The Sydney Sweeney haters are a bunch of hatchet faced bitter cunts.
Women athletes the world over are having a pile on on the epically gorgeous Sydney Sweeney because she did an advert for some sports gambling brand in which she used various bits of sporting paraphernalia to disguise her delectable modesty.
Cue the ugly women’s athletics brigade all outraged that Ms Sweeney should – by their assertion – diminish women’s sporting achievements in this way. They are also disgusted that in the modern era women should, in their words, monetise their bodies and sexualise the arena of their sporting activities. Presumably their objection is rooted in the insinuation that most men would rather enjoy, and be happy to see women financially rewarded for, the spectacle of a near naked sex goddess flaunting her considerable assets in a sports setting, than they would take an interest in any wimminz actual sporting activities. Correct. Us men couldn’t give a fuck if your best girly performer leapt over some sandpit, managing about a third of the distance of the bottom rated in the entire world lazy eyed fat boy from school. And you’ll find that a lot of women agree with us in writing off women’s sport as mostly boring at best, often embarrassing in its effort to claim to offer everything that men’s sport does by way of achievements and entertainment.
Furthermore, what exactly, as a bunch of liberated feminists, is your problem with Sydney using her god-given talents to her uniquely feminine advantage? Could it be that you’re all just bitter and twisted that she’s got the kind of bod and bazookas you could only ever dream of? Or perhaps it’s the following facts from Wikipedia that get right up your nose:
“In 2021, Sweeney purchased a 3,200-square-foot (300 m2) Tudor-style home in Los Angeles for US$3 million. In 2023, she bought a US$9.9 million “fixer-upper mansion” in Los Angeles’s Bel Air neighborhood, and in 2024 she bought a US$13.5 million home in the Florida Keys.”
What’s more, where’s all the “women can do what they want with their bodies” chanters when you need them? I thought feminists were supposed to be pro- women getting ahead in the world and doing it any way they wanted, and doing just what the fuck they want with their own bodies. Turns out the kind of fems who want you to be able to do what you want with your body, sister, are only of that opinion if your body is also a hirsute unwashed shapeless heap like theirs.
It’s these same sisters that hounded the Formula One pit girls and the page 3 models out of their jobs, claiming to be standing up for wimminz rights as they did so.
Face it bints, no one wants to watch you in any sporting context, but if you’ve got tats and a bod like the fair Ms Sweeney go ahead and flaunt it and earn your three mansions with the unreserved blessings of the entire heterosexual male species.
Nominated by : Balsamic Dave
With sloppy seconds provided by Norman:
Seconded, Dave.
Funny how these so called ‘feminists’ always hate attractive young women. I recall that Clare Short minger openly targeting Page 3 Girls in the 80s. Also, funny how all these feminists are ugly fuckers as well. This currnent hatred towards Sydney is no different.
May I just add the comment:
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&hs=tN3V&sca_esv=a6b539e48a8c50fd&hl=en&sxsrf=APpeQnvNB93mJQ_l69Q0LSVRFDG5PG-L3A:1790662356019&udm=2&fbs=ABfTbFUxGEP8yeZbmk97ajdTjIq-1SYeWocr-JQ01ak8-2VFVc-G1_pZrygIAtw89UfRnn1bAVjyn9ttUnU9Fr7LbpM23Zh6MYW7LvxqLR-EqiPaC8Vk9LIuNsBRb1QofdP2npH4qGwJ8rE1RrruWQmdLsDLXeDsUKx6yed9HjIWDr18hoQfU_gDekD-qXv3YVXXh9kPBVcnXJtnsLlZWmV3oInDycqXNB9sscT8EWDrXcKzU98uVDc&q=sydney+sweeney+nude&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi2mZKNkZOXAxWHXEEAHa-bADgQtKgLegQIFRAB&biw=375&bih=616&dpr=3#sv=CAMSVxoyKhBlLUpxQy16ZHQydEpuMmdNMg5KcUMtemR0MnRKbjJnTToONEtxRVV5Y2cyWWViWE0gBCoXCgFzEhBlLUpxQy16ZHQydEpuMmdNGAEwAUoECAEQAhgHILLd94QLSggQAhgBIAIoAQ
I think that says everything that needs to be said
3
Thank you so much Dave, that has brightened up a. dull, wet, Tuesday morning.
3
If women sports persons all wore burques then there wouldn’t be a single male that would watch them.
The same goes for men.
Mrs Cunter watches football, obviously.
But she looks forward to the players taking off their shirts at the end of the game.
