I recently came across this article about the behaviour of fruit flies.
The scientists say that mr fruit fly, who has a skin full of alcohol is more likely to score with mrs fruit fly. Whilst the fruit fly who sticks to drinking water is less attractive.
Might it be that the fruit fly who sticks to water, is a boring, ugly cunt who mrs fruit fly would rather avoid ?
Especially if she’s a good time fruit fly, just out for a fuck. A bit like Angie Rayner, but with wings and a brain.
And then the scientist says ” We don’t think flies drink alcohol because they are depressed ” What does a depressed fruit fly do ?
Even if the fruit fly is depressed what business is that of the scientist ?
If the fruit fly wants to go down to his local, get absolutely wrecked, and then become belligerent with other fruit flies who don’t understand him, or sit in his bedroom and start maudlin. I say good of him.
Keep the scientists guessing.
Even if he is feeling a bit down in the mouth, it’s fuck all to do with scientists with nothing better to do.
If it is true what scientists say, why aren’t more women like fruit flies ?
A bit like beer goggles but in reverse, the more I drink the more women want to rummage about in my Y fronts.
Scientists stick it to what you can prove.
PS what scientists know about fruit flies is irrelevant to me, I squash the cunts with a rolled up newspaper.
Nominated by The cunt man of Alcatraz.
It proves one thing that fat tarts who stink of burgers and chips, should eat more fruit.
16
Well Angie’s burger stinks & she likes plenty of fruit.
21
Wes Streeting is a fruit.
3
Do these fruit flies live in England?
And have they been drinking since July?
16
British fruitflies🇬🇧
Best fruitflies in the world
9
I bet they steer well clear of them ragheads. With no booze on offer, & the possibily of them ending up as a fly burger!
7
And originally when the earth etc. were created overnight six thousand years ago, giraffe’s eggs used to be made from wood so they wouldn’t break when they laid them…
15
Those same dumb scientists, with fuck all better to do, are still trying to work out just how many of them joined end to end it would take to reach the moon.
14
That’s a 60 second calculation, lord … no grants in stuff that a cunt with a calculator could knock-out, prove or disprove, whilst taking their morning shit, … so fruit flies and similar bullshit it is, generally…
11
1 Web ask( the distance) 2 calculations.l(1000/1.7, answer x aforementioned distance).
30 seconds.
(226,119,456 dumb scientists, give or take).
Had barely even dropped me kecks! 😋
5
There is also the fact that each month, there is a variation in distance of around 25,000 miles, between the earth & the moon, that is an awful lot of fruit flies.
3
Speaking of knobheads who don’t know what the fuck they’re doing, here’s Professor Fuckwit spunking our money to reflect solar energy away from the Earth and so reduce global warming. At the same time Psycho Ed is covering the countryside with Chinese crap to harness solar energy.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c5ygydeqq08o
It seems that the dickheads who rule us can’t spot the contradiction.
Psycho Ed Miligoon folks – doing for our energy security what the atomic bomb did for Hiroshima.
17
I can remember studying fruit flies at school but I can’t remember why, nice to know they are still relevant today.
I think it may have been something to do with the life cycle but I had no idea they went on the lash and pulled lady Tootie Fruities.
10
Climate zealots ‘the science is settled’, well that’s good, so we don’t need them any longer or the zealots.
10
On a sort of related subject “scientists” are baffled by a shit tonne of Antarctic ice forming. Maybe it’s climate change? I’m sure Millicunt will tax us for it.
https://thedebrief.org/anomalous-discovery-in-antarctica-has-left-climate-scientists-scratching-their-heads/
8
Ooh dear. That’ll put a few twats out of a cushy job if the trend continues.
12
What gets me is the way that a couple of years where the data are going the wrong way for the climate change lobby is dismissed as insignificant as shown later in that article. However if we have a couple of weeks sunny weather with no rain that’s all the proof they need that climate change is moving on apace, the world is going to hell in a hand basket and it’s all our fault. We must give up our cars and move into a yurt today. Well fuck ’em say I.
8
Russell’s Teapot. One of my favourite analogies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot
13
Wish Hawkie hadn’t used a yankie voice when alive. No wander he wasn’t believed.
5
Wonder, silly twat.
