Stephen Fry is a cunt, isn’t he.

Fry has said he thinks the Elgin Marbles should be “returned” to Greece. Zzzz.

If we listened to this waffling, aloof bore, a precedent would be set and every museum in the world would have to return artefacts acquired throughout history. Apart from being boring places, you’d have to travel to every country to see items.

Furthermore, Fruity Fry doesn’t mention that the statues were obtained legitimately. He omits a lot, like his rant against Brexit a couple of years back.

This stuffed shirt has always pretended to be an intellectual. However, talking mincingly in a camp aristocratic voice makes you neither intellectual nor classy. He looks unclassy himself. He looks like his breath smells of cheap Chardonnay and dick.

Whether this tubby poo-pusher is virtue-signalling or whether he just wants a bit of attention isn’t clear, or about as clear as Elton John’s back passage. What is clear is that Fry is a fat, fudge-nibbling, fake-intellectual, ferociously boring cunt.

Times News Link

Nominated by: Captain Magnanimous

So this opinionated woke Trump hater has been fired by CNN. Why? Because he had been trying to get fellow hacks to go easy on his big brother, Andrew Cuomo, the Democrat ex-governor of New York state, a fellow hypocrite with wandering hand problems who “resigned” after at least 11 women complained about his fondling and groping activities.

It could not have happened to a nicer Cuomo. At least we won´t see his supercilious face every night as he spews out politically correct bile. Incidentally the link and headline are from the Guardian, not Fox.

Guardian News Link

Nominated by: Mr Polly

I know a lot of members of this site claim to be civil libertarians and will argue against me here.

But I want to put to you all a simple scenario.

You have a vulnerable relative with an underlying medical condition. They can not be vaccinated. Your view is that whether or not to be jabbed is a matter of personal freedom and that anyone who decides not to be should be allowed to go about their lawful business unimpeded. The only trouble is that many of these non-vaxers are tradesmen or carers who may have to enter the home of your vulnerable relative. One who does is a carrier and your loved one is infected by this person. Sadly, they get very ill and then die.

What is your reaction? Are you content that this anti-vaxer preserved their civil liberty even though it cost of your relative? Is that a fair exchange?

I don’t want to hear smokescreen arguments such that the vaccine doesn’t protect everyone or that workers who enter care homes have to pass a flow test.

If someone turns up at your granny’s house she won’t ask them to take a test. What about her freedom FROM being infected by a deadly disease? Anti-vaxers only ever talk about freedoms TO do something. It is just about them with no regard for anyone else. Most have not suffered the loss of loved ones.

No, I don’t advocate people being held down while they are injected. If they won’t participate in the vaccination programme then that’s OK but they will have to accept that their life will be more limited for the sake of the community as a whole. Other countries are making this choice and are being compared with the Nazis. This is a ridiculous argument. The Nazis introduced programmes to kill millions of innocent people, modern governments are doing it to save millions, exactly the opposite reason.

Let’s not get side-tracked by civil liberties. We’ve heard it all before with drink driving, smoking, seat belts et al. All were opposed by the self appointed freedom warriors. What about my simple example of a loved one?

Nominated by: Sir Streeb Greebling

(NOTICE. Play nice please – Day Admin)

The British or at least the English used to love their tea but increasingly the letter T is disappearing from our spoken language.

How many ads or voice overs do we get on tv now which talk of “nin’ee nine pea” and the like?

It was irritating enough when working class white boys started imitating Detroit or Chicago street talk but now it is everywhere.

I was listening to university (or should that be univers’i’ee) students and they were all missin’ Ts from words such as “commun’i’ee”. As well as peppering their sentences with totally unnecessary “likes”. These are supposed to be the future elite.

As well as removing Ts modern talk adds Rs where they don’t belong for example “arksk” instead of “ask” as in “I am arksking you a question.”

To which my response is “Well I’m not answering until you ask it properly and not like some pretend American gangsta.”

These people know that T exists because they (constantly) exclaim “init”. So why don’t they use it to pronounce words properly? Cos they is fick or summin’?

Nomina’ed by Sir Streeb Greebling