These days I have only a mild passing interest in football and try to avoid news in general. However, I clicked onto the Telegraph Football webpage to see what’s going on. There was a bit about Man Utd fans wanting a no confidence vote in Sir Jim Radcliffe. OK. Man City to pay £60M release clause to sign Semenyo. OK. Some news about the starting lineups for the Woolwich Nomads vs. Murdering Scum Scousers. Fair enough.
But what’s this? Mini headline reads, “Coote avoids prison after child sex offence conviction”. That’s not football news. The fact Coote used to be a Premier League referee is irrelevant. I don’t want to be exposed to stories about sex pests. That shit should be on the main news section, not the football section.
Another mini-headline, “Gabby Logan replaced during Match of the Day following death of father Terry Yorath”. Terry Yorath (proper footballer) passing away is football news related. I get that part. His gargoyle daughter leaving the set of some has been BBC shit show is not news. Why do we need to know she left the set to deal with a death in the family? We don’t. Again, it’s not football news, FFS.
This kind of shit goes on all the time. On the BBC Football webpage there’ll often be references to absolute nobodies but related to a high profile club. Bit confusing. Oh wait, it’s about women’s football not proper football. Now the BBC in their infinite wisdom have these tabs/sections on their Football webpage:
– Scores & Fixtures
– Tables
– Gossip
– Transfers
– Top Scorers
– Women
– European
– All Teams
– League & Cups
– Quizzes
Now if some cunt reporter at the BBC wants to write up some crap about some nobody tart who plays for a woman’s team, take a wild fucking guess which section that “story” should be in.
Is it so unreasonable to have football news on the Football page, cricket news on the Cricket page, rugby news on the Rugby page and so on? And have the unrelated crap on the main news page where it’s more easily avoided?
Nominated by : Immigration Yank
To be as suitably off-topic as the news, can I just say that lanyard-wearing women holding up bakery queues by ordering ridiculous coffees that take 10 minutes to make are complete and utter fucking battered and smegma’d cunts.
1
The BBC Sport website is a shower of lazy journalism.
Latest news and gossip lifted from the newspapers, sycophantic interviews, and the usual unrelated bollocks mentioned in the nom.
Then there’s the favouritism.
For a few years now, the golden boy of choice is Arsenals Saka who, we’re led to believe, makes George Best look like an amateur.
And there are hints of this in the small details.
Arsenal get a result. Cue headline photo of a beaming Saka, even if he contributed little in reality.
Arsenal lose or draw. Cue a photo of a glum looking Declan Rice.
Because only white British players can represent losers. Right?
If the Sun can give a more balanced view than the BBC, there’s something very seriously wrong.
0
“It’s a great big melting pot” as some annoying cunt once sang.
They just can’t help themselves,some “lifestyle” editor cobbles together the pap,usually including a picture of a wholly unrelated wōg.
Cunts.
Good morning.
0
The quality of journalism is unbelievably poor. I’m utterly convinced that 90% of it is written by either the office cat, or 15 year olds on work experience.
The inability to recognise that a story about Coote belonged in the main news section, or Gabby what’s her face in entertainment convinces me. I’ll bet they have toddlers practicing the alphabet by doing the filing.
Half the time grammar and spellings are that of a semi-literate, spellcheck is useless if you have the ability of an orangutan.
1
Man City wanker Pep Guardiola thinking anyone gives two lumps of cold rat shit of what he thinks about Gaza, Ukraine, Sudan or ICE.
0
I know a bloke who works on the BBC Sport website as part of the editorial team.
When he told me what his job was, I quipped, ‘Oh. They actually edit it do they?’
To say he wasn’t impressed is an understatement.
0