2
Wasn’t believed Sammy? You mean by morons who believe in gods?
3
This excellent research was funded by the Max Planck Institute,which in turn receives its funding from the German state and regional governments.
And there was me thinking the Jerries had spent up on Afghans,traffic bollards and tanks that need blowing up in the Ukraine.
Mind you,with the number of dirty,smelly foreign cunts infesting the place there would be no trouble catching the flies,which no doubt boffins will establish have trebled in numbers since Merkel opened the floodgates to human garbage in 2015..
No doubt Mengele is laughing his head off in Hell.
Tefal Oven.
13
Is a quark is as thick as 2 short Plancks?
⚛️
10
Did you know Sam that this is where Volkswagen got the inspiration for the name for their city car? The new one, the Down is due to be announced any day now. Safe bet it will be followed by the Charm, the Strange…..
2
E = mc³.
Eat that, Einstein.
🍄
8
You sooties just have to go one better, don’t you?
8
You can`t argue with brutal scientific facts, Geordie…
“To the observer, time flows faster or slower depending on which side of the toilet door you are.”
(Sambert Beaustein, 2023, ibid.)
🚽🚻
11
That is an absolute fact. Especially when touching cloth.
0
Fruit flies getting hammered so what. If I was kept in a jar in a lab I’d get pissed big time as well. Looks like which way to waste our money. Cover Lincolnshire with solar panels ( can’t see that.happening due to every inch of space covered with bird mincers, the plan) really big space mirror in orbit reflecting the Sun bit startrek but lots of cunty jobs and ooodles of money.
4
Fruit flies cant take their drink.
Oh they may come over all Georgie Best at first,
But when it comes to their round theyre asleep in the bogs after spewing up.
Besides they like fruit drinks.
Bacardi breezers, stuff that birds drink.
Little pisspots should be barred.
7
Wasps are cunts with the booze too. One sniff of the barmaid’s apron and they’re all ‘wanna fight?’
WAY overestimate how much they can handle, they do. You leave your pint for a couple of minutes in a beer garden, the cunts think they’re gonna drink the whole thing on you.
Invariably you come back and find the cunt Matthew Perrying it in yer ale…
6
Theres a pub in York, forget which,
But it has a lovely beer garden.
And thousands of wasps who get pissed and belligerent.
You go to sip your pint theyll be two on the glass.
The little bastards are everywhere.
Youd be Fucked if you were allergic.
And for every pint you buy theyll drink a third of it.
Then offer you out
Chat your missus up
4
Next thing one of the little stripey cunts has stuffed a tenner in the jukebox, and you’re stuck listening to fucking Sting for the next twenty songs…
4
Waspi women are known to have an attitude.
3
Or making assumptions that people don’t like.!
“Richard Lynn – Wikipedia” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynn
4
The one I remember is that there are 10,000 stars out there for each grain of sand on earth.
You can say its 1000 or 500.
Why not 329?
And besides surely there is not even a rough estimate for all the grains of sand on Earth to begin with?
7
Best eye-opener you’ll see as far as quantifying astronomical quantities is behind the YT link below.
It’s still incomprehensible to the human brain (at best we can understand a *description* of numbers so large) but still. If even 1 cunter likes it, why not?
The ‘anthropocene is a joke’ link was more popular than I thought it would be in topic ‘climate whiplash’ a couple of months back.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7J_Ugp8ZB4E&pp=ygUXcG91cmVkIGFsbCB0aGUgZ2FsYXhpZXM%3D
Bike sheds if anyone calls me a nerd.
4
(start, up to 3:40 is the meat of it, in galaxies. Beyond that (stars) .. 🤯)
1
Scientists shouldn’t make assumptions. There’s fuck all scientific about assuming an outcome.
Therefore, if they can’t reach an inarguable conclusion, they aren’t very good at science in the first place.
And I’m sick to fucking death of hearing from ‘experts’.
If two ‘experts’ have two differing opinions on a given subject, only one can be right.
Which means only one of them is really an expert and the other is a fucking chancer.
We need to go back to real science like the old days.
Not this shit where the find a conclusion and work back from that.
7
That has always bent my head.
When scientific types and them say that dogs see in black and white, or cats see in night vision.
