or as I like to call them are absolute fucking CUNTS.
Yes, lawyers—particularly criminal defence barristers and solicitors—are expected to face significant professional and financial disadvantages if jury trials are reduced, a move currently being proposed by super-intellect David Lammy in England and Wales to tackle court backlogs. The legal profession has expressed deep concern that removing the right to a jury trial for many offenses will diminish the need for specialist advocates, reduce income for criminal practitioners, and potentially drive new talent away from the field.
So, do they actually care about the thousands of scumbags being relentlessly hauled through the British courts? Of course not. It`s all about the vast amounts of lovely money they`ll lose out on.
The proposed shift to “judge-only” trials for some cases is expected to shorten proceedings, reducing the work available for defence lawyers. As jury trials are considered “long-form” work, fewer of them directly equates to less billable time, ie, fewer fees for barristers.
• Shrinking Legal Aid: Restrictions on jury trials, particularly when moving cases to magistrates’ courts, may shrink the pool of cases that qualify for legal aid, reducing the overall funding for criminal law firms.
• Reduced Demand for Trial Specialists: Criminal law practitioners are concerned that they will be “overlooked,” as the need for specialists skilled in presenting cases to a jury (who can interpret “real-world” context and emotions) will decrease in a system that focuses on more technical, judge-only hearings.
• Diminished Professional Appeal: The reduced potential for career progression, combined with lower funding for criminal work, is causing law students to reconsider specializing in criminal law, potentially creating a talent shortage.
• Shift in Work Type: While the volume of cases may remain high, they will be shifted to magistrates’ courts where the nature of the work is different, often offering lower remuneration and less opportunity for in-depth advocacy compared to the Crown Court.
Thousands of lawyers have signed letters opposing the restrictions, arguing that the changes are based on “little evidence” and are not the correct solution to the court crisis, which they attribute to underfunding and poor management rather than the use of juries. Lawyers contend that these reforms will not only affect their livelihood but also weaken public confidence in the justice system.
No shit. Really?
What a bunch of parasitic, greedy, unconscionable sociopaths.
🤮
Nominated by sņigger-sņigger.
Simple solution to the court backlog, deport every foreign criminal back to their home countries.
Shoot every darkiè and peaceful at the moment of their arrest.
Problem solved.
And hang a couple of dozen woke judges, just to keep the others in line..
44
Excellent Barry. Can we hang a few Liebour front benchers too? Just to even up the figures.
18
Yes, some if not most lawyers are fucking cunts, but I think that is because they are invariably defending foreign criminals.
If I were to be arrested for kicking the side of a migrant hotel, burning a copy of the Koran or refusing to call a geezer in a frock ‘she’, then I would want someone who could use every loophole to keep me out of nick.
Good morning.
12
Indeed TAC and good morning.
Lawyers are always cunts until you need one.
They’ve gotten me out of a couple of potentially very tricky situations in the past!
9
Morning Thomas.
Many year’s ago I was in court and facing an inevitable sentence.
I won’t go into detail, but the key bit of evidence was a document that had my signature on it.
My lawyer wasn’t interested if it was my signature or not and he was careful not to ask me directly.
He told me that the judge would ask me and he told me to say, word for word, “Looking at that, I can say that is not my signature”.
In court, when the evidence was presented I was given the document to examine and asked the question.
I gave my answer as instructed.
I was eventually found not guilty.
The prosecution lawyer came over to my lawyer after the trial and said that I should be charged with perjury.
My lawyer told him that he should have listened more closely to what I said.
That’s the type of shyster that you need.
10
Fascinating tale there Artful. I doubt your lawyer was uninterested whether or not it was your signature on the document but he obviously intended to remain disinterested. In the end your lawyer nailed it with his superior command of the language relative to the members of the jury. Had the judge been on the ball he would have required you to give an unambiguous answer.
10
The whole system seems to be bent. If I smashed up an office window in town, I’m pretty sure I would end up in front of a magistrate, not a jury. When the loony groups like Just Stop Oil or one of their offshoots do it, they get a jury trial and then somehow the jury manages to let them off! Lawyers are a closed shop bunch charging outrageous fees, so them losing out would be a silver lining on this bad decision to remove jury trials.
10
In the case of the Hamas supporting scum who shattered the WPC’s back with a sledgehammer while smashing up Elbit systems, the jury found there wasn’t enough evidence to prosecute.
