A more rotund lady for those who like fatties. C.A.
are cunts.
The Chairman,
Marks & Spencer plc,
London W1
Dear Sir,
It has come to my attention that your erstwhile august institution has started selling ladies’ unmentionables with a slit in the front. I am informed that this is to permit the interpolation of a gentleman’s pintle into the lady’s monosyllable without the need to remove said lady’s bloomers..
As loyal M&S customers, I wish to inform you that my good lady wife and I have never partaken of such lascivious behaviour, nor do we wish to start now. Who are these undergarments aimed at – your customer base or Mrs Price and Mrs Rayner?
In the past my good lady wife’s St Michael drawers gave her much-needed relief from a chill on her kidneys, and when the elastic finally succumbed we used them as windfall catchers underneath our apple tree. Your latest offering wouldn’t catch an acorn.
If you do not return to selling undergarments of their former quality we will be taking our business elsewhere.
Faithfully yours,
Disgusted,
Tunbridge Wells
Nominated by Geordie Twatt.
And for the gentleman who prefers the larger lady, here’s a more stimulating image, sure to give you a diamond-cutter:
https://share.google/zbrZ3hdXITzZCl7NQ
6
I clicked…🤮, you bastard..😂
5
You broke the first rule of ISAC
2
They are all a bit…… taller than I expected.
4
Posh birds wear knickers, never trust em.
4
Having just researched the author of the article linked, she strikes me more as the fur coat no knickers type despite her aversion to the crotchless nonsense.
My personal feeling is all ladies if a certain size and above should be forced to wear marine grade smell proof fabric garments, fully crotched and visually unappealling. Though this is not limited to the larger lady either, theres more than plenty rather fragrant slimmer ones out there too.
2
Or muzzles to stop them being so huge.
2
Dunno what your lots problem is.
I find them very comfortable and liberating.
2
sold.
they’re great.
probably cheap too?
seeing as mainly made of holes.
well done Mark’s an Spencer,
I thought you just made incontinence nappies and string vests.
1
Rampant transphobia.
If a man who became a woman by thinking they wanted to wore these their bollockś would fall out.
What a fucking disgrace.
2
practical.
in a rush and bursting for a tomtit?
no time wasted dropping your keks
and easier to wipe your arse.
Need a gypsy but toilets in use?
just piss down your leg, empty your shoe,
good to go.
This is groundbreaking for the modern.woman.
a busy independent bossy Karen
she hasn’t got time for fuckin about taking down her knickers for a slash or Eartha Kitt.
These free her up to spend more time filing sexual harassment claims and complaining about men.
4
The thieving bastards are getting away with selling nothing. The most important part of the knickers are the crutch. What are ladies of a certain age going to do about the little dribble’s of piss that arrive later after a slash and for gentlemen such as me who indulge in a little bit of crutch sniffing.
1
The crafty bastards are encouraging the ladies to buy two pairs of knickers for wearing at the same time. There are still lots of women who use period pads. I still tell the joke about them being swinging hammocks for lazy cunts.
0
I have arseless underpants. They werent originally back in the 80s.
2
I prefer panties, proper ones not the dental floss type, crotch less are pointless may as well just wear a suspenders belt and stockings with no nickers at all.
Having recovered from the ‘safe pic’ posted by Thomas, time for a lie down
1
I’ll bet this chap was wearing a pair of those..🤮
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbHRhsnBCEE/?igsh=a25lbHoxaW41dzRx
1