This is not a new phenomenon, but I always thought it utterly absurd to punish a football club for the “unacceptable” conduct of their fans. Link below, but I’ll copy/paste a section just to also highlight the illiteracy of the cunts who work in so-called journalism these days (just in case they edit it later):

BBC Sport.

West Ham have been charged by the Football Association over alleged homophobic chanting by their fans during last month’s 2-1 loss at Chelsea.

It alleged “the club failed to ensure its spectactors2” and “did not behave in an improper, offensive, abusive, indecent or insulting way with… reference to sexual orientation”

With stewards, plod, CCTV and other fans being encouraged to text the seat number of offenders to the authorities, why should the club itself shoulder (financial) responsibility for what people do, just because they were let into the stadium? If a Wet Spam fan chanted “Chelsea rent boys” to a Chelski fan in a pub, it wouldn’t make sense to charge and fine the owners of the pub for such an atrocious, heinous and hurty-word crime such as that. If it happened in the street, would the local council be held responsible, charged and fined?

The football authorities just can’t get it right. Glasgow Rangers were recently fined by UEFA for their fans holding up banners which a judge deemed, “racist and/or discriminatory behaviour”. Want to know what the banners said?

Keep Woke Foreign Ideologies Out Defend Europe

What is racist or discriminatory about that? I honestly don’t get it.

AOL News.

Funny how when the football authorities want to peddle a discriminatory message like taking the knee or flying LBGQRST+ flags, the fans are just expected to go along with it. But if the fans want to send a “discriminatory” message, it’s not tolerated. Double standard much?

Fill yer boots.

Nominated by : Imitation Yank