How can they know, if they aren’t a dog or a cat?
8
Because dogs only watch films before colour film.
Dogs know who Harold Lloyd is
But no clue who Nicholas Cage is.
5
And they love the comedy of ronnie barker.
5
And Robert wagner
1
And Basil rathbone.
2
And Rufus Hound
1
I’ve got this horrible feeling that they ( the scientists) cut off the heads of a dog and cat, and somehow wired them up, while they were preserved in a bell jar, and managed to view the world through their eyes!
Or is that a bit Stephen King?
2
Sounds more like Clive barker JP..
2
It is a common misconception that cats and dogs can only see in black and white.
Scientists have proven this to be a myth.
In all animals, including humans, the perception of colour is determined by the presence of cells in the eye called cone photoreceptors. Cats and dogs have two kinds of cones, which are sensitive to blue and green light. This means they have a useful level of colour vision. The level of colour vision in other animals depends on the presence and types of the cones.
To see in full colour as we experience it, humans use three cones: red, blue and green. However cats and dogs only have blue and green cones. This means they have a much more limited perception of colour, which is akin to colour blindness in humans. As cats and dogs are not sensitive to red light, they have difficulty distinguishing some colours. For example, behavioural tests in dogs suggest that they can distinguish red from blue, but often confuse red and green. Similarly, they often perceive green as grey.
Cats and dogs have evolved to be superbly designed for night-time hunting. Their eyes have a high density of rods, which are the cells that are sensitive to dim light. This means they can see normally with as little as 15% of light that humans would need. Also, their pupils function much as the aperture for a camera does, dilating significantly when they need to take in extra light. Cats in particular have exceptionally large pupils for their body size and outstanding night-time vision. However it’s a myth that cats and dogs can see in the pitch dark. Like all animals, some light is required for the eye to function properly.
The only animal that has been confirmed to see only in black and white is the Skate fish. This is because they have no cones in their eyes.
11
That’s fascinating. Thank you for a very educational, but concise explanation, S-cB.
I had a cat, could deffo see white.
She’d watch golf on the TV, and look behind the TV for the ball!
4
In my life ive been in situations where its shrewd judgement to call in someone who is a specialist in his work.
You need a plumber
You need a electrician
Your best getting in a builder
You need a tree surgeon
All people who are trained and good at what they do.
Ive never heard
“your best getting in a scientist”
“ooo i wouldnt touch it till id spoken to a scientist”
Never.
Why? Because theyre useless speccy egghead cunts.
Most of em just wing it,
The others are trying to bring corpses back to life in castles
Or fuckin about with mouldy bread.
I dont trust em 👀
If you DO need one.
Phone round.
Get ten quotes.
7
The very top scientists generally have incredibly high IQs, they’re brilliant in their own sphere, but completely useless at doing anything simple and practical.
Take that Stephen Hawking for example. Couldn’t even make a cup of tea.
I think he might have been on the spectrum.
7
😄😄😄😄😄
Cheers, Geordie.
4
I think Stevie Hawkwind was a fraud.
Hed come out with something sounding profound,
Everyone would stroke their chin
“ooo hes a genius
1
But he never proved his theories.
Might of been bollocks?
After all he was a spastic.
Cant just take his word for it.
He was basically a draft excluder with a inbuilt calculator.
4
Mind you, not all scientists are impractical.
As our esteemed Foreign Secretary pointed out, famous scientist Marie Antoinette not only won the Nobel Prize for Physics but also found time to be Queen of France and donate her head to Medical Science.
3
I am a pretty smart cunt, got loads of exam certificates…
I am intrigued with “dark matter” and “dark energy”, 95% of the universe is supposedly full of this stuff.
They cannot see or detect it.
Just imbibed a can of 1664, it disappeared into a black hole.
8
Your like me Harry,
You hide it well…
😁
3
I’ve made 2 cans disappear.
Naturally I’m shortly expecting a grant from Bill Gates.
The Cunt.
2
1664, the lager previously known as Kronenbourg, is still a pretty decent brew, but nowhere near as good as it was a year or two ago when they altered the recipe and reduced the alcohol content from 5% to 4.6%, the cunts.
Anyway, time for another.
4
Ironically the same year SKB as the Royal Marines were formed. Unfortunately, there was no other connection.