That’s the way things are and have always been.
Miss Sweeney is moderately attractive in my opinion, but I really have little interest in blondes.
I haven’t seen her body, but judging by her investments, she is an intelligent woman.
Intelligence and good looks are two things that most feminists can’t relate to.
Good morning.
3
Sydney is experiencing that with celebrity comes a horde of do as I say Karen’s, lefty know it all, and the i know best crowd.
my advice?
ignore them and double down.
if you give in to them once you’ll be doing it forever.
Maybe release a series of photos of yourself naked and flicking your bean while about to eat a banana?
just a suggestion.
otherwise you’ll look like fisheyed placater and soft twat Ed Sheeran.
rather than bleat how he’s just a performer when the Palestinian lot pressured him,
what he should of said was
” fuck Palestine. I hope the cunts get wiped slaughtered, I despise the cunts.
and Macklemore was sacked because he’s a spastic.
now fuck off.”
drop the mic,
walk off stage
enjoy the jaws hitting the floor
6
Ugly jealous feminists are ultimately responsible for the reason why they is no more F1 Pit Lane Pussy. The same reason goes with other sports, along with those long gone sometimes explicit calenders we once saw hanging up in the works office.
4
I notice Amy no tit’s the athlete criticising Sweeney is as flat as a ironing board.
nobody will be asking her for a photo shoot or wet tshirt competition.
stop whining and get a booboo Amy,
you look like a lad.
4
boobjob.
this fuckin phones got the same IQ as Macklemore
4
And the irony is that witches have always been known to have flat tits too Mis.
4
She should parade into the house of commons…and I’ll wager they’d still not be able to define a ♀️😩…of course a few would give her a run for her money dress wise…oooh minister 👠👒
2
It would seem they’re implying that to advertise a product or service, you must be proven to be affiliated with it in some past or present sense, and in no way be attractive.
In which case, the latest Persil adverts featuring Peter Crouch should be withdrawn immediately.
I’m offended that Persil portray any bloke who knows how to use a washing machine as a goofy, lanky, gormless ugly cunt.
In fact, I was so appalled that I contacted the BBC’s sob story department.
Strangely, they still haven’t got back to me.
4
You have to admire Peter crouch’s honesty.
When asked what he would be if he wasn’t a footballer, Peter’s response was “A virgin”.
At least he’s realistic in terms of his ability to resemble Pullug out of the Bash St. kids.
2
Plug FFS!
Fucking phone keeps autocorrecting things that were right the first time.
It’s that AI bollocks that you can’t fully turn off. 🤬
0
BREAKING NEWS..
Fat ugly munters, hate attractive sexy women..
3
It may come as a major shock to these feminazi’s, but recent research has suggested that advertising products that are predominantly aimed at men using attractive young wimminz is proven to be effective.
Whereas using not so attractive young wimminz with ironing board chests and neck and arm muscles like Mike Tyson are proven to be precisely otherwise.
Live with it!
4
I’ve long believed that a lot of what motivates certain aspects of “feminism” for certain varieties of women, is based on a mating strategy. Undermine the more beautiful women to enhance your odds of landing a man. It’s lizard stuff.
Other factors:
– Pushed by capital to get women working and thereby reduce the wage bill. Make out it is a noble cause about liberation. Most women have been shafted by it.
– Me me me, narcissistic, I want x y and z dressed up as a pseudo ideology.
– Used to undermine men by selfish, disordered women who believe themselves to be in competition with and equal to men but know (possibly) that they need special pleading to succeed.
– Helped to achieve basic equality of rights many decades ago, long since redundant.
Feminism isn’t really all that much to do with the feminine. What could be more feminine than Sydney Sweeney, in appearance anyway? She is beautiful and successful, and can win the game by looking good. This is the biggest bugbear of all to certain kinds of women, and the feminist movement. That women are still essentially beauty objects whilst men are essentially success objects. These are the biological facts. The rest is window dressing.
3
She’s got:
Good looks
Money.
Celebrity.
Not stuck in a mundane life.
What’s not to hate…😂
3
The wimminz hating on Sydney usually resemble a badly shaved Wookie or a pig peeping through a fence.
Most are way beyond the boundaries of even a six pint charity shag.
1
I bet the ad company all sat together and brainstormed
‘ what could encourage people to look at our ads and our brand ?’, as you would expect.
Then some genius said ‘ remember when Sidney Sweeney did that jeans thing? What if..?’
Well done, that man!
Also, what happened to My body, my choice?
0