over. They are offering you a paw. They’re soft and can now be attacked.

Whatever happens, don’t let anyone frame your actual violence as such. It is an ‘expression of righteous anger at injustice…. racist!’

Then proceed to batter the person who dared disagree with you, then decided tthey were subservient, to a wet pulp while claiming moral superiority.

Nominated by Cuntamus Prime

Mayor Marvin Rees

I wont mention the fact i havent tried to have said statue removed before now


I want to nominate Marvin Rees, mayor of Bristol, who whilst being interviewed (ie fawned over) by the obnoxious Kay Cuntley of Sky News, said that people shouldn’t display selective outrage and condemnation. Yet he, just like the BLM movement are totally selective in their outrage over deaths of black people and only ever protest when a black man is killed by some thuggish white cop. But there is no sound from them when black men and boys are being murdered by the 100s every year by other blacks. He perfectly demonstrated the hypocrisy and double standards of BLM, but naturally, Cuntley did not challenge him, I’ve yet to see any so called journalist do that.

Nominated by Mystic Maven

Owen Jones (18)

God im a massive cunt, arent i?


The BBC’S favourite communist chutney ferret watched, as we all did, as a riotous mob (no, not peaceful protesters, BBC) tore down or defaced statues, including Sir Winston Churchill’s on the anniversary of D-Day of all fucking days.

And what does this little cunt do? Get on Twitter and post pictures and locations of various statues that he finds offensive. Of course, I’m sure this was just to inform the public, and to seek out the local authorities to ‘educate’ them into ‘removing’ (a word the BBC used to describe a statue being thrown into a river by a baying mob) these statues.

Certainly not for the mob to go to these places and commit wanton criminal damage.

I didn’t see him posting pictures of Karl Marx’s statue or Nelson Mandela’s. Marx was the father of communism and therefore responsible for more death than any other human in history. Mandela was a terrorist who blew up kids in a shopping centre. His wife burned others to death (including kids) that she did not trust. There was no map and rant in such cases.

No, let’s have it right. This shit stirring, race baiting, degenerate communist was urging others, by using his influence (thanks BBC, again) to commit criminal damage and go on rampages in an attempt to ‘tear down the system’.

He’s been quiet lately but the cunt is back with a cuntish bang I’m afraid.

And isn’t incitement to riot a crime? Alas, I think the police are too busy taking a knee and applauding the riots to notice…

Nominated by Cuntybollocks

Greta Thunberg [8]

Greta Thunderthighs.

Yes, the spoon faced halfwit is back to thrill the hysterical bandwagon jumping morons in her thrall. I picked up a couple of salient points from her latest inspirational utterings:

The response to covid should also be the response to climate change. Yes, worldwide bankruptcy is the way to go. And The BLM movement is part of the challenge and support. Not sure what the fuck this means, but as it is also hysterical fucking nonsense I suppose it makes sense to Greta and her fellow morons.

Anyway, as soon as restrictions are lifted Greta will be bunking off her special school and coming our way. In an environmentally friendly multi million pound yacht no doubt.
Rejoice. At safe distance. On the first Friday you should be back at school.

Nominated by: Cuntstable Cuntbubble

The Black Hole Of Brussels

Please send money for we are poor


IsAC regulars will know that I have a visceral hatred of the EU which borders on the pathological. Hardly a day passes without something new to remind me of my abject loathing of the bastards, and today is no exception.
So what’s boiling my piss this time? Well in April, Ursula von der Leyen unveiled a £2.7 bill. ‘coronavirus relief package’, with funds to be distributed throughout the bloc. The UK recently paid £750 mill. into this fund, but now the EU is demanding that we throw another £270 mill. of our wedge in the direction of the financial Black Hole of Brussels. This is on the basis that (get this) ‘the UK remains fully liable to contribute to, and fully eligible to benefit from, the fund’. So cough up, say the Brussels’ bandits, or guess what, the UK-EU trade talks will be ‘jeopardised’.
Now I stand to be corrected, but I was under the impression that the UK left the EU on 1st January. Okay, no doubt we have residual obligations to contribute to EU finances under the Withdrawal Agreement, but as I see it, the ‘recovery fund’ was formulated in the wake of the C-19 pandemic, ie AFTER we had left. On this basis, it’s unclear to me why we’ve actually ended up agreeing to contribute anything at all to this fund in the first place.
Notwithstanding the circumstances, the Brussels weasels are maintaining that we are ‘fully eligible to benefit’ from the scheme. Now I call that downright neighbourly of them, so let’s have a look at how this might actually work in the event that we throw this extra £270 mill. into the pot (put the matter of our involvement and initial contribution to the fund to one side for now). Let’s say that in its infinite generosity, Brussels graciously awards us £50-60 mill. (we could of course get fuck all, but that that would put Brussels in a very bad light politically). The funds will arrive with due fanfare, wrapped in sparking paper with a huge red bow, labelled ‘a generous gift to the people of the UK from the EU’. Remoaners will jump up and down, cheering such munificence, and shout from the rooftops about the abundance of benefits which flow from EU membership. ‘Look how foolish we were to leave!’ they’ll trill. Meanwhile of course, the reality of the situation is that we’ll be out of pocket to the tune of another £200 mill. plus.
The are two things absolutely nailed on when it comes to the UK’s financial dealings with the Bastards of Brussels; no matter how much we give them, they always want more, and we always get back less than we put in. No wonder they’re gagging for an extension to the Brexit transition period. They see us as their ever-full ATM. You honestly couldn’t make this shit up. Fuck off you grasping, parasitic cunts. Enough already.

Nomintated by Ron Knee