2
Sorry, that’s cake with a “K”
0
Sometimes, dear Admin, I wish I could just post a link, with a WTF label, because, honestly, sometimes the damned thing speaks for itself!
So how about a WTF, like the coronovirus one?
1
How about this.
You were stranded on a desert island whod you want to be stranded with?
Me? Or stevie Hawkwind?
Im a grafter,
Id help construct a shelter,
Get a fire going
Find drinking water
Catch fish
Find coconuts
Id pull my weight.
Stevie would be fucked soon as got there.
Wheelchair stuck in the sand.
Wouldnt help you!
Hed sit there pulling that bulldog face and expecting you to spoon feed him.
Even Wilson the football did more than he would.
I was stranded with him hed be fishbait.
Fuck. That.
1
Yes, but he’d have a theory for everything.
Beat that.
1
Id just tip him out of his wheelchair and let the seagulls peck him to death on the sand.
0
A bit of an off the wall nom, very amusing, the kind I love.Nice one Cuntman.
I must say that quote from Hawking up top has always intrigued me.
‘The laws of physics can explain the universe without the need for a creator’. Maybe, maybe not. As I understand it, we don’t even really know what the fundamental laws of physics actually are.
I’ve often heard people argue that if there’s a God, where did God come from? Did Hawking ever say where he thought the ‘the laws of physics’ come from?
3
You asked, so I’ll stick my head above the parapet and answer.
The revelation the blurb refers to not only removed the need for any creator – spatiotemporal, omnipotent or otherwise, .. but actually precluded one altogether, based on proven laws of physics imprinted into the universe. Time-dilation under extreme circumstances being the crux here, specifically. Experimentally measured/observed utilising atomic clocks on aircraft, submarines, tall buildings, spacecraft and in particle decay measurements at CERN.
Publications watered it down with ifs and maybes so as not to upset the believers in the various different creators of lore, it would seem.
I have the full original statement about same in front of me on my laptop as I’m typing this, and fuck me ; even that is 80% tip-toeing around the fact that in a basically simple way (once you fathom gravity and time to some extent more than just ‘Oh yeah, I’ve heard of them’) .. he did it! Checkmate on the god character(s), so to speak.
Where those laws got their values, as you pondered, fall under anthropic principle in that case. Maybe because of mere random chance, maybe because a number of differently-valued sterile nearly-ran scenarios over an obscenely incomprehensible amount of time eventually filtered down to a hospitable go-around in which we find ourselves asking such, .. with the caveat that for the vast, vast majority of it’s existence, this indifferent universe will NOT be conducive to biological life anyways.
It doesn’t matter how thoroughly someone with the relevant insight to the maths and equations lays it out, though, .. a believer in the other business will always be ready to ignore same and chime-in with an ill-informed contradictory ‘yeah, but…’
I’ve come to my conclusions after doing a ton of homework on the matter. I find contrarian opinion-holders have, by comparison, done basically none.
2
Nobody believes that I’m God.
I don’t know why because I’m quite plausible.
Nobody knows where I come from, somebody saw me come out the sky so I had to kill him because he might have told everybody else that I was God.
I didn’t use a parachute neither.
I’ve even got my hands and feet still with holes in them.
That’s why I always wear gloves, so you can’t see where them nails went through, get me!
When I was last down here we used to till the fields and I used to walk on the water and stuff like that for a living, yes I did.
I had twelve friends – I used to go to their dinners.
I went to Simon’s house once and his wife was there and she let me feel her jugs…
Btw, that new Pope Leo is a fucking con man.
FACT!
Scientifically proven the world over.
Don’t let anyone tell you other.
His real name is Bobby.
Bigger charlatan than that Yaxley Lemon fella.
Fuck them.
3
Re. your post last night Cuntemall; people who call you a nerd mean it as an insult. You should take it as a compliment.
2
Thanks Arfur. Been a long time bulletproof on that score, don’t worry.
Irony IS ; in a scenario like that (colloquially: jock vs. nerd), both parties know which one is more the cunt, deep down.
It’s like that old saying :
a viginmilliatillion birds in the hand is worth five-hundred billion novemdecmillianongensexnonagintillion in the bush.
1