Use the Comment section below to write up your cunting nomination.
The site admins will periodically review the nominations and will either:
✔️ schedule it to be published immediately or at a later date, OR
❌ bin it for any number of reasons
Either way, your nomination will disappear from this page.
That’s how you’ll know it’s been reviewed, so don’t ask.
If you want your cunting nomination published, follow the fucking rules:
[1] Whenever possible include a link to a recognised news source or risk 🗑️.
[2] Unsubstantiated allegations against living people or institutions results in 🗑️.
[3] Too short (less than 5 lines) or too long (more than 50 lines) qualifies it for 🗑️.
[4] Pay attention to grammar, spelling, punctuation & spacing. Unreadable equals 🗑️.
[5] Respond appropriately to an admin comment within 2 days, otherwise it’s 🗑️.
Which leads us to a most important rule:
Do NOT ask questions or add comments to nominations unless:
➡️ specifically requested by an admin, or
➡️ you are seconding a nomination, or
➡️ you are the original nominator and are making a correction, or
➡️ you are adding a link at the request of the nominator or an admin
If you break this rule, you may be moderated indefinitely or possibly banned.
NOW LET’S GET CUNTING!
Prostate screening.
Now this is quite a serious matter, but one that fortunately effects only a few people.
It is unfortunately hereditary so you should have the good sense too get yourself checked.
The current Government has come up with a lot of humiliating ideas (mainly via taxation and legislation) to inflict on the British public, but this one must of been thought up by some raving homo.
The mass fisting of the UK male population over the age of 50!
Now what the fuck was that about? an attempt to rationalise or de stigmatize bum fun?
I am rather glad that idea was vetoed by the NHS and I am sure you all are too.
7
Foreign Protestors in England
Whoever this guy was arguing with…
https://youtu.be/48nZ78QxlQo?si=9waoOlS7waLE-VUh
A true patriot. Does he post on this forum?
Why are they here? Why are they all wearing gimp masks?
What is the point exactly?
4
Alistair Campbell:
Yet again this unelected slimy drunken heap of shit is trying to interfere with Brexit. Not content with being responsible for starting the 2003 Iraq war, which has destabilized the world (and caused mass immigration both legal and illegal into the UK) for over 20 years, the motherfucking pissartist is putting pressure on Kweer Starmer to “at least” take us back into the Customs Union (which means all those trade deals would have to be ripped up if the EU didn’t approve – those deals that were made by the previous government for which Kweer likes to take the credit), he wants us to go further and fully rejoin the Fourth Reich, which, though the shit-stain won’t say so, would mean joining the Euro.
Frankly Campbell had too much power when he was crawling round Blair’s arsehole, and we all know Rodney is as weak as a bullied ten year old schoolgirl, and would soon yield to pressure from the old soak.
It is high time Campbell went back to the gutter he crawled out of, with the piss stains on his tatty trousers and the smell of shit and vomit emanating from him, while he pours meths down his gullet. Why doesn’t Labour tell him to fuck off. They are in quite enough trouble without that twat. The one great advantage of Jeremy Corbyn as their leader was that Campbell and Mandy would never have got a look in. That is not the case with Starmer’s tribute band.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2140369/labour-brexit-betrayal-reverse-remainers-eu
1
Our NHS ( or is it? )
Does anyone remember a news item regarding the proposal to bring 50 severely injured Gazan children, along with their immediate families, to the UK to be treated by the NHS?
I seem to remember comments on here about why here? What about other countries? In the interest of fairness, I did some quick research, and according to a BMJ article Italy, Spain, Norway, USA, UAE and Qatar are also offering medical treatment.
Then the story seem to die a death until I saw this BBC news item.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9zq4xn543o
So, Prince William went to visit ” a number of children from Gaza receiving treatment in a NHS hospital”
The article goes on to say ” as of 21st November, 50 children are receiving treatment in surroundings that are safe and welcoming “. Of course, their families are with them, too.
Our NHS?
Kept that quiet, didn’t they?
As a footnote, has anyone else noticed that almost every BBC news report that mentions Palestine has the following two paragraphs tacked on to the end ?
“Israel launched a military operation in Gaza after Hamas-led militants based in the Palestinian territory attacked Israel on 7 October 2023, killing 1,200 people and abducting 251.
