Non-stories Getting Coverage

The news is no longer dependable in any real meaning. Any ‘big’ stories are presented with a biased slant, depending on the internal politics of the outlet.. On the same point, for example, one crowd will call a certain group of people taken and held against their will ‘hostages’, while another will call them ‘captives’. That’s subtle, but enough to be missed by swathes of the unthinking-for-themselves. But the point of view is still promoted. ‘Murdered by’ and ‘killed by’ another 2 different ways to describe the ending of a life(s), as a second example.
Vehicles purposely driven in to crowds(jesus what a sentence) describers (I’m loathe to call these cunts journalists)get that one wrong all the time.

And if there’s a story too big to be ‘spun’, then it will remain unreported altogether. Effnick outrages particularly (crime, antisocial creepy behaviour en masse etc.) The omission of any detail if a perpetrator is of a certain subset to a point of ridiculousness (describing the colour of a rapist-on-the-run’s sweatshirt but not if he’s black, if he is black). Describing a rapist or murderers skin colour is not racism, it’s simply a fact.

Even the fucking filler – like this link below – has a slant to it. A non-story if there ever was one, .. it’s pure ‘pro’ the absolute tool that it’s about – who should have been told to fuck off with it, when he decided to call it in and make a deal out of it for self-promotional reasons/attention-neediness. But instead someone took the time to type it up & put it out to the world like it matters. A ‘Stop Press’ situation it certainly ain’t.

There was a car-into-crowd occurrence yesterday, as I type this, eleven dead .. but the news feed all day didn’t proffer that to me once. THIS 9 month old tat came up instead just now (prompting the nom).

I didn’t cunt the bbc specifically, because this ‘reporting’ of bullshit is widespread across the board. All the time now. But this one is particularly low-bar. With pathetic posed-for pictures for good measure. Have these type of people no shame whatsoever?

C-U-N-T-S, everyone involved.

bbcnews

Nominated by Cuntemall.

79 thoughts on “Non-stories Getting Coverage

  1. A non story for most. But that cunt Haaland bottling a cup final penalty.

    As expected, the TV apologists are making excuses.

    ‘But… But maybe it was too much for him.’

    Too much? He is paid fucking hundreds of thousands of pounds a week.
    I once saw Eric Cantona nervelessly put away two penaties in the 1994 FA Cup Final. Also, can anyone imagine Francis Lee chickening out of taking a pen?

    Haaland is a bum and a great big girl.

    All very amusing though.🤣

    • A wee bit more on the cup final.

      Managers adopting the Zelensky look. Don’t any of these foreign cunts wear a suit\?

      The Ciddy team.with loads of shirt numbers in the 70s. And French ‘crossed’ 70s at that. The twats.

      And finally, United should get that Palace goalie. And fuck off the Black Banana.

      • I always thought Henderson had potential. Why did uni-ted let him go ?

  2. I want to know why that colostomy bag wearing, Op Yew Tree dodging, k*ddie f*sling cunt of all cunts Cliff Richard isn’t being reported in? The sneaky bastard is bound to be up to some nefariousness, you can count on it!! Fucking BBC!!

    • He was Foggy.]
      The BBC – of all people – actually tried it, with help from the Plod.

      But, because of the massive coverage it got and how it backfired, Clifford is now all but untouchable.

      Even if he was outed Schofield style, the MSM and other celebrity cunts would label him as ‘brave’.

  3. What I hate is how the BBC (especially) turn a major crime into a minor story.

    Manchester Arena attack? Oh, it was a ‘British citizen’.

    Another terror atrocity? A man of Norwegian origin.

    The barbaric Southport incident? Just a normal bloke from Cardiff.

    When they know full well they are all migrants or children of migrants.

  4. And, they keep coming.
    From the Beeb (where else?)

    ‘Ex-Little Mix ‘star’ (guffaw🤣) gives birth to twins.’

    This is news? Seriously?!

    In the 60s, 70s or 80s, this ‘news’ would have got a tiny column at the side of the Page 3 Girl.

    • I’ll see your household name(guffaw again!) and her shitting out a new sprog on this overpopulated planet, .. and raise you a pair of plain-as-fuck looking twin sisters in their 30’s, both doing the hand under the pregnant belly thing (🤮) looking all smug about it, under a headline ‘Pregnant twin sisters both due at the same time’. Quarter page for the picture of the the 2 cunts, same again for the article, which put them due to shit on the table in front of strangers in the same month.(‘same time’ my hole).

      Some county paper, six months ago.

Leave a Reply to Foghorn Truthsayer Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *