Time to stop same sex couples adopting?
Jamie Varley and his equally loathsome partner John McGowan- Fuckface have been found guilty of numerous offences in relation to the death of Preston. They are due to be sentenced on the 18th of June and, as feet first into a wood chipper isn’t on the cards, we can only hope for a long time inside.
I also hope that one of the “lessons that is learned ” is that same sex couples no longer be allowed to adopt.
I’m sure that there are plenty of truly lovely people out there who would make wonderful parents, but surely this case highlights that even one Preston is one too many.
Yes, I know that there’s potentially as much risk with a traditional pair, but I can’t help feeling that warning signs were overlooked or ignored ,that would not otherwise have been, because someone was afraid of being thought transphobic.
This fear of being thought phobic in some way, be it of race, religion or sexual preference, is making cowards of people. Who cares if someone thinks you’re transphobic or whatever.
Better to be wrong and say sorry than have another Preston, or Henry.
Nominated by Jeezum Priest.
“Yes, I know that there’s potentially as much risk with a traditional pair”
Heartily concur with the nom, but I think if we were measuring risk I’d say de facto there is potentially far more risk with a pair of homosexual candidate parents.
Any normally minded homosexual would understand that one of the costs of their nature is being disqualified from eligibility for parenting; and those who refuse to accept this and push to procure a child who will be brought up in an environment and situation utterly contrary to their developmental wellbeing are by definition putting their own needs ahead of the child, and, in all likelihood, don’t give a fuck if they damage the child. This is not the foundation for healthy parenting, and those who allow it are pushing Marxist ideology over actual human rights. As I said the other day, it’s more important to leftist ideologues to be “right” than to do what’s right.
27
Well said Sir well said
4
As one I fully agree. And I’d add that If being gay is part of one’s ‘identity’, ie rainbow shit all over the house on and on socials, that’s a pretty reliable red flag, just like those Zulock demons mentioned below. Ditto aggressively advertising being left wing. Those are the also the predominant BlueSky and gaming platform predator types.
5
A seat is reserved for you at the table of my house any day.
2
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury. I present to you the case of William and Zachary Zulock
William and Zachary Zulock – Wikipedia https://share.google/QMJjnaQ9iTWtSO5ow
100 years each with no chance of parole.
A length of sturdy hemp rope and a nearby tree would have been a better outcome.
11
I’d be interested to know how many bender couples apply to adopt little girls.
Almost none, I’d bet.
25
I would add that I count a number of gay couples amongst friends and clients, and many of them have nieces, nephews, god children on whom they dote and for whom they do a great deal in terms of pastoral and material support. These same gay couples also show no signs of thinking they can con nature and society by “having” children of their own (most of them in fact embrace the upside to being gay, which is you can live life to the full on your terms and not be encumbered by the burden of parenthood).
The type of gay person that doggedly pursues having their own children is, in all certainty, the type that is more concerned with making a point (at best, at worst something far more sinister) and shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near children full stop.
24
for a person to be well adjusted they neef a mother and father .
its natural.
Always been that way for hundreds of thousands of years.
same in the rest of the animal kingdom.
I dont think all puffs are bad people,
far from it.
But should they be allowed to adopt kids?
no.
The rights of a child top those of two ducky puddleskippers hurty feelings.
20
sorry, if any puffs read this and are offended.
i dont think Fishsupper couples should be allowed to adopt either.
They should just both be sterilised and given a Barbie each.
16
ps
Any trannys shouldnt be allowed within 100 ft of a kid.
they should be bricked to death if applying .
Allah Akbar!
20
The whole idea turned my stomach for these dirty bastards to be aloud to live with each other legally in the first place, never mind being able to adopt a child to practice on as well. Shame and doing their dirty business in secret is all these cunts are fit for.
12
allowed.
3
That Labour minister James Murray shouldnt be allowed alone with a kid.
Neither should Michael Fabricpants..
Both those cunts are sinister and set off my alarm bells ringing.
9
Probably I meant it not to be shouted from the rooftops.
6
It’s a sin, the bible says so, I blame pride and all that mincing.
Proud to be gay, why and look what has happened since, not just the man/man or woman/woman we have a complete range of deviants.
Disgusted (formerly of Tunbridge Wells)
11
Take heed Sick of it and all.
