I am a cynical cunt, and it’s reports like this that make me so.
This lady decided to attend a pro Palestinan rally in Londonistan with a placard depicting Rishi Sunak and Suella Braverman as coconuts having fallen from a coconut tree.
Her only defence seems to be it was intended to be ‘satirical’ although a dark skinned person being referred to as a coconut is a racial slur meaning dark on the outside, but white on the inside. This is the point the prosecution put forward, and again, she said it wasn’t racist but ‘satirical’ Was she asked why these people were depicted at coconuts? If she was, it certainly wasn’t in the report, and if she wasn’t I really would like to hear her reasons why…as there can be no other reason than what I have described above.
So, why may I ask was she not prosectuted and let free? Here is where my cynical side comes in…….she is a Muslim.
When we have white English being sent down for ridiculously petty and trumped up charges to ‘make a point’ for lesser ‘crimes’ such as hurty words on fakebook I do wonder.
Nominated by : Chuff Chugger
With further legal analysis by Sam Beau:
I`d like to second this cunting by providing another link which totally exonerates the cunt:
Unbelievable.