Prince Andrew’s disastrous interview last Saturday on the BBC Newsnight programme. Can’t believe anybody else hasn’t nominated him as a right royal cunt already yet.
Blimey, just so arrogant, thick and it seems the poor deluded, self-righteous sod appears to be suffering from particularly frequent, albeit temporary, nasty bouts of amnesia. No sympathy for the poor, sex trafficked, teenage sex slaves and this dozy, over-privileged, pompous cunt didn’t see anything wrong?
Know a good pizza when you see one though, don’t you!!
The guy can’t even remember being in that photo with his arm around the girl’s waist. Never met her apparently. Yeah right, Andrew. You might be a cunt, but don’t treat the rest of us as cunts, you cunt.
Nominated by BaldlieBoyz
A right Royal cunting please for His Royal Highness, Prince Andrew.
Everyone who has seen his excruciatingly awful, awkward and downright bizarre Newsnight interview, is just mouth agape at how out of touch with real life this spoilt, over-privileged arsehole is.
Many journalists have described the interview as ‘car crash’ TV, but the most accurate review I read said : “I expected a train wreck, but that was a plane crashing into an oil tanker, causing a tsunami, triggering a nuclear explosion level bad”. It has since been revealed that his PR lackey strongly advised against it, and quit his job when his opinion was ignored.
This guy is completely devoid of any remorse, shame or sympathy for his matter of fact ignorance of the abuse of under age girls, that was going on under his nose – even if he wasn’t taking part himself. As the father of two daughters, it begs the question where his moral compass was, or why his danger radar wasn’t raising concern – but there I am showing my own naivety, as he probably did very little ‘parenting’ himself. It was most likely a team of tutors, valets and social coaches raising the young princesses.
Ultimately, it just shows how the social circle of this ancient elite are so far removed from the lives of us ordinary people. He described Epstein’s conducted as ‘unbecoming’ – “Unbecoming?” Maitlis asked, incredulously “He sexually abused underage children!”
He described himself as ‘not a party goer’ and that the much published photo of him with his arm around the waist of a 17-year-old (at the time) young girl, as “unlikely”.
“I have no recollection of ever meeting her” and “those are the type of clothes I travel in. I would not wear them on an evening out”.
Photos of him in similar clothing, with ‘other’ young women draped around him ‘partying’, seem to disprove his claims of a monk like existence of public service.
There’s ‘another shoe to drop’ in this saga, methinks…..
Nominated by Lord of the Rings
I thought the age of consent was 16. So he shagged her (probably with her consent) when she was above that age a long time ago. Strange thing is that this is deemed horrendous, but highlighting peacefuls grooming and raping preteens is racist.
Personally I think there are more things worrying than this. A result of today’s woke society judging actions of yesteryear by today’s standards.
7