At least 70,100 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory’s Hamas-run health ministry. A ceasefire was called on 10 October”.
This was copied from an article about police arresting protesters two days ago, but is also attached, word for word , on the link.
Biased? Surely not?
3
Constant inquiry’s.
Now they boil my piss, when someone who does not do your job sticks their nose in with a “should have done better attitude”.
It pretty much applies to everything in life it would seem apart from the people who really need looking into, who incidentally seem to be the people orchestrating these enquiry’s.
this little Jem caught my eye.
https://news.sky.com/story/uk-special-forces-unit-had-deliberate-policy-to-kill-fighting-aged-males-in-afghanistan-13477589
Sounds terrible doesn’t it, the cousins will remember Vietnam and hidden arms catches where the villages would wave you past and go get their stuff.
Same applies here, saves you getting shot in the back or them telling their mates that the boys are in town.
I wasn’t in that conflict, I was in one where logistics were a major issue, prisoner handling was not properly considered, they were expected to run away, but they didn’t.
So the problem came about with loose arms on the ground and the people who had been using them milling about.
What now? deplete the fighting force by leaving baby sitters behind? move on and hope they don’t change their mind and rearm? or the alternative.
That my friends is war, that is how it is conducted like it or not, and if you want to keep winning them that’s how you do it.
Afghanistan was by all a counts a fuck up where everyone looked at the other sides human rights in the mistaken belief that they would play nicely if we did.
2
Failing to appear in court is a total cunt.
I recognise that Modern Britain is a soft as shit disaster zone but if any govt,even this present cesspit of vermin,wanted a boost in the “opinion polls” ,they would ensure that the accused particularly those facing the most serious charges are brought to the Dock,by force if necessary.
In the case highlighted in the link we are dealing with an attempted mass murderer,thug and all-round first rate blek cunt..
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c997ng7zx3xo
Knock fuck out the wicked swine,drag into into court,find it guilty at once then hang it outside.
All done in a day,which certainly doesn’t suit the Legal Profession Gravy Train.
What a farce,again.
4
Operation Mincemeat. (Theatre comedy musical).
https://www.thefortunetheatre.com/operation-mincemeat-a-new-musical
I couldn’t believe this shit. Which cunt thought that turning a sombre and delicate part of our combat history into a comedy musical was a good idea? Trivialising conduct by our WWII heroes is bad enough, but to turn this stroke of genius into comedy theatre is treason.
I readily admit I haven’t seen the cuntishness, nor do I intend to.
For those that don’t know what Operation Mincemeat was, it was an ingenious plan to fool the Axis by placing false documents suggesting a bogus invasion on a corpse, and floating him into pro German Spain. This deception drew men and material away from the real invasion site and saved many allied lives.
I thought the film Operation Mincemeat was a bloody insult too. A poor remake of the far superior original, The Man Who Never Was.
Most thespians are a bunch of gay twats, but these theatre morons are top of the cunting tree.
3
Fuck me here we go again.
Non UK National saved from deportation due to potential mental harm and risk of drug addiction if repatriated to his home land.
So in a snip.
He had received cautions for shoplifting and bringing a bladed weapon into school, for which he was suspended from school in 2015.
After his suspension in 2015, a GP referred Izhan to support from ADHD services (wonder what nationality that Doctor was).
Despite his suspension, First-Tier Tribunal Judge Samina Iqbal (lets not speculate where he is from either) previously found that Izhan was “fully immersed in his school life” because he had attended primary and secondary school in the same city, played rugby for the school team and was a “star pupil”.
Although he was also disruptive, suspended and ultimately expelled from school, the judge concluded that his ADHD, PTSD and vulnerability meant he would face “very significant obstacles to integration” if he was deported to Pakistan.
whilst
Dr Arvin Gupta (again lets not speculate), a consultant psychiatrist, gave evidence that while Izhan probably had ADHD, he also had a “mental and behavioural disorder due to the use of [cannabis]”.
however he had graduated, well in the life of crime!
An immigration tribunal also ruled that Muhammad Izhan, who was jailed for dealing class A and B drugs, could stay in the UK because his removal to Pakistan would “have a negative impact on his mental health”.
The tribunal also said there was a risk he would use drugs if he was removed to his home country.
Izhan was sentenced to 30 months in prison for dealing in a “sophisticated” drugs ring, which he joined because of his “inability to properly regulate his ADHD”, the court was told.