The fucking yanks have also a lot to pay the cavaliers for stealing their happiness. All wrong doings seem to stem from hamshankland. They should’ve been set adrift from being Canada’s toilet when the earth was flat.
3
The state does not care about children or older people. It never has, They are a burden. Children need bringing up and educating. Older people know too much and clutter up the place.
Good morning, everyone.
10
I’m already in my second childhood, TTCS and ready for what they want to throw at me.
3
Always be on a high state of alert, Sammy. They are out to get us.
4
Fortunately I live by the sea, where the place is swarming with the elderly, TTC. I apparently look younger than most and help them out in my spare time.
3
These dirty bastards should only be allowed to live with each other if they practice the scene in Edward ll with the red hot poker.
7
Fuck me, bet that stung in the morning owwwwh bollocks.
4
It’s all well and good the adoption agency saying they conduct rigorous and strict checks on potential adopters, but where were the rigorous and strict checks after the child was handed over?
Varley was a teacher, he would already have had a DBS, and although they could carry out another, the result still would have been the same.
Clean DBS or not, surely there’s always the possibility, however small, that the reason they haven’t knowingly offended is because the opportunity (direct access to a child, in this case) was never available to them before.
With that in mind, would it not be sensible to carry out regular physical checks, perhaps every couple of weeks, to ensure the child has not been injured or fiddled with, rather than just blithely letting them get on with it?
And whilst they’re at it, perhaps the adoptive parents could be made to give full and unfettered access to their phones and other devices for regular checks.
I’d apply this to all adoptive parents, regardless.
Mind you, none of this alters the fact that same sex adoption is an unethical practice on all sorts of levels.
But we are where we are at the moment, so a little more care and attention clearly wouldn’t go amiss.
11
You just know the adoption agency were creaming themselves at being so woke that they had given a small child to a couple of sexual deviants.
They should have their day in court too.
20
Exactly.
accountability.
These decisions they mske effect kids lives.
a 10 yr prison sentence will make them think on it.
17
Aye and the same appoint at Tyburn.
Unaccountable woke bureaucracy is a tyranny.
Cunts.
Good morning.
14
I’ve no doubt, Odin, that the adoption agency are given equality and diversity targets to meet.
Perhaps even a bonus.
10
If you cannot naturally have kids then as a same sex couple you should not be allowed to adopt. If you chose to be a bender then its one of the many drawbacks to being a sexual deviant.
It boggles my mind how anyone can hurt small kids, automatic hanging for any of these bastards.
18
they should be given a muppet for 3 years.
On inspection if kermits arse is ripped apart theyre disqualified.
or a blow up doll in a school uniform.
11
This could work well,if Kermit and the doll could be tested for AIDS at the end of the Parole period.
11
my fingers are too big for this fuckin phone😡
i keep putting ‘s’ instead of ‘a’
makes me look like im lisping.
like Cuntengine.
11
Giving benders kids to adopt must have started off as an experiment.
But there is little point in having an experiment if you don’t take any notice of the end results.
I wonder how many boys (and it’s always boys) that have been brought up by gay couples end up being gay themselves.
It’s documented that there is a high likelihood that pedophiles and other serious sex offenders are victims of sexual abuse in their childhood themselves.
How many present day nónçés and rapists were brought up in single sex households?
These things we will never know.
But someone does and it’s been kept from us.
12
its made for inferior korean fingers.
little yellow fingers like a kids.
not sturdy Englishman fingers.
Michael Jackson could have avoided a lot of negative publicity if he employed a korean ‘milker’.
when the king of pop got all hot under the collar watching Grange Hill or Runaround,
bring in the korean with his tiny hands.
He could tug on Michaels odd brown and white winky like a melted choc ice,
michael could shut his eyes an pretend it was mackauley Culkin.
No court case or police house searches at Neverland.
11
OT. Review of MP security needed after Widdecombe death, Burnham says…
What about the security of everyone else? You know, the General Public?
The Manchester Arena, Lee Rigby, Henry Nowak, the Children In Need Poster Boy Southport Treeswinger Child Murderer.
14
You can’t have babies because you’re a man Stan.
It’s deviant, the same people who’ve done everything they can to destroy the nuclear family are now putting babies into the hands of gay men.
Nope. I’m not ok with this.
No I don’t think all gay men are a threat to kids but a high percentage of gay men live a lifestyle totally built around sex
13
Let’s not forget also, that when these two vile creatures were skipping around with joy like a pair of pansies when their application was accepted, there would have been some perfectly acceptable heterosexual couple told to fuck off.
