These anti-surveillance cunts are always bleating on about the routine intrusions of GCHQ and NSA spying on everyone’s internet activity? Banging on tediously about the individual’s right to privacy being sacrosanct, the right for personal data to remain personal and private.
And yet many of these are the exact same cunts gleefully posting and reposting the private photos of various actresses hacked from cloud storage services. Obviously I’m not for one moment suggesting that anyone who doesn’t understand the risks of taking naked photos of themselves is NOT a cunt (of course they are, and they’re often displaying their cuntery in the most literal terms), but at least they don’t display the repugnant sanctimoniousnes of these anti-surveillance hypocrites.
Fuck them all, the sad little cunts.
Nominated by: Fred West
Had a nice little syndicate going down at Cheltenham Racecourse a few years back. Some orf us were keeping in touch with those little walkie talkie jobbies. Just a few sportsman trying to earn a crust – no names, won’t specify the race in case we try to pull it orf again – then suddenly best laid plans all down the fucking khazi. Some plummy cunt comes on the tannoy asking punters to desist from using vhf devices on account orf complaints from the spooks at GCHQ. (GCHQ is based back orf the racecourse cunts)
Bugger and bollocks had no option but to call the whole thing orf and kiss goodbye to a chunk orf hard earned already laid out. Found out later from a little camp jockey with contacts with certain poofs in surveillance circles that they had been listening in on our private conversations. Pissed orf apparently that because we were so close we were drowning out other spooky stuff.
Right liberty when Her Majesty’s citizens are prevented from going about their gainful business by the overbearing hand orf some secret plod.
0
Might be breaking the official secrets act, but I’ll tell you anyway…
Few years back, in a former life, I did a week’s work down at GCHQ. Their canteen is shite. On day two I had lunch in there and the next day had a day off work with food poisoning which failed to amuse as I was self employed and paid by the day so day off work = day without pay.
Next day I had a go at the catering manager. “What the fuck was in those fishcakes?” I ask. “Can’t tell you. It’s secret!” he replied. I resisted the temptation to connect fist with face.
“Right – I’m ringing the public health people and let’s see how you like that!”
“No point. We won’t let them in…”
And, sadly, that’s true. Normal law of the land does not seem to apply within GCHQ. I find that rather worrying.
0
MY advice don’t worry, don’t fear. There is nothing to worry or fear about. If there is they’ve got you.
Maybe you could find out and/or expose all you know of their devious workings.You have excellent writing skills and great ability to do it.
You can use governments own rules against them to stay safe. For example, Article 10 of the Geneva Convention, gives strong legal protections to those engaging in public interest journalism
0
The bleating anti-surveillance cunts are system server drone spies of the GCHQ or NSA agendas. They are the drone cunts who report your innocent website photos of holidaying with your kids as evidence you are a paedo. They are the cunts who report your opinion twatter tweets of shooting with a colt 45 at the gun club as evidence you are a terrorist.
The real anti-surveillance people enable proxy serving and encryption software on their mobile devices and PCs; and don’t entertain the fucking idiotic NSA owned twatter or farcebook websites. The real anti-surveillance people keep their fucking mouths shut whilst they go about their business posting clever or silly stuff on Internet websites such as “.. is a cunt” or “big black cocks porn”
0
Those who protest the loudest over their privacy being invaded and their personal data logged are usually the same individuals who are addicted to facebook, twitter and other social network services and who fail to realise that they are giving more information out willingly on a daily basis than is collected by the cloak and dagger mob.
0
I am nominating cunt Internet trolls for cunting
AN OVERVIEW OF THE INTERNET TROLL
{by George Hunter – aka Appalled Parent and George H}
There are many different species of troll fleas hopping about depositing their eggs in the Internet shit.Troll fleas are asexual reproduction and need to spawn spores to fertilize its eggs.These spores are known as “troll comments” on the Internets interaction social network websites. On the Internet the troll flea is universally known as a “troll”. Of course there is loads of shit on the Internet, and tons of the stuff for troll breeding.
The spores when spawned on the eggs in the Internet shit are prone to the variances of software energy that is blowing and swirling like the wind all over the world wide web. It is this wind, carrying millions of troll flea comment spores, that randomly drop them on unsuspecting websites.
Each troll comment spore is a single cell comprehensive. If enough of them drop on a website page they collaborate together as a cohesion multi-celled semi-sentient comprehension. In this comprehending condition the comment spores do three things:
1) Mysteriously morph as perceived inflammatory and extraneous comprehension.
2) Telepathically communicate the spores comprehension to the human sub conscious ego as argument.
3) Enable the conscious human mind to understand it all as “a troll sowing discord” or “a troll starting arguments or upsetting people”
Scientific summary of the Internet troll and its environment:
The Internet “troll” is a nickname for the troll flea. Unlike ordinary fleas, the troll flea is a holometabolous insect. Holometabolism is a monophyletic trait common to all fleas in the super order Endopterygota. The troll flea’s only known habitat is the Internet waste in the world wide web. It is an inflammatory parasite that feeds off its host. Its only known host is the swirling and moving ether-energy given off pseudo-digitally by installed Internet server software. The software energy becomes volatile when the troll fleas’ spores (or spore comments) interact with it.
