I am convinced my fellow cunters will enjoy getting their teeth into this nom.

My local online rag comments section usually brings out the simpering, cat loving, weedy sort who aspire to be on a parish council as some sort of social status. However on this occasion I find myself agreeing with them.

This is a story (I really wish it was a work of fiction, but sadly not) about a school in my area who’s headmaster has decided to allow (well…I’m not going to say, as it is so piss boiling I will let cunters read the link) Anyhow…….unsurprisingly the comments section has gone ballistic, and with good reason. Cunters….this is what happens when woke kids grow up and become woke headmasters.

Ladies and gentlemen….we are going backwards with any evolution we may have had. We know that, otherwise why do we need security guards in fast food restaurants?

Why are smart clothes going out of fashion and the likes of sports direct clothing people for ‘Sunday best’?

Why are the police and hospitals just now another branch of social services to provide counselling at the expense of preventing crimes and healing genuinely ill patients?

Why are those that correct peoples spelling and grammar chastised online for being pedants, rather than being respected for trying to keep hold of higher standards? (You missed out a question mark, ffs!!! – Day Admin)

Why is there no shame anymore in the way people look, talk and express themselves?

Criticism is met with new laws to prevent alternative opinions being aired.

This is the society we are being allowed to happen….and we are fucked.

KentOnLine

Nominated by: Chuff Chugger

And while we’re on the subject of mental health – genuine or otherwise, here’s this rather brief nom from Sam Beau

Young People

I would have thought that this would already have been cunted, but if not, …

BBC News

Sorry, I have no more words – however, if you let this short nom through, Admin, I`m sure its brevity will be swamped by voracious responses (if I`m reading the audience right).

Apparently, “white gaze” (yet another pernicious import from America) is the assumption that the default reader or observer is coming from a perspective of someone who identifies as white, or that people of colour sometimes feel need to take into account the white reader or observer’s reaction.

Various authors of colour describe it as a voice in their heads that reminds them that their writing, characters, and plot choices are going to be judged by white readers, and that the reader or viewer, by default, is white.

Err… if you say so…. In other words, black racism.

Or, in the context of this nomination, the banning of white people from attending a theatre in the West End of London on certain nights. Apartheid anyone?

Daily Mail

From the article:

Playwright Jeremy O Harris told BBC Sounds yesterday he was ‘so excited’ to put on nights in the West End where tickets were only sold to people who identified as black.

‘One of the things we have to remember is that people have to be radically invited into a space to know that they belong there and in most places in the west, poor people and black people have been told that they do not belong inside the theatre. For me, as someone who wants and yearns for black and brown people to be in the theatre, who comes from a working class environment, who wants people who do not make six figures to feel like theatre is a place for them, it is a necessity to radically invite them in with initiatives that say “you’re invited”. Specifically you.”’

Asked if it didn’t make him uncomfortable that in turn it was telling white people they weren’t allowed in the space, he responded: ‘There are a litany of places in our country that are generally only inhabited by white people, and nobody is questioning that, and nobody is saying that by inviting black audiences here you are uninvited.’

(Bollocks. There are no places in the UK where black people are banned. More’s the pity some would say.)

One senior Tory MP, who did not want to be named, raised questions over the decision to bar white people from the show, telling MailOnline: ‘I understand the subject matter of the show may have particular resonance for some but I would simply question the legality of this? In other circles it would be illegal and racial discrimination. I don’t understand why this isn’t.’

Precisely.

Nominated by: Shit Cake Baker

And on a similar note, there’s this from Balsamic Dave

I don’t know if this one has already been nom’d, but the producers of race-baiting theatre production “Slave Play” have declared their intention to hold two performances for black-only audiences so that those assembled can enjoy the production “free from the white gaze”.

Now let’s indulge a brief thought experiment. Let’s reverse the scenario and have a play devoted to the theme of being white; shall we call it “Hard Working Play”. Let’s have two evenings where we have white-only audiences, this initiative devised to allow an all white audience to enjoy the spectacle “free from the black gaze”. That’d go down just fine, wouldn’t it everyone?

This preposterous “blacks only” restriction also demands the question who does and does not qualify as “black”? Will one half of a mixed race couple have to stay at home? Will someone born of one white and one black parent only be allowed to stay until half time? Can Gary Lineker tag along? Would Michael Jackson be shown the door?

I’d say this lot more than deserve to take a bow for being the bunch of cunts they so clearly are.