From what I can see, someone who is very damaging to this Country is being allowed to stay in it, because the protection of their rights and safety is held above those around him?
read the full article here.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/12/01/pakistani-drug-dealer-deportation-star-pupil-school/?utm_source=newsshowcase&utm_medium=gnews&utm_campaign=CDAqDggAKgYICjCbpHowwqoJMO-21gQ&utm_content=rundown&gaa_at=g&gaa_n=AWEtsqeEM-FJWEZUCuTN0l-FdiptfDo9MpF1_uIVJ7gXoaVjIAfGBMeM3-329HlGN0RW6T1bJUIPgh22CWAT&gaa_ts=692f019d&gaa_sig=Qs4aXgt4E1sliVm8-Q4wtwzWGUpMrPynnTiWhjUF49ztaLaNNDQo2r_Y437FtxrE-6T14b3GTS6gb3Q55ba8HA%3D%3D
now go down to your shed and scream!
3
and I hope this is not the same little cunt.
https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/25616755.norwich-sex-pest-harassed-groped-women-fined-200/
1
The DVSA and the mysterious disappearing driving test slots.
I saw this and thought what the fuck?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0l7ddg2np6o.amp
Now, I took and passed my driving test on the 6th May 1976. Booking a test on-line was not an option. I can’t quite remember what the process was, but I’m fairly sure it involved proving your identity.
So I asked Younger. Apparently, there are two booking portals, one for ordinary people, and one for accredited driving instructors. Somehow, the second portal has been manipulated, or used inappropriately, hence the theatre ticket scalpers version of driving tests, where slots are being offered for up to £500.
The DVSA are supposedly closing the portal, or at least introducing stricter controls. Yeah, ok but I wouldn’t hold my breath.
I almost feel sorry for the poor sod in the link, but my advice, give up driving.
0
sorry this is a direct copy and paste but very acurate.
should the police disclose the ethnicity and background of suspects in high-profile crimes, and how soon should they reveal this information? In the year since the Southport unrest – in which migrant hotels were attacked after online claims the attacker had been an asylum seeker – the British state has had to ask itself this question.
While the ethnicity and nationality of criminal suspects were routinely talked about in the 1980s, since the 1999 MacPherson report into ‘institutional racism’ in the Met, with its concerns racial stereotyping, the police have become far more reluctant to do so. When it came to Southport, for days we were only allowed to know that the suspect was ‘a 17-year-old male from Banks in Lancashire, who is originally from Cardiff’. In the end, this unspeakable atrocity was carried out by someone who clearly did not view himself as part of British society. The sense that officialdom hadn’t been quite straight with the public about the perpetrator – a second generation Rwandan refugee – only fostered public anger and mistrust.
Why, when terrible events happen, don’t they want officialdom to dispel any rumour or speculation by swiftly and calmly setting out the facts?
Jonathan Hall KC, the government’s advisor on terrorism, is among those to have since said this was a mistake and to call for reform: ‘In the digital era, if the police do not take the lead in providing clear, accurate and sober details about an attack like Southport, others will. Social media is a source of news for many people and near-silence in the face of horrific events of major public interest is no longer an option.’ In April, the Home Affairs Committee report on the Southport disorder, without citing Hall, reached a similar conclusion, arguing that an information ‘vacuum’ had undermined public confidence.
David Olusoga’s Empire exposes the BBC’s history problem
When a car was driven into a parade of Liverpool supporters in May, it initially seemed to many like an Islamist terror incident, with Tommy Robinson swiftly calling the ramming a ‘suspected terror attack’ on X. This was an opportunity for Merseyside Police, the same force that had been so slow with the details about Rudakubana, to adopt a more transparent approach. Within two hours of the incident, the police disclosed that the suspect was a ‘53-year-old white British man from the Liverpool area’, before giving a full press conference later that evening. Despite the shock at what had happened, no riots followed.
In August, the National Police Chiefs’ Council has issued new guidance pushing forces to be more upfront, and now these changes have gone out for consultation. The NPCC recommends that in ‘high profile or sensitive’ crimes, police forces ‘should confirm the nationality and/or ethnicity of the suspect or defendant… where there is:
A policing purpose in doing so.
A related risk or impact on public safety such as rising community tension.