Troll fleas breed by laying eggs in Internet excrement (the waste product that is trivial and drivel or propaganda). The eggs feed off the waste and mutate into larvae (maggots) feeding for growth and development. The maggot’s pupating period is only about one day, during which the wild troll flea metamorphoses and is hatched.
It immediately starts hopping towards the good Internet energy. It is not known what the life span of a troll is. Studies since 1997 on Microsoft Internet servers have only ascertained that tagged fleas back then were still alive in 2014. Since we don’t know how long the Internet will keep going, we also don’t yet know how long a troll flea can live.
Troll fleas are asexual reproduction (have dual male/female gender and no sex); and are in a permanent orgasmic state. They breed by spawning spores (comment spores) to fertilize each others laid eggs.They produce about one egg every 18 months. It has been estimated there are currently about 10 million troll fleas hopping about on the world wide web.
0
Well it’s safe to say that this cunt does not like trolls.
You have some serious problems cunt, if you are willing to spend such a long time writing the drivel above. Next.
0
Indeed have agree it was the fucking incoherent ramblings of a madman. Was it meant to be funny ?
0
Bugger me George, brevity and levity does not abide in you, does it?
0
I am practising for my social worker NVQ exam which I am told might include writing an essay to describe a media bully and his/hers/its effects on disadvantaged Muslims and advantaged Christians.
0
Does anyone give a shit?
0
I nominate to CUNT the TV licence fee.
The British TV licence fee is utter fee CUNTITUDE dressed up as a fucking tax. I would willingly fore go sex for the rest of my life, and endure excruciating pain, by amputating, without anaesthetic, my own balls, if it scraps forever the TV licence fee for all British people. I am so fucking livid about this issue that it deserves more than just a cunting.
A deadly serious total exposure instead:
The TV licence fee is NOT a tax to watch BBC programs. It is a government tax levied to finance making and creating BBC content.
In reality this TV licence fee is a separate GOVERNMENT tax for receiving transmission signals that enable private TV live broadcast moving images. [TV includes any device capable of enabling live broadcast, for example mobile phone, computer or ordinary television set]. So if you watch any LIVE feed TV news or programs on ANY channel round the world including BBC it is taxed. All non live TV broadcast from any channel round the world including BBC is not subject to the tax: It is recorded content only. And recorded content is 99% of world TV programming!
If the British government wants to keep a state TV broadcasting channel (and still brand it the BBC) it’s simple to do and with NO COSTS to us or them.
The BBC has a vast archive catalogue of films, programs and all manner of other history, science and educational content going back to 1923. It is worth £trillions! Not £millions, not £billions – trillions of pounds. It could be sold off piece meal to any media companies in the world. Or rented out (syndicated), or converted into hardware (DVD) and aggressively sold to wholesalers and retailers worldwide. And there is also all the BBC merchandise – books, toys etc!
All this would generate vastly more cash than the poultry few billions currently collected via the licence fee live TV broadcast tax. With a BBC still kept, future made content can also be sold or rented. A self financing and ongoing BBC!
But they won’t do it. Here’s why:
1) The BBC back catalogue is effectively owned by us – the people tax payers.
2) The private banks and private corporations won’t get any of the action.
3) Thousands of actors, producers, and creators of the content in the archives currently have private BBC contract royalty arrangements. Actors etc would stop receiving these payments when the legalities of the royalties are exposed through the new contracts of selling or renting their work to self finance the BBC. In reality we the people own the royalties, because the actors and producers worked for the BBC: and we the people own the BBC.
4) The people would allow buyers or renters of the BBC archived material to enhance or edit the content to make it suitable for their particular market of viewers. For example the Chinese editing in sub-title translation or editing out parts of a film. Private contractors working for the government want to disallow this (for malevolent reasons), even though it would affect sales.
Lastly, here is a comment article I stole from the Daily Mail website:
“Enforcement officers working on behalf of the BBC are being offered bonuses of up to £1,000 a month to pursue people who fail to pay the TV licence fee. A member of my family bought a property 16 years ago, and made the decision not to have a TV. The licencing authorities were advised of this, and that, in the event that a TV was going to be used in the property, a licence would be purchased. She assumed that would be the end of the matter, other than possible checks that she had told the truth, Not so! Threatening letters are received every month, because she has not bought (or needed) a TV licence. At first, she would contact them and explain, patiently WHY she had no licence. It made no difference. The system is ridiculous, and needs to be changed.”
THE TV LICENCE IS A FUCKING CUNT TAX AND THE EPITOME OF FEE CUNTITUDE
0
George, just a thought- you haven’t bred already have you? You know this problem you have is probably genetic. Anyway, I think the ball removing is probably a good idea regardless of whether the BBC drops the licensing fee.
0