Woke Identity Politics


Over the last few years I have made very good friends whom are now disingenuously labelled as BAMEs and LGBTs+

I’ve had plenty of conversations with them covering all sorts of issues, not least this current woke bollocks called Identity Politics, which covers a multitude of so called populist issues including sexism, racism, homophobia and so on.

It is true to say that some of my friends have been on the receiving end of some nasty racist/sexist abuse, but for the most part most of that happened well over 5 or so years ago – well before Identity Politics entered the social media arena.

But more recently they’ve been receiving abuse due to the Woke’s virtue signalling agenda and taking every “victim” and lumping them under the BAME and LGBT labels in order for the Woke crusaders to come charging in defending their cause.

What this means, for example, is a good friend of mine who is a black female born in England, but with no political axe to grind is now seen as a victim because the Woke seem to think she needs to be represented on the political stage as a BAME rather than just someone minding their own business.

The same also applies to a couple of gay and lesbian friends, who feel rather pissed off at this proxy representation that has now somehow pushed them into the spotlight under the LGBT+ label, and everyone has to somehow give them special attention and respect because they too are victims as far as the Woke are concerned. Whereas in truth they would rather be left alone and enjoy their ordinary lives as ordinary people.

It seems that the Woke and some chippy minority groups just want to stir the shit for their own political aims, and they want to drag in as many disenfranchised groups to make it look like they’re speaking in their name on the global stage. Whereas in fact they’re just doing it for their own selfish grandstanding. A bit like the leaders of the BLM, most of whom appear to have become millionaires, bought a few mansions in posh WASP areas and quietly distanced themselves from the harsh realities they were supposed to supporting.

Basically its another tail wagging the dog scenario, and yet it seems the dog (the governments, and the silent majority) sits back placidly and lets the minority dictate terms on behalf of the majority.

How the fuck is that democracy in action?

Nominated by: Technocunt

Michael Patrick Turland


My Fellow Cunters.
For your Cuntsideration:

Michael Patrick Turland & the contents of his freezer.

NY Post News Link

A thunk, thunk, thunk-“one-hundredddd aaand eigggggghhhtty” animals found in his freezer, some, by his own admission, frozen alive, cunting please, for this fucking weirdo.

As many will know, many serial killer types, start with extreme animal cruelty, before graduating to human prey.

Whatever you do, don’t stay for dinner?

Nominated by: Cuntfinder General

Justin Welby [17]


The Archbishop of Canterbury is a Cunt

“A man of God! How could you call him such a word?” I hear some say, but bear with me.

Taken from the BBC news article on the matter…
“The government’s plan to send some asylum seekers from the UK to Rwanda is “the opposite of the nature of God”, the Archbishop of Canterbury has said”

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61130841

So, let’s get this right. The importation of 400 plus immigrants from mainly Muslim countries, most of whom have no documents, is godly is it? The erosion of British culture (yes we do have one) and life is godly is it? The bankrupting of the NHS, social security and services, school system etc etc to fund these people is godly is it? Importing men of fighting age from anti-west, muslim countries (some of whom already have their orders to kill innocent people while they are here) is godly is it?

I could go on and on, but you get the point.

I wonder how many of these ponces, terrorists, sex offenders and murderers he’s going to house in Lambeth Palace or his pile in Kent? I’m guessing zero

So, archbishop, you utter traitor and enemy of your own people, you are an absolute cunt and are helping to erode our way of life.

I wonder how liberal the London division of Isis will be with him in ten years when sharia becomes the law of our land? I’m suspecting he and his type will be at the front of the head removal queue outside Finsbury Park mosque come Ramadan 2035.

Nominated by: Horace

Seconded by: Duke of Cuntshire

The Archbishop of Cunterbury.

Yet again, this meddling fuckwit tries to impose stupidity on the ordinary British person.

The Guardian News Link

I don’t suppose this blithering idiot realises that it’s a load of Christian hating Muslims that are trying to get into the country. For the first time in years we can get rid of the filth that undermines the British way of life, and seeks to eliminate the likes of Justin Welby, and this inbred moron opposes the idea.

When is he going to realise that no-one takes him seriously any more, and his opposition to common sense is playing right into Muslim invaders’ hands.

Well I have a solution to your angst Justin, get on the first plane to Rwanda and preach your bullshit there where we don’t have to listen to it.

Cunt.

Speed Limiters


Speed limiters – Big Brother in your cockpit.

An obnoxious piece of legislation is about to be proposed by the Department of Transport in mimicry of the detested EU. The government proposes that all new cars must be fitted with speed limiters. This devil spawned technology sets off an alarm in your car when you go over the speed limit and automatically reduces the power of the engine or even retards further depression of the accelerator pedal to ensure compliance with the limit. These measures are rationalised on the basis of safety and the governments moronic quest for net zero. In effect, Big Brother hand in hand with Extinction Rebellion will take over your vehicle.

This hateful legislation originates in the EU and the Department of Transport wants to keep us aligned. But we left the EU precisely to get away from this crap.

The car industry is split on it. Performance and luxury car manufacturers say it will destroy the market for them – which it will. What’s the point owning a McClaren when you can’t push it any more than a Ford Focus? However, the Society of Motoring Manufacturers and Traders, welcomed the measures and say that diverging from the EU regulations would be bad for the industry given the close ties between the two. This is bollox – the UK industry has survived for years with right hand cars diverging from the EU so why do we need speed limiters.

The proposed legislation also misses an important safety point. There are times when a driver needs speed to get out of a dangerous situation.

This is a serious and intrusive infringement of individual freedom and yet another manifestation of the Blob’s demonisation of drivers. Of course we should all drive safely and adhere to the speed limit (ahem!). But why can’t the Blob trust to the common sense of most drivers to drive safely and responsibly? The vast majority of motorists are safe and sensible drivers and, if not, there’s already an arsenal of penalties to deal with them ranging from speed awareness courses, fines and points through to disqualification.

The good news is that you can deactivate the system but you need to do it every time you start the car as it resets automatically. On principle I object to having this ghastly technology installed in any car I own and will seek to rip it out entirely. I’m lucky enough to own two performance cars in addition to the daily charabang – a V6 Morgan and a V8 Ferrari, and I’m going to be clinging onto them for the rest of my life, because they don’t have this shit technology installed. The best cars are just an engine, chassis, wheels and coachwork with no or minimum computerised interference between the driver and the engine. That’s real motoring.

Fuck off and leave my cars alone! Motorised cuntishness at its worst.

Daily Mail News Link

Nominated by: MMCM

Bargain Hunt [2]


Not so much a cunting as a conundrum.

Amongst the avalanche of shite that is downloaded onto my PC, this headline piqued my interest:-

”Bargain Hunt fans livid as team ‘that should’ve been disqualified’ make show history after breaking rules”

I have never seen the show. I assumed it was the one with that orange cunt Dickinson, but apparently not. Anyway, a couple seem to have won the show despite breaking the rules. I have looked at the write up and can’t for the life of me understand why this should be.
Perhaps the more erudite cunters amongst us can explain?

The Sun News Link

Nominated by: Cuntstable Cuntbubble