Apart from the badycam footage from two or more coppers.
in this case, it was fairly obvious the jury had been threatened by the Jihadi cock sucking cunts from Palestine action.
There will be a retrial and I hope one where there is no jury to be got at.
9
Because you are not part of a far left organisation bankrolled by 4×2 billionaires and other such scum.
5
Advocati scelerati quia semper Latine loquuntur.
3
That’s wrong. Try this:
Advocati scelerati ‘cunts’ quia semper Latine loquuntur.
4
Good one Geordie. It was ever so. As the bard wrote; “First thing we do, we kill all the lawyers!”
6
What’s this?
Some sort of Bad Egg is upsetting the legal Gravy Train?
Please assume the legal system and the political system are part of the same cesspit.
A cesspit of cunts.
Oven.
Good morning.
7
Anthony Blair and Rodney Starmer were both lawyers. Both ultimate exponents of cuntitude and deceit.
Yet, I fear that, in a country where the police are little more than the enforcement arm of the far left establishment and judges are encouraged to go easy on certain ethnic groups and throw the book at ‘far right’ white people, indigenous folk probably need lawyers more than ever.
Lammy’s plan isn’t just about saving time and money, it removes the vagaries of jury decisions, which means that a well briefed and lent on judge can dish out the justice that the government require to meet their agenda.
Sometimes we have to be very careful about what we wish for.
14
On the other hand, juries can be dangerously biased if your trial ends up being in the wrong location. Works in people’s favour sometimes, like if they are an East End gangster or thief who gets tried by their peers at Snaresbrook Crown Court. But supposing you’re a white man in some way tarred with the accusation of “racism” or some such and find your jury trial is to take place in Brixton…? Do you want your freedom to hang on the judgement of 12 locals, who have the combined IQ of a boiled potato and hate you by default?
10
Fair point, TM.
And there was me thinking that nobbled juries were something you only saw on the Sweeney.
And there’s always some mouthy, pushy, obnoxious lefty wanker in a jury who try’s to force a decision based on their own political bias.
6
Had to laugh at the ‘weaken public confidence in the justice system’ line 🤣
Too fucking late! The whole system is a total joke nowadays, dancing to the tune of our inept politicians. British justice is only any good at keeping illegals in the country, certainly no use at getting rid of the cunts, though it springs to the fore when it comes to hammering 2Tier’s imaginary ‘Far Right’ thugs.
Biased, woke & hamstrung. Pile of shit.
13
The closest I’ve ever been to any of these shenanigans, was when my name had been pulled out of the hat for jury selection. I made up some sob story about not being eligible and they fell for it.
7
Not exactly off-topic…
Here we see the usual rampaging savages. If they are not looting, they are killing. They are completely and utterly useless. I will venture to say that the presence of such people in our country has brought precisely zero benefit. Why we have had to turn our own cities into facsimiles of dangerous hellscapes like Chicago is beyond me. But now the genie is well and truly out of the bottle and cannot easily be put back. Most people, even members of the elite who are nominally in charge, are seemingly incapable of even uttering what the problem is. It is unthinkable to them. So how can it be solved?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15717131/Musician-agony-son-camera-Primrose-Hill-stabbing.html
The people running the successful nations of Rhodesia and South Africa back in the 1970s saw the matter clearly. They were attacked by all and sundry, and driven to abandon what was rightfully theirs, against their own interests, those of all the natives who benefitted, and the rest of the world. The exact same ignorance and stupidity is now on display every week in our own country.
11
All part of living in a big black city.
Welcome to the jungle. 🦧🦍🐒
Good morning.
8
If you live with rats don’t be surprised if you become a sewer. I obviously don’t know anything about this kid but if you are living in a £1m flat and have all these opportunities to do almost anything you like with your life why the fuck are you hanging around with the dregs of society and producing drill rap videos for these savages?
9
Yes, it would seem that the safest bet is to adopt our own individual policy of Apartheid and ensure those nearest and dearest to us do same. The greatest extent possible. This is certainly how I go about life. Beyond that, it’s a case of hoping your young daughter’s dance class, the local picnic spot, shopping centres, hotels and train stations are sufficiently protected by armed guards who are authorised to deploy lethal force. This last part is where we are vulnerable.
10
I wouldn’t have my family living in a place awash with stabby pavement apes with the IQ of a coat hanger.
Greater London is utterly infested with all species of simians. Best to sell up and live out in the country, far away from places like Primrose Hill, where stabby apes are always looking for someone who may have ‘dissed’ them that are ripe for a bit of zombie knife action.
