The BBC’s (145) Executive Complaints Committee

The BBC’s Executive Complaints Committee (hilarious in its own right) has rebuked newsreader Martine Croxall for going “off script” during an interview about heatwaves affecting,amongst others, pregnant “people”..

“The presenter said: “Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, says that the aged, pregnant people … women … and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.”

The ECU said it considered Croxall’s facial expression laid it open to the interpretation that it “indicated a particular viewpoint in the controversies currently surrounding trans ideology.”

This just a day or two after the Daily Telegraph unveiled irrefutable evidence Panorama doctored a speech by President Trump to make it appear that he incited rioting.

A sick joke.

An untouchable Hard Left Cartel of Quisling Cunts.

bbcnews

Nominated by Unkle Terry.

22 thoughts on “The BBC’s (145) Executive Complaints Committee

  1. It remains a mystery to me how trannies have reached the top of the tree.

    But if you have read Suetonius, you know that the ruling class have always been sexual deviants.

  2. The BBC seems to be unsure as to whether or not a man can get pregnant.

    Could CV-embellisher and font of all knowledge Marianna please Verify one way or the other?

  3. It seems that the very same BBC trans lobby which was mentioned and criticised in Prescott’s report still has influence.
    The boss should bang some heads together.
    But that begs another question.
    Who is the boss?
    It seems that the lack of action against the lobbyists stems from a lack of real power.
    If the director general doesn’t feel empowered enough to act, who’s next up the tree?
    Samir Shah, the park key chairman?
    His job is about as safe as Rodney’s.
    Which leaves?
    Fucked if I know, and neither do they.
    Might as well just carry on being unaccountable then.
    Cunts!

    • I think it’s because they have so many executive deputy editors in chief on £300,000 a yr they can’t remember who does what.

      Circus Freak Panto of Cunts.

      Good morning.

  4. ‘Martine Croxall Rolls eyes I mean smarmy bigot. Not surprised the BBC doubled down good job ofcom seem less then pleased’ ….

    …^ thanks,, random Redditor cunt. The general tone from the cunt brigade, I see, is that she’s trying to ‘control the narrative’ and – get this! – “force her opinion on others”

    Anyone else?

    ‘Croxall’s interjection here is a clear and obvious example of bigotry and transphobia and an attempt to erase transmen’s, intersex people’s and non binary people’s roles in the study and in pregnancy in general’

    Ha ha… it’s like reading the bizarro-isac.

    One more.

    ‘By changing pregnant people to women she somehow manages to erase trans men, imply that women are not people, and that lastly also imply you can only be a woman if you have a working womb. All in one miserable breath’.

    Super. That middle one of the three there is from a ‘sample letter’ one outraged cunt wrote & posted telling other outraged cunts to copy & paste it and send it to every avenue of complaint possible … “to help cut-off the greasy filth of her – and her types – hate”.

    Just a little look over the fence, all of the above, there.

    Carry on, you greasy filth … 😄

  5. I have the great pleasure of not paying the tv licence rip off. I, therefore, do not watch any BBC rubbish, ITV, 4, 5, whatever. They can stick their biased crap where it belongs, up their chuff.

  6. I understand one of these trans mutants is featuring on BBC’s Strictly. Should instead be named Strictly Freakshow.

    One day the show will be Strictly for the reserve of trannies, peedoes, gaylords, cucks and incels. No heteros allowed by Strict order of the hard left BBC.

    And that’s just the presenters…

  7. Croxall’s expression ‘indicated a particular viewpoint’ did it?

    As if the Beeb hasn’t been indicating a particular viewpoint on the trans issue for years!

    What a bunch of cunts.

    Morning all.

  8. Didn’t this nonsense start with the NHS, changing some of their guidance notes on pregnancy to read pregnant people rather that women, I could be wrong, all this nonsense just merges into on big pile of shite.

    All these organisations who trip over themselves to be ‘inclusive’ aren’t helping anyone and now the Supreme Court have decided that under the equalities act sex means biological sex the diversity managers are having breakdowns 😂

    DEI should have been banned before it began, it has been a complete disaster.

  9. It is decisions like this, made by the “Executive Committee” the top brains remember, that undermines any last vestige or remaining faith in BBC objectivity. It simply confirms their role as out of touch clowns.
    Owning and controlling the language does not mean you also control the narrative, or what the common people think.
    Like many I grew up regarding the BBC to be one of the finest institutions World wide; alas no longer
    Mornin all.
    Ps I can only assume it is a vernal attitude and the ludicrous wages paid that prevents the other “Readers” rising up in revolt/ support.

  10. Why don’t the beeb let bygones be bygones. They’ve let a lot slip with Nancy Boys and Fuzzy-Wuzzies, plus much worse, besides the silliness of the sexes. Now let everybody watch your channels for free, like I’ve experienced all of my life and nothing else will be said.

Leave a Reply to Edward Wallace Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *