Speech/quotation marks are an enduring cunt representing the bottomless pit of declining journalism.
Above link as an example, even the last bastion (chuckle) of the English language, the BBC is at it, low grade non journalists churning out probable AI powered stories absolutely full of speech marks.
Turning the blandest of non story into something supposedly newsworthy with the overuse of speech marks along the way, is it a mere reflection of the loss of English amongst English speakers or is it cunts thinking they are clever? I suspect both but leaning towards the former.
I also suspect saying “the former” would confuse em.
Nominated by : Cunt of the Isles
No shiny shirts from me
1
Bun -sen
0
Hehehe,
if you type Bun#en burner on here your post dissappear into the Twilight Zone.
How peculiar.
wonder why?
hardly offensive
0