12
It is my life’s ambition to slip, fall over and do myself an injury in the office of a firm of lawyers specialising in personal injury claims.
Then to sue the fucking parasitic cunts for everything they’ve got.
10
When reform are in government they say the will stop all visas from countries that ask for reparations I wonder if they will deport those already here calling for reparations
https://news.sky.com/video/square-david-lammy-001-mp4-11338321
5
Why are we allowing any people from those countries to come here in the first place? We need them like a fish needs a bike. Let’s just train our own young people to fill the roles that are needed. And any universities that are depending on these people for fee income should be shut down. Universities should be for the sole purpose of educating our people in necessary skills, not providing a form of lucrative tourism and path to immigration for Africans.
This is what Reform should be proposing. Their idea simply means saying to certain countries “stop asking for reparations”. That is far from being the problem here.
7
My own lawyer, Mister Flywheel, of Messrs Flywheel, Shyster and Flywheel, informs me that trail without jury is a much better system. Brown envelopes will be fully tax deductible, apparently. The same system works very well in Zimbabwe – alongside state torture. The erudite Lammy Henry has clearly done his homework.
Good morning, everyone.
8
Private Eye came up with a stonking name for a legal firm “Sue, Grabbit and Run.
5
I understand Geordie Twatt’s legal representatives are Haddaway & Shite.
4
Love it!!!
1
A simple solution to:
Solicitors.
Barrister.
Illegal dinghy rats.
Prison overcrowding.
House of commons
House of lords.
Royalty
Peacefuls
Windrush offspring ..
https://youtu.be/O8nc0rlCArM?si=tld771y732VY_tfv
6
A water cooled Vickers machine gun was operated for seven days continuously. Being topped up with water and bullets. You might get rid of all the cunts that need sorting out.
5
Ma Deuce, lovely. May I venture a Gau Avenger – Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrap – Problem solved.
5
Right on, those 30mm rounds awesome as many a peaceful will tell you via ouija board or tarot cards
6
Cheer up everyone….
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/09/four-migrants-drown-in-channel/
8
Oh dear what a shame…4 less dinghy rats to fleece the UK taxpayers..☠️
Let’s hope thousands more meet the same fate..☠️
10
I notice the frog cunts called the dinghy they were riding a ‘water taxi’.
That’s a good insight in to the fucking snail-chomping cunts attitude to this illegal activity, the utter twats.
7
This backlog could probably be solved if courts did a proper day..
I was in a coroners jury last year.
Eight days it was scheduled for.
It was wrapped up in six days.
Out of those six days i reckon we were in court for maybe 30 hours.
One day we went home at 1.00.
And a couple of days we didn’t start till 11.
Ps it was the dirty foreign medical staff that were to blame..
6
A working day spent mixing with Criminals and sat on your arse for long periods for large reward?
Lawyers are no different to politicians.
Both have only a passing relationship with the truth.
Kier Starmer is both.
Lawyer an political cunt.
Hes Bi.
6
I once represented myself at a industrial tribunal.
I couldnt afford legal representation.
My boss had been stealing my tax, national insurance contributions etc.
It was full on.
“All rise for the judge”
In all honesty I was out of my depth.
Im someone who does manual labour not a fuckin bookworm.
So decided, just tell the truth.
The truth will set you free.
The judge (a bird) took pity on me.
The boss hadnt shown up which narked her,
Maybe she was on the blob?
Dunno,
But she gave me some advice which she wasnt really meant to do.
Probably fancied me😁
Anyway, the boss had to pay everything back and settled out of court with me.
Kerching👍
7
Rumpole of the Gravy.
8
Rump hole, 😁
3
O/T, Donald don’t threaten. Just blow the cunts up..🔥
https://www.gbnews.com/news/world/donald-trump-us-forces-remain-middle-east-agreement-iran
5
Quite agree Doc. He’s been giving it large with his gob about it long enough, so now’s the time for the B1Bs & B52s to do the talking.
6
https://www.theodorerooseveltcenter.org/quote/speak-softly-and-carry-a-big-stick-you-will-go-far-if-a-man-continually-blusters-if-he-lacks-civility-a-big-stick-will-not-save-him-from-trouble-and-neither-will-speaking-softly-avail-i/
6
We know you read our posts Donald..!
5
Court backlogs? Didnt 2000ad suggest a solution to this in the form of Judge Dredd?
1