Mis- or disinformation leading to community tension.
A significant level of media or social media interest.’
At a time when concerns about immigration, crime and terror are higher than ever, it is only right that officials are upfront with the public when such incidents occur.
But now, elements of the left-wing Blob are fighting a rearguard action against the truth. Led by the Runnymede Trust, 63 activist organisations have sent an open letter to Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and chief constable Gavin Stephens, the NPPC chair, urging the ‘divisive guidance to be revoked with immediate effect’. Signatories include migrant advocate organisations, race charities, feminist campaign groups and the likes of the Muslim Council of Britain (which the last Labour government cut ties with). Over at LinkedIn, campaigners are encouraging each other respond to the consultation to derail the changes (readers can have their own say here).
There is a certain irony about this campaign against transparency. After all, it is precisely these kinds of left-wing organisations who usually complain loudest about the threat of so-called ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ and their supposed power to whip people up into a frenzy. This is the narrative we have heard about the Southport disorder ever since it began, which is very often used to justify internet censorship, despite online rumours playing only a minor role, if any, in that unrest. These are the types who will dismiss any and every right-wing talking point online as a ‘dangerous’ populist falsehood or the deliberate propaganda of ‘Russian bots’. So why, when terrible events happen, don’t they want officialdom to dispel any rumour or speculation by swiftly and calmly setting out the facts?
Perhaps it’s because the facts often have the unfortunate habit of telling the wrong story. For the signatories, the problem is that such disclosures risk ‘fostering a dangerous and misleading conflation between race, migration, and criminality’. They complain that while the guidance was billed as an ‘attempt to dispel misinformation’, it will have the effect of ‘reviving a focus on race and migration status’. The letter cites a Runnymede Trust ‘snapshot analysis’ of media articles from mid-August to mid-November 2023 versus the same period since the NPCC change this year, which ‘shows an increase in the use of descriptors such as certain foreign nationality, asylum status and ethnicity in crime reporting’. The term ‘asylum seeker’ is now being used in articles about serious crime five times more frequently, it says. The ‘extremely dangerous’ result is to ‘encourage the public to perceive ethnicity and migration status as significant factors in the commission of crime.’
But the public are drawing these links because of real events, not just how they are reported. If asylum seekers are being linked with serious crime more frequently, that’s because of the innocent victims asylum seekers have murdered in cold blood in just the past year, like Rhiannon Whyteand Gurvinder Johal. Indeed, while the signatories insist there is ‘no credible academic evidence’ of high migrant crime rates (as if such research would ever be commissioned), Police National Computer data suggests that 26 per cent of sexual assault on women last year were committed by foreign nationals, with another 8 per cent committed by offenders of ‘unknown’ nationality.
The signatories complain that the new disclosure regime ‘contravenes longstanding norms’. In this at least they are correct. On migration, multiculturalism and crime, the previous system of official euphemism, omerta and polite fiction is today collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions. But that can only be a good thing. After decades of being betrayed, the public rightly no longer trust the powers that be. In our fractious age, they will accept nothing of short of the truth.
1
Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio *
Who?
Well apparently, this year’s “Spotify Wrapped” (me neither) has been released, giving fans/idiots a personalised summary of their listening habits over the last year.
The streaming giant said/alleged that Puerto Rican star Bad Bunny (see * above) was `the world’s most-played artist of 2025`, with more than 19.8 billion streams.
His `acclaimed` album Debí Tirar Más Fotos, which embraces his island’s musical heritage**, was also the year’s biggest album – paving the way for him to perform at next year’s Super Bowl half time show. Whatever the fuck that is.
** I`m guessing drugs cartels, corrupt government, national debt crisis and widespread poverty, issues with infrastructure (especially power and roads), and massive violent gang crime epidemics plus the island is also vulnerable to natural disasters like hurricanes and earthquakes would all be quite high up on that list of cultural things to [c]rap about.
Anyway, to save any cunters from projectile vomiting by providing any link to this cunt, I`m providing a link to the Goodies` Funky Gibbon song which I`m sure he`d cover quite admirably.
Give me an “ooo!” … give me another “ooo!” … and one more “ooo!” …
Now put `em together and what`s that spell ??? …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXq8rELhUkw&list=RDpXq8rELhUkw&start_radio=1
🐒🥜
0