Just imagine being a married heterosexual couple trying for years to conceive, but being pushed down the list for cunts like this in the name of diversity.
And now they’ll all have to jump through even more hoops because of these fucking deviants.
17
Let’s not forget their vile enablers from “Social Services”..
Total box ticking cunts.
16
Piano tamperer Elton John too.
imagine if you were adopted by Reg and his ducky husband?!!
christ.
The pisstaking at school.
cruel.
parents day 😃😄
dreading school sports day and Elton in the egg an spoon race against the normal parents.
fuck me.
11
Just release the sick fucks into the general prison population at once. Both these botty boys would be mincemeat in hours. Let the punishment fit the crime, agonising pain on a daily basis.
14
How about making sure that the cunts who allowed the ‘adoption’ face justice as well,sick of the same old lessons will be learned mantra that follows ALL these cases … office meeting after similar case…’who signed off on the 90 year old local flasher adopting the 14 year old girl’……😩 ‘i will have to take your afternoon break off you for today, let that be a lesson for you’….get fucked
10
That works for me. I don’t know if those cunts would like it though. Tough shit, general population now.
1
Its as plain as the spunk on their faces. The government charges the laws to suit their own perversion’s.
8
Change. I must have my eyes examined.
2
The old Testament has really good advice..!
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2018%3A22&version=NIV
8
There it is in black and white, Doc.
Yet the Church of England decided that bit didn’t count anymore.
No wonder Christianity is dying in this country.
5
Dying on its arse seems more apt.
3
I’m still laughing at the time when I was young, when all arse bandits were treated with electric shock treatment. I’m sure with modern technology it can be done. Pity they changed the law to suit themselves.
6
If a heterosexual couple want to adopt, at least one of them would be required to be some sort of darkıe.
8
This little lad so cruelly abused mentally and physically was taken from a loving foster home and handed to these dead men walking. He was taken to AE at least three times with injuries that most people would regard as odd after listening to the pathetic outpourings off his”parents”. Then he was murdered by them. The main antagonist putting on a frankly pathetic show of lies and cries. Eternal damnation for these two after a surprise party at the prison. Damm them to a really nasty place iHell
14
I think it is highly suspicious when two benders want to adopt a boy (and for different reasons two dykes want to adopt a girl), but it is not just singe sex couples – take poor old Tristram(?) Starmer’s son, – not only have they given him a poncy Labourite upper-middle class name, but he must spend all his time at school like Neil Sutherland in the In-Betweeners saying “Oi – my dad ain’t bent” (‘He is a BIT though”), and what about butch buck teethed Jess Phillips and her “husband” Mr Phillips, the wet-wipe. That man hater has a son, God help him – I wonder if she had him castrated?. Probably bit his balls off at birth with her horse teeth.
Some people should just not have children full stop – my wife should not have done. She was about as maternal as John Wayne. It gives a child a very rocky start in life.
Where homosexualists are concerned like that old woman Elton John and his “husband” David Furnish are concerned, and Tom Duckie-Daley and his American husband are concerned, they would have been better advise to buy a poodle or a Chihuahua. Interestingly, both have boys.
Every cloud has a silver lining – lets just be grateful Dame Peter Mandelson and his toyboy husband never adopted. I am sure Pete’s mate Epstein would have loved an introduction for his “special friends” like Mandy.
An adopted child who will often suffer extra problems should go to a normal stable family, no ifs and no buts. Especially no butts.
10
These lazy arse bandits should go to the trouble of putting some of their spunk towards a test tube baby of their own, where there’s less chance of them abusing their own. That should become the law in future. No adopted abuse.
4
Remember back in the late 90s, the first sodomitical ‘couple’ to adopt children who legally have two ‘fathers’?
The more effeminate one and his new ‘partner’ are being charged with sex crimes.
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15919257/Britains-gay-dad-52-partner-32-charged-18-offences-including-paying-sexual-services-child-rape.html
Barrie Drewitt-Barlow along with his ‘partner’ Tony were gushed over in the media at the time.
12
I’m old enough to remember when the world was sane Cuntrarian. A time when perverts requesting they be supplied with a baby boy would have produced a robust response from the police. Preston would still be alive. Sending your son to school in a skirt would have produced the same response. Talk about going to hell in a hand basket.
4