ITV News

It is Sunday afternoon. A portly old fucker, in late middle age can be seen ripping off Kim Leadbetter’s jockstrap after this weeks walking football match for old fogies and with much huffing, puffing and farting he dashe off to the meeja and gives one of his outraged diatribes about one of his favourite topics.Not tranny rights (or lefts) this time, no this is MUCH more serious. VERY serious indeed. It’s Dame Kweer and he is talking about Islamophobia:

Keir Starmer accuses ‘weak’ Rishi Sunak of harbouring ‘extremists’ in his party

Keir Starmer accuses ‘weak’ Rishi Sunak of harbouring ‘extremists’ in hi…
The Labour leader spoke out after the Tory party suspended Lee Anderson over comments he made about the mayor of…

You have to grant it to the old wankstain – he has chutzpah!. Extremists in the Conservative Party (well, one anyway. allegedl) , when he has any number of antiSemites, Islam worshipping lesbos and fags, whom he seems to be deaf and dumb to, due his innate cowardice.

Kweer Starmer was jumping on the “Islamaphobia” bandwagon yesterday, but he might overplay his hand. He clearly doesn’t realise that it is traditional Labour voters who have to put up with the Islamification of places like East London and though they might be too scared to say so, agree with Lee Anderson, and if Labour bring in their “anti Islam” laws they might well lose a large number of voters. I still don’t think he will get the landslide he is expecting, which is just as well. I think people see him for the mouth and trousers fake he is.

Of course, things might change, and if, by next week, the public have the balls to realise what Mr Anderson was saying is demonstrably true, Auntie Kweer might well change his mind again. I won’t gold my breath though. Islam is Labour’s latest “victim”

Sky news

Nominated by W C Boggs.

Bonds are an Australian underwear giant which include brands like Jockey and Champion in their mix. Yeah, never heard of Bonds until the other day. Having looked at their website, some of their underwear is horrible and wearing it would make me feel like Nora Batty.

Why is this company of interest you ask? Well, apart from being another company in a long line of companies banging on about sustainability and inclusivity, Bonds’ inclusivity schtick includes a ‘gender free’ underwear section on their website which showcases males and females wearing the same garments.

This does not offend me, in fact the models sporting their gender free garments verge on the amusing. I don’t think I’m supposed to laugh though. Bonds only came to my attention because of their latest underwear for Pride campaign which caused a backlash which was reported in the media, so I thought I’d do some reading about them. (Below is a link from The Metro, who couldn’t understand why there was a backlash.)

MSN News

Here’s the thing, at last. Bonds support a transgender charity for children called ‘minus 18′. Yes a multi-million dollar business just have to support this particular thing, thereby completing their woke marketing trifecta of sustainability, inclusivity and trans. Helping the homeless or giving to cancer is so yesterday.

If you want to bag yourself some ugly underwear and think this charity is brilliant, fear not, you can make a donation to the charity on Bonds’ check out, how convenient!

Minus 18

Nominated by: Cuntologist

 
Oh lordy, will all this wokery never end?

The BBFC has become the latest organisation to wet the bed and fall over itself in a pathetic effort to appease professional offence takers. What’s it done then? Taken a stand against orgies of violence and sex on screen? Er, no. The BBFC has (wait for it) decided that its certification for the 1964 classic ‘Mary Poppins’ must be revised from ‘U’ to ‘PG’, because of *gasp* two uses of ‘racially discriminatory’ language.

I’m sure the matter is scorched into the psyche of cunters everywhere. I well remember swooning with shock as I watched the scene where the sweeps dance on the rooftop. From nearby, the batty character ‘Admiral Boom’ yells ‘we’re being attacked by Hottentots!’ before firing fireworks at them. ‘Hottentots’, as I’m sure every shocked viewer is aware, has been added to the ever-increasing list of words deemed offensive by some busybody or other.

But why stop there? After all, the chimney sweeps were ‘blacked up’. Disney should be censured for this inflammatory imagery. And what about Dick van Dyke’s insult
to native Londoners with his disgraceful racist mockery of their accent? I’m grossly offended by this crude and shameful caricature. Should he apologise? ‘Indoobitubly, Bary Boppins’.

Oh dear. I’m so overcome that I think I’ve peed my pants.

Scotsman

Nominated by Ron Knee with a second dose of sugar/shit on a spoon from Chuff Chugger below.

I second this on the basis only the very active ‘woke’ community who actively go out their way to look for this sort of thing would know what that word meant. I mean, I am a 60 year old bloke and never heard of it….and took no notice of it either when i would have been of the age group it was intended for when I first saw the film. when you are 8 years old so so there are a lot of words you don’t know the meaning of, but it didn’t detract from the enjoyment of the film and neither did I instantly become a racist because of some of those words.

I am very much looking forward to several traditional plays from Shakespeare being censored or ‘revised’ in due course due to the use of now defunct words.

I must also add, whilst watching that episode of top gear where they built a bridge over the river kwai? and used the word ‘slope’, I had never heard of that as a derogatory term to our slitty eyed friends, and I only became aware of its meaning in the context they subliminally meant AFTER they were told to apologise. and I don’t think I’m that uneducated.

Capital I Chuff Chugger capital I C.A.