In this case, so called experts are cunts.
Sure, doctors have their oath to do no harm, but university debating societies all over the world could spend days debating what the real harm is and come up with thousands of answers, mostly woke.
But who says we need experts? All we need in this case is a money hungry qualified doctor from say, Egypt to get round the rules on only doctors allowed to prescribe/administer things.
Failing that, tattoo artists probably lack morals and would be up for a bit of government cash to tattoo in big black capital letters onto foreheads stating convictions.
Nominated by Cunt of the Isles.
‘Chemical castration for managing sexual offenders’.
Watch out Thomas, they’re coming for you.
7
Chemical has been proven to be unwise, GT.
It turns a perfectly benign, harmless sexual predator into a murderer with his own love dungeon, a project he wouldn’t have felt compelled to complete if his hormones were still intact.
4
The unpleasantness of the whole Josef Fritzl affair and DIY enthusiast Fred West didn’t do your community any favours Cunt Engine.
4
Well, I suppose we could just hang them instead. Problem solved.
Then physically castrate the rapists and child molesters.
3
Experts are unwilling to chemically castrate sex offenders.
Fair enough.
Are they also coming out in force against puberty blockers for young kids who are under the lunatic impression that they can transform into the opposite sex?
Thought not.
Fucking cunts.
8
Exactly what do these experts suggest as an alternative?
I’ve noticed there’s a lot of “experts” who always slag off other people without ever giving a solution to the problem. If there really is a problem, and not something made up for the sake of protesting about anything.
The Hamas problem in Gaza.
Climate change.
Definition of a woman. (Easy one unless your a fucktard).
White privilege.
Etc, etc.
And in this instance, overcrowding in prisons.
Well my solution to that problem is execute all sex offenders. No need for castration, chemical or otherwise.
There. I’m no expert but I’ve found a permanent solution to the problem.
6
The problem will be that there is such a wide range of sex offenders.
Who would you trust to decide on chemical castration?
A judge?
Of course a pédó repeat offender is the classic sex case, but how about the 16 year old boy who has sex with his girlfriend who is a year younger, or perhaps the guy that gets himself on the register because he is seen having a piss somewhere?
The way things are going it’s entirely possible that you could end up on the sex offenders register if a woman overhears you telling a raunchy joke, if you comment favourably on a woman’s clothes, if you wolf whistle at an attractive girl or if you innocently try to pick up a woman in a bar.
5
Good point Artful and the example of the sixteen year old boy and his fifteen year old girlfriend strikes me. This situation obviously exists on a grand scale. Occasionally the law is brought into it, usually when the girls up tight parents find out and raise a complaint. When it goes to court the law is usually lenient in such cases and the lad doesn’t go to jail. However he now has a criminal record with all that implies for the rest of his life. An alternative sometimes offered is a police caution. For other offences also this is often accepted as an alternative to going to court. Most people do not realise that a caution goes on record just the same and will be turned up by any potential employer who runs a check in the future.
2
Pop their heads on spikes outside Westminster.
2
The sex offenders are mostly inside Westminster.
6
Or Buckingham palace.
2
I bet that it would only be white men that are considered for chemical castration.
For Pákí serial child rapists, if the fatties can be bothered to look for them, it’s a cultural thing.
5
“A coward you are Withnail
An expert on bulls you are not.. ”
-withnail & I.
Its easy to classify yourself a expert.
It doesnt count for much.
If chemical castration works then use it.
But i doubt its perfect.
Much better to stretch the neck with hemp.
Experts agree its 100% effective.
2
Fuck the namby-pamby doctors!
Anyway, why chemical castration? Physical castration is far more effective.
Take the peedos to a vet.
Vets have no qualms about castration. They castrate animals every day.
And these peedos are fucking animals, are they not?
Sorted.
3
Funny how these ‘experts’ especially regarding climate change, have no qualms about policy making people poorer and colder with unaffordable ineffective alternatives with lower living standards.
2
Do they still use bromide to lower libido. The old army joke. I’d like to see what would happen if they could rapidly increase ageing which reduces the thought process.
0
jesus, .. if we can’t find the staff to get the pervos eunuched, where the fuck am I gonna get the workforce for my ‘sterilise the seroously stupid’ initiative when I make my run for high office?
0
*seriously, wordcunt?
I only added in ‘seroously’ anyways to keep the more liberal/less fun types quiet.
The policy shall be ‘Sterilise the stupid’.
And I’ll decide the cutoff point.
You’re welcome, society.
0
Years ago the castrato would be more interested in having a beautiful voice than his sexual prowess.
0
The fatso’s refusal to do their job when it comes to park key offenders has largely rendered this argument irrelevant anyway.
If they won’t nick them, you sure as fuck can’t castrate them.
And besides, you can guarantee there’s something in the Koran that would deem it a religious violation.
So that would more or less leave white British males at the mercy of the ‘experts’.
I don’t think they’ll have as many qualms about that.
1
There are far too many experts, who needs them, I know everything about everything and can come up with solutions to any problem.
For example, sorry there are too many, just take my word for it 👍
0
They can all fuck off.
All this “idea” is about is as a political weapon by the vermin in power..
There is nothing to stop anyone they don’t like,looking at you Mr Robinson,being deemed on a whim as a sex offender them threatened with castration.
Anyone with a functioning mind knows this is all politics,the Uniparty afraid of the Far Right Reform hoodlum.party,so spewing out “tough ideas”..
Shite by Cunts.
Oven.
Good morning.
1
Indeed UT.
The most humane solution would be to hang the fuckers, but a return of the death penalty is a complete non starter.
They know this only too well, so come up with fairy stories like this to make them look tough.
0
It should be an optional choice for prisoners, but surgical as opposed to chemical; the latter can fall down if someone doesn’t take the mess.
The choice is surgical castration or stay in jail. The choice then remains with the offender and this solves the ethics argument.
0
The medicine not the mess, fucking slope phone.
0