are a cunt.
October’s nudist’s cunting had a bbc link. Clicked the thing. Amid real heavy hitters therein such as the cancelled nudist walk, and the rambler who stepped in some cunts scattered ashes at a beauty spot (and called the bbc to whinge) ; one short curt headline further down caught my eye.
Well, ”brothers jailed for raping 12 y.o” just wasn’t an everyday type of headline ‘in my day’. And if it DID happen ib those days, front and centre in the headlines.
Scum. Vermin. Millions in costs. All the rest. The new (ab)normal. But ‘still’, someone might say, .. ‘at least they have the story up, albeit low key. When that Ethiopean cunt kicked the heads of the two wpc’s earlier this year, no-one at all carried it.
And to that person, I would say… swing and a miss.
Because if you’ve read the bbc link about what these two cunts did, and think therefore you’ve been informed, then read the alternative link’s coverage of the same atrocity or is it atrocities?
Spot any differences?
Depraved indifference bordering on attempted murder? A rape baby for the taxpayer to pay for. A previous conviction by the older cunt, for … ‘something’ … and so on.
‘Tell the truth and shame the devil’ was a phrase a long time ago. Looks like it didnt have much effect in ‘future bbc workers’ households. At the very least tell the full story, or don’t tell it at all. Leaving out such pertinent tenets is defacto lying by omission.
If that diseased cunt saw fit to DO what he did, .. why can’t you see fit to tell it?
Nominated